By organism › Green plants › Fabaceae › Acacia papyrocarpa

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees did not use surface soil water at depths of at most 1 m.

Taxon: Acacia papyrocarpaAcacia papyrocarpat0
Outcome: surface soil watere0
Direction: did not sourcee0

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0
“trees did not source surface soil water (≤1 m)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–778

t0
“Acacia papyrocarpa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–60

Title

The potential for deep groundwater use by Acacia papyrocarpa (Western myall) in a water‐limited environment

Emma K. Steggles; Kate L. Holland; David J. Chittleborough; et al. Ecohydrology 2016. doi:10.1002/eco.1791

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees probably used deep soil water rather than deep groundwater.

Taxon: Acacia papyrocarpaAcacia papyrocarpat0
Outcome: deep soil watere0
Qualifier: probablye0
Comparator: deep groundwatere0

Verbatim

e0
“probably sourced deep soil water (i.e. >1 m) rather than deep groundwater”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–857

t0
“Acacia papyrocarpa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–60

Title

The potential for deep groundwater use by Acacia papyrocarpa (Western myall) in a water‐limited environment

Emma K. Steggles; Kate L. Holland; David J. Chittleborough; et al. Ecohydrology 2016. doi:10.1002/eco.1791

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root mapping showed roots could reach groundwater deeper than 20 m.

Taxon: Acacia papyrocarpaAcacia papyrocarpat0
Outcome: tree roots were capable of reaching groundwatere0
Value: >20 me0

Verbatim

e0
“root mapping showed tree roots were capable of reaching groundwater at depths >20 m”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1013

t0
“Acacia papyrocarpa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–60

Title

The potential for deep groundwater use by Acacia papyrocarpa (Western myall) in a water‐limited environment

Emma K. Steggles; Kate L. Holland; David J. Chittleborough; et al. Ecohydrology 2016. doi:10.1002/eco.1791

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isotopes indicated possible groundwater contribution to tree water use.

Taxon: Acacia papyrocarpaAcacia papyrocarpat0
Outcome: potential contribution by groundwater to tree water usee0

Verbatim

e0
“isotope results indicated a potential contribution by groundwater to tree water use”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1102

t0
“Acacia papyrocarpa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–60

Title

The potential for deep groundwater use by Acacia papyrocarpa (Western myall) in a water‐limited environment

Emma K. Steggles; Kate L. Holland; David J. Chittleborough; et al. Ecohydrology 2016. doi:10.1002/eco.1791

Other claims from this paper (4)

Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low osmotic potential and high acidity likely limited groundwater uptake at sampling.

Taxon: Acacia papyrocarpaAcacia papyrocarpat0
Outcome: groundwater uptakee0
Qualifier: low osmotic potentials and/or high acidity levelse0

Verbatim

e0
“low osmotic potentials and/or high acidity levels were shown to pose likely barriers to groundwater uptake, at least at the time of sampling”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1253

t0
“Acacia papyrocarpa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–60

Title

The potential for deep groundwater use by Acacia papyrocarpa (Western myall) in a water‐limited environment

Emma K. Steggles; Kate L. Holland; David J. Chittleborough; et al. Ecohydrology 2016. doi:10.1002/eco.1791

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observation Trees did not use surface soil water at depths of at most 1 m.
Observation Trees probably used deep soil water rather than deep groundwater.
Observation Root mapping showed roots could reach groundwater deeper than 20 m.
Observation Isotopes indicated possible groundwater contribution to tree water use.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three species had physical seed dormancy.

Taxon: Acacia papyrocarpa, Acacia oswaldii and Senna artemisioidesAcacia oswaldiiSenna artemisioidesAcacia papyrocarpat0
Outcome: physical dormancye0

Verbatim

e0
“Imbibition testing indicated that all three species had physical dormancy”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–501

t0
“Acacia papyrocarpa, Acacia oswaldii and Senna artemisioides”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–119

Title

Dormancy-breaking and germination requirements for seeds of Acacia papyrocarpa, Acacia oswaldii and Senna artemisioides ssp. × coriacea, three Australian arid-zone Fabaceae species

Leanne M. Pound; Phillip J. Ainsley; José M. Facelli Australian Journal of Botany 2015. doi:10.1071/bt14077

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation A. oswaldii had a lower proportion of dormant seeds and a thinner testa.
Intervention effect Mechanically scarified seeds germinated readily and reached maximum numbers within 10–15 days regardless of incubation temperature, except for slower cool-temperature germination in S. artemisioides.
Intervention effect Wet heat alleviated physical dormancy more effectively than dry heat.
Intervention effect Dry heat caused seed mortality in some cases.
Recommendation Wet heat pretreatment is recommended for A. papyrocarpa seeds in restoration.
Recommendation Wet heat pretreatment is recommended for S. artemisoides seeds in restoration.
Recommendation A. oswaldii seeds require no pretreatment for dormancy loss.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanically scarified seeds germinated readily and reached maximum numbers within 10–15 days regardless of incubation temperature, except for slower cool-temperature germination in S. artemisioides.

