Paper · 2021 · National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia

Evaluation of different blended fertilizer types and rates for better production of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Adiyo District, South West Ethiopia

Guja, Ute; Abreham, Konjit; Mekuria, Tatek; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop and source of income for farmers. It is the most responsive crop to fertilizer application. Field experiment was carried out on farmer's field in 2016/17 and 2017/18 main cropping seasons to evaluate the response of bread wheat to different blended fertilizers types and rates at Adiyo district, Southwestern Ethiopia. Eight treatments: Control (T1), four rates of NPSB: (46N,54P2O5,10S, 1.07B (T2); 69N, 72P2O5, 13S, 1.4B (T3), 92N, 90P2O5, 17S, 1.7B (T4) and 92N, 36P2O5, 7S, 0.71B (T5)) and three rates of NPSBCu: T2+Cu (T6), T3+Cu (T7), T4+Cu (T8) were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. Crop parameters measured were analyzed using proc GLM procedures in the SAS 9.3 version. Analysis was also performed to investigate the economic feasibility of the fertilizers for wheat production. Results indicated that application of both type and three rates of each fertilizer significantly (p < 0.05) affected all tested parameters except thousand seed weight, which was improved by only T4. The highest biomass (14.80 ton ha-1) and grain yield (6.537 ton ha-1) were obtained from application of highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8) whereas the lowest biomass (9.36 ton ha-1) and grain yield (3.657 ton ha-1) were obtained from untreated soil. The application of NPSB+Cu (T8) also gave highest net benefit of Birr 46637.10 and acceptable MRR% was 151.02%. Hence farmers at study area and similar agro-ecology could use NPSB+Cu @ a rate (92N, 90P2O5, 17S, 1.7B) and 600 gm Cu as foliar application. However, further verification study is needed to give reliable and consistent recommendation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of the blended fertilizer types and rates significantly affected all tested wheat parameters except thousand seed weight, compared with the control.

Taxon
Bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
application of both type and three rates of each fertilizere2
Outcome
tested parameterse2
Comparator
Control (T1)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight treatments: Control (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–419 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of both type and three rates of each fertilizer significantly (p < 0.05) affected all tested parameters except thousand seed weight, which was improved by only T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand seed weight was improved only by the T4 fertilizer rate.

Taxon
Bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
T4e2
Outcome
thousand seed weighte2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–69 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of both type and three rates of each fertilizer significantly (p < 0.05) affected all tested parameters except thousand seed weight, which was improved by only T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8) gave the highest biomass, 14.80 ton ha-1, compared with untreated soil.

Taxon
Bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8)e3
Outcome
biomasse3
Direction
higheste3
Value
14.80 ton ha-1e3
Qualifier
9.36 ton ha-1e4
Comparator
untreated soile4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–69 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest biomass (14.80 ton ha-1) and grain yield (6.537 ton ha-1) were obtained from application of highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1226 · show in text ↑
e4

“whereas the lowest biomass (9.36 ton ha-1) and grain yield (3.657 ton ha-1) were obtained from untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8) gave the highest grain yield, 6.537 ton ha-1, compared with untreated soil.

Taxon
Bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8)e3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
6.537 ton ha-1e3
Qualifier
3.657 ton ha-1e4
Comparator
untreated soile4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–69 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest biomass (14.80 ton ha-1) and grain yield (6.537 ton ha-1) were obtained from application of highest rate of NPSB+Cu (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1226 · show in text ↑
e4

“whereas the lowest biomass (9.36 ton ha-1) and grain yield (3.657 ton ha-1) were obtained from untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPSB+Cu (T8) gave the highest net benefit, Birr 46637.10.

Taxon
Bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
NPSB+Cu (T8)e5
Outcome
net benefite5
Direction
higheste5
Value
Birr 46637.10e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–69 · show in text ↑
e5

“The application of NPSB+Cu (T8) also gave highest net benefit of Birr 46637.10 and acceptable MRR% was 151.02%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1448 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The acceptable MRR% for NPSB+Cu (T8) was 151.02%.

Taxon
Bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
MRR%e5
Value
151.02%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–69 · show in text ↑
e5

“The application of NPSB+Cu (T8) also gave highest net benefit of Birr 46637.10 and acceptable MRR% was 151.02%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1448 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers in similar agro-ecologies could use NPSB+Cu at 92N, 90P2O5, 17S, 1.7B with 600 gm Cu as foliar application.

Taxon
Bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
92N, 90P2O5, 17S, 1.7Be6
Outcome
use NPSB+Cue6
Value
600 gm Cue6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–69 · show in text ↑
e6

“farmers at study area and similar agro-ecology could use NPSB+Cu @ a rate (92N, 90P2O5, 17S, 1.7B) and 600 gm Cu as foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1590 · show in text ↑

copper atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

61 papers: 31 positive, 30 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.