Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8) gave the highest grain yield, 6.537 ton ha-1, compared with untreated soil.

A claim from Evaluation of different blended fertilizer types and rates for better production of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Adiyo District, South West Ethiopia · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8) gave the highest grain yield, 6.537 ton ha-1, compared with untreated soil.

Taxon
Bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8)e3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
6.537 ton ha-1e3
Qualifier
3.657 ton ha-1e4
Comparator
untreated soile4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–69
e3

“The highest biomass (14.80 ton ha-1) and grain yield (6.537 ton ha-1) were obtained from application of highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1226
e4

“whereas the lowest biomass (9.36 ton ha-1) and grain yield (3.657 ton ha-1) were obtained from untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1336

Title

Evaluation of different blended fertilizer types and rates for better production of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Adiyo District, South West Ethiopia

Guja, Ute; Abreham, Konjit; Mekuria, Tatek; et al. National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia 2021. doi:10.20372/98h30h98

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-cab09a55fda69898833c81adfd570a1220edf4bd71ce1a312b6bed974cc08c0f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.