Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The bacterial consortium with 40 kg/ha zinc sulfate maximized soil exchangeable zinc.

A claim from The Effect of Zinc Solubilizing Bacteria on Zinc Uptake and Some Properties of Wheat in the Greenhouse · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial consortium with 40 kg/ha zinc sulfate maximized soil exchangeable zinc.

Treatment
bacteria consortium with the application of 40 kg/ha of zinc sulfate fertilizere0
Interactor
consortium of both bacteriume1symbiont
Outcome
soil exchangeable zince0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum amount of soil exchangeable zinc, grain yield, zinc concentration and uptake in grain were observed in the treatment containing bacteria consortium with the application of 40 kg/ha of zinc sulfate fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1459
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84
e1

“consortium of both bacterium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–653

Title

The Effect of Zinc Solubilizing Bacteria on Zinc Uptake and Some Properties of Wheat in the Greenhouse

B. Rezaeiniko; N. Enayatizamir; M. Norouzi Masir Journal of Water and Soil Science 2019. doi:10.29252/jstnar.22.4.249

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e1dc10071a8e535ef4318c81745312669923834004e717f76a3fffcaf0d5a10a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

268 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this claim · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

950 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.