Taxon: Acacia papyrocarpa, Acacia oswaldii and Senna artemisioidesAcacia oswaldiiSenna artemisioidesAcacia papyrocarpat0
Treatment: Mechanically scarifiede0
Outcome: germinated readilye0
Direction: reaching maximume0
Value: 10–15 dayse0
Qualifier: with the exception of S. artemisioides seeds, which germinated at a slower rate in cooler temperaturese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Mechanically scarified seeds germinated readily, reaching maximum numbers in 10–15 days, independently of incubation temperatures, with the exception of S. artemisioides seeds, which germinated at a slower rate in cooler temperatures.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–966

t0
“Acacia papyrocarpa, Acacia oswaldii and Senna artemisioides”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–119

Title

Dormancy-breaking and germination requirements for seeds of Acacia papyrocarpa, Acacia oswaldii and Senna artemisioides ssp. × coriacea, three Australian arid-zone Fabaceae species

Leanne M. Pound; Phillip J. Ainsley; José M. Facelli Australian Journal of Botany 2015. doi:10.1071/bt14077

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation All three species had physical seed dormancy.
Observation A. oswaldii had a lower proportion of dormant seeds and a thinner testa.
Intervention effect Wet heat alleviated physical dormancy more effectively than dry heat.
Intervention effect Dry heat caused seed mortality in some cases.
Recommendation Wet heat pretreatment is recommended for A. papyrocarpa seeds in restoration.
Recommendation Wet heat pretreatment is recommended for S. artemisoides seeds in restoration.
Recommendation A. oswaldii seeds require no pretreatment for dormancy loss.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wet heat alleviated physical dormancy more effectively than dry heat.

Taxon: Acacia papyrocarpa, Acacia oswaldii and Senna artemisioidesAcacia oswaldiiSenna artemisioidesAcacia papyrocarpat0
Treatment: wet heate0
Outcome: physical dormancye0
Direction: more effectivee0
Comparator: dry heate0

Verbatim

e0
“wet heat was more effective than dry heat to alleviate physical dormancy”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1048

t0
“Acacia papyrocarpa, Acacia oswaldii and Senna artemisioides”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–119

Title

Dormancy-breaking and germination requirements for seeds of Acacia papyrocarpa, Acacia oswaldii and Senna artemisioides ssp. × coriacea, three Australian arid-zone Fabaceae species

Leanne M. Pound; Phillip J. Ainsley; José M. Facelli Australian Journal of Botany 2015. doi:10.1071/bt14077

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation All three species had physical seed dormancy.
Observation A. oswaldii had a lower proportion of dormant seeds and a thinner testa.
Intervention effect Mechanically scarified seeds germinated readily and reached maximum numbers within 10–15 days regardless of incubation temperature, except for slower cool-temperature germination in S. artemisioides.
Intervention effect Dry heat caused seed mortality in some cases.
Recommendation Wet heat pretreatment is recommended for A. papyrocarpa seeds in restoration.
Recommendation Wet heat pretreatment is recommended for S. artemisoides seeds in restoration.
Recommendation A. oswaldii seeds require no pretreatment for dormancy loss.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry heat caused seed mortality in some cases.

Taxon: Acacia papyrocarpa, Acacia oswaldii and Senna artemisioidesAcacia oswaldiiSenna artemisioidesAcacia papyrocarpat0
Treatment: dry heate0
Outcome: seed mortalitye0
Qualifier: in some casese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“dry heat in some cases resulted in seed mortality”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1107

t0
“Acacia papyrocarpa, Acacia oswaldii and Senna artemisioides”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–119

Title

Dormancy-breaking and germination requirements for seeds of Acacia papyrocarpa, Acacia oswaldii and Senna artemisioides ssp. × coriacea, three Australian arid-zone Fabaceae species

Leanne M. Pound; Phillip J. Ainsley; José M. Facelli Australian Journal of Botany 2015. doi:10.1071/bt14077

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation All three species had physical seed dormancy.
Observation A. oswaldii had a lower proportion of dormant seeds and a thinner testa.
Intervention effect Mechanically scarified seeds germinated readily and reached maximum numbers within 10–15 days regardless of incubation temperature, except for slower cool-temperature germination in S. artemisioides.
Intervention effect Wet heat alleviated physical dormancy more effectively than dry heat.
Recommendation Wet heat pretreatment is recommended for A. papyrocarpa seeds in restoration.
Recommendation Wet heat pretreatment is recommended for S. artemisoides seeds in restoration.
Recommendation A. oswaldii seeds require no pretreatment for dormancy loss.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Wet heat pretreatment is recommended for A. papyrocarpa seeds in restoration.

Taxon: A. papyrocarpaAcacia papyrocarpae0
Outcome: pretreated with wet heate0

Verbatim

e0
“it is recommended that seeds of A. papyrocarpa and S. artemisoides be pretreated with wet heat in future restoration programs.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1266

Title

Dormancy-breaking and germination requirements for seeds of Acacia papyrocarpa, Acacia oswaldii and Senna artemisioides ssp. × coriacea, three Australian arid-zone Fabaceae species

Leanne M. Pound; Phillip J. Ainsley; José M. Facelli Australian Journal of Botany 2015. doi:10.1071/bt14077

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation All three species had physical seed dormancy.
Observation A. oswaldii had a lower proportion of dormant seeds and a thinner testa.
Intervention effect Mechanically scarified seeds germinated readily and reached maximum numbers within 10–15 days regardless of incubation temperature, except for slower cool-temperature germination in S. artemisioides.
Intervention effect Wet heat alleviated physical dormancy more effectively than dry heat.
Intervention effect Dry heat caused seed mortality in some cases.
Recommendation Wet heat pretreatment is recommended for S. artemisoides seeds in restoration.
Recommendation A. oswaldii seeds require no pretreatment for dormancy loss.

Acacia papyrocarpa 17 claims

17 claims