Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8) gave the highest biomass, 14.80 ton ha-1, compared with untreated soil.

A claim from Evaluation of different blended fertilizer types and rates for better production of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Adiyo District, South West Ethiopia · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8) gave the highest biomass, 14.80 ton ha-1, compared with untreated soil.

Taxon
Bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8)e3
Outcome
biomasse3
Direction
higheste3
Value
14.80 ton ha-1e3
Qualifier
9.36 ton ha-1e4
Comparator
untreated soile4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–69
e3

“The highest biomass (14.80 ton ha-1) and grain yield (6.537 ton ha-1) were obtained from application of highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1226
e4

“whereas the lowest biomass (9.36 ton ha-1) and grain yield (3.657 ton ha-1) were obtained from untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1336

Title

Evaluation of different blended fertilizer types and rates for better production of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Adiyo District, South West Ethiopia

Guja, Ute; Abreham, Konjit; Mekuria, Tatek; et al. National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia 2021. doi:10.20372/98h30h98

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-f46a34be944b5139d6ac54cb1090320a908cf8cd62da5a40b799dd730d43d917 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

copper atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

61 papers: 31 positive, 30 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.