Abstract
Two field experiments, one each on well drained and poorly drained soils were conducted on wheat and rice cropping sequence (RWCS) for three years commencing from rabi 2004 at Kamal. Wheat was sown in conventional method and on raised beds followed by rice transplanting without puddling on the same beds after their renovation. In wheat crop yield attributing characters viz, number of spikelets per spike, number of grains per spike, spike weight, grain and straw yields, root length, root spread and root weight were higher in raised bed sowing as compared to conventional method of sowing at both well drained and poorly drained soils. In rice crop, the plant height, number of panicles per hill, number of grains per panicle, panicle length, panicle weight, test weight and grain and straw yields did not differ significantly in raised bed and conventional transplanting in both well drained soil and in poorly drained soil, except the number of panicles per hill, panicle length and grain yield were higher in raised bed transplanting as compared to conventional transplanting in first year only (2005). The higher root length, root spread and root weight of rice were observed in bed transplanting as compared to conventional transplanting at both sites.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed sowing increased wheat spikelets per spike, grains per spike and spike weight at both sites.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- raised bed sowinge0
- Outcome
- number of spikelets per spike, number of grains per spike, spike weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- at both well drained and poorly drained soilse0
- Comparator
- conventional method of sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In wheat crop yield attributing characters viz, number of spikelets per spike, number of grains per spike, spike weight, grain and straw yields, root length, root spread and root weight were higher in raised bed sowing as compared to conventional method of sowing at both well drained and poorly drained soils”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed sowing increased wheat grain and straw yields at both sites.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- raised bed sowinge0
- Outcome
- grain and straw yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- at both well drained and poorly drained soilse0
- Comparator
- conventional method of sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In wheat crop yield attributing characters viz, number of spikelets per spike, number of grains per spike, spike weight, grain and straw yields, root length, root spread and root weight were higher in raised bed sowing as compared to conventional method of sowing at both well drained and poorly drained soils”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed sowing increased wheat root length, spread and weight at both sites.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- raised bed sowinge0
- Outcome
- root length, root spread and root weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- at both well drained and poorly drained soilse0
- Comparator
- conventional method of sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In wheat crop yield attributing characters viz, number of spikelets per spike, number of grains per spike, spike weight, grain and straw yields, root length, root spread and root weight were higher in raised bed sowing as compared to conventional method of sowing at both well drained and poorly drained soils”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice plant height, panicle number and grain number generally did not differ significantly between raised and conventional transplanting.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- raised bede0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of panicles per hill, number of grains per paniclee0
- Direction
- did not differ significantlye0
- Comparator
- conventional transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In rice crop, the plant height, number of panicles per hill, number of grains per panicle, panicle length, panicle weight, test weight and grain and straw yields did not differ significantly in raised bed and conventional transplanting in both well drained soil and in poorly drained soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice panicle length, panicle weight and test weight generally did not differ significantly between transplanting methods.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- raised bede0
- Outcome
- panicle length, panicle weight, test weighte0
- Direction
- did not differ significantlye0
- Comparator
- conventional transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In rice crop, the plant height, number of panicles per hill, number of grains per panicle, panicle length, panicle weight, test weight and grain and straw yields did not differ significantly in raised bed and conventional transplanting in both well drained soil and in poorly drained soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice grain and straw yields generally did not differ significantly between transplanting methods.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- raised bede0
- Outcome
- grain and straw yieldse0
- Direction
- did not differ significantlye0
- Comparator
- conventional transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In rice crop, the plant height, number of panicles per hill, number of grains per panicle, panicle length, panicle weight, test weight and grain and straw yields did not differ significantly in raised bed and conventional transplanting in both well drained soil and in poorly drained soil”
Claim · model-written summary
In the first year, raised bed transplanting increased rice panicles per hill and panicle length versus conventional transplanting.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- raised bed transplantinge0
- Outcome
- number of panicles per hill, panicle lengthe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- in first year only (2005)e0
- Comparator
- conventional transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of panicles per hill, panicle length and grain yield were higher in raised bed transplanting as compared to conventional transplanting in first year only (2005)”
e1“In rice crop”
Claim · model-written summary
In the first year, raised bed transplanting increased rice grain yield versus conventional transplanting.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- raised bed transplantinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- in first year only (2005)e0
- Comparator
- conventional transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of panicles per hill, panicle length and grain yield were higher in raised bed transplanting as compared to conventional transplanting in first year only (2005)”
e1“In rice crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Bed transplanting increased rice root length, spread and weight at both sites.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- bed transplantinge0
- Outcome
- root length, root spread and root weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- at both sitese0
- Comparator
- conventional transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The higher root length, root spread and root weight of rice were observed in bed transplanting as compared to conventional transplanting at both sites”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →transplanting · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
223 papers more in this group
See all 227 papers →tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
263 papers more in this group
See all 267 papers →tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
725 papers more in this group
See all 729 papers →transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
1,074 papers more in this group
See all 1,078 papers →tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
1,410 papers more in this group
See all 1,414 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.