Paper · 2001 · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)

Distribution of Mineral Ions in Root and Leaf Tissues and Their Role in Salt Tolerance of Wheat Varieties under Saline Conditions

Maqsood Ahmed Kamboh; Yoko Oki; Tadashi Adachi

8
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The distribution on Ca, K, Na and Cl in root and leaves was studied in salt tolerant variety (Chikugo Izumi) and salt sensitive variety (PB-81) of wheat under saline conditions. The plants grown in 5% Hoagland's nutrient solution were subjected to 100 mM NaCl salinity for one week before observation with scanning electron microscope and analysis of selected samples with X-ray microanalyzer. Root growth was not affected in salt tolerant variety but reduced significantly in salt sensitive variety. Shoot growth was reduced in both varieties but much higher in salt sensitive variety. Salinity increased accumulation of Na and Cl in all root cells including vascular cells in salt sensitive variety. Salt tolerant variety not only reduced uptake of Na and Cl under saline conditions but also restricted their accumulation in cortex maintaining vascular cells relatively free of these ions. Salt sensitive variety failed to block transport of Na and Cl from root to leaves leading to much accumulation of these ions in leaves under salinity sterss.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth in the salt tolerant variety was not affected by salinity.

Material
Chikugo Izumie2
Organ / stage
Roote1
Treatment
100 mM NaCl salinitye3
Outcome
Root growthe1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance of Wheat Varieties under Saline Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root growth was not affected in salt tolerant variety but reduced significantly in salt sensitive variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–499 · show in text ↑
e2

“salt tolerant variety (Chikugo Izumi) and salt sensitive variety (PB-81) of wheat under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–176 · show in text ↑
e3

“subjected to 100 mM NaCl salinity for one week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth in the salt sensitive variety was significantly reduced under salinity.

Material
PB-81e2
Organ / stage
Roote1
Treatment
100 mM NaCl salinitye3
Outcome
Root growthe1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance of Wheat Varieties under Saline Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root growth was not affected in salt tolerant variety but reduced significantly in salt sensitive variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–499 · show in text ↑
e2

“salt tolerant variety (Chikugo Izumi) and salt sensitive variety (PB-81) of wheat under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–176 · show in text ↑
e3

“subjected to 100 mM NaCl salinity for one week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot growth was reduced under salinity in both wheat varieties.

Organ / stage
Shoote4
Treatment
100 mM NaCl salinitye3
Outcome
Shoot growthe4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance of Wheat Varieties under Saline Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“subjected to 100 mM NaCl salinity for one week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–281 · show in text ↑
e4

“Shoot growth was reduced in both varieties but much higher in salt sensitive variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The shoot growth reduction was much higher in the salt sensitive variety than in the salt tolerant variety.

Material
PB-81e2
Treatment
100 mM NaCl salinitye3
Outcome
Shoot growthe4
Direction
much highere4
Comparator
salt tolerant varietye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance of Wheat Varieties under Saline Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“salt tolerant variety (Chikugo Izumi) and salt sensitive variety (PB-81) of wheat under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–176 · show in text ↑
e3

“subjected to 100 mM NaCl salinity for one week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–281 · show in text ↑
e4

“Shoot growth was reduced in both varieties but much higher in salt sensitive variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased Na and Cl accumulation in all root cells, including vascular cells, of the salt sensitive variety.

Material
PB-81e2
Organ / stage
root cellse5
Treatment
Salinitye5
Outcome
accumulation of Na and Cle5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance of Wheat Varieties under Saline Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“salt tolerant variety (Chikugo Izumi) and salt sensitive variety (PB-81) of wheat under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–176 · show in text ↑
e5

“Salinity increased accumulation of Na and Cl in all root cells including vascular cells in salt sensitive variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The salt tolerant variety reduced Na and Cl uptake under saline conditions.

Material
Chikugo Izumie2
Treatment
under saline conditionse6
Outcome
uptake of Na and Cle6
Direction
reducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance of Wheat Varieties under Saline Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“salt tolerant variety (Chikugo Izumi) and salt sensitive variety (PB-81) of wheat under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–176 · show in text ↑
e6

“Salt tolerant variety not only reduced uptake of Na and Cl under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The salt tolerant variety restricted Na and Cl accumulation in the cortex, keeping vascular cells relatively free of these ions.

Material
Chikugo Izumie2
Organ / stage
cortexe7
Treatment
under saline conditionse6
Outcome
accumulation in cortexe7
Direction
restrictede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance of Wheat Varieties under Saline Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“salt tolerant variety (Chikugo Izumi) and salt sensitive variety (PB-81) of wheat under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–176 · show in text ↑
e6

“Salt tolerant variety not only reduced uptake of Na and Cl under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–784 · show in text ↑
e7

“restricted their accumulation in cortex maintaining vascular cells relatively free of these ions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The salt sensitive variety failed to block Na and Cl transport from root to leaves, leading to increased ion accumulation in leaves.

Material
PB-81e2
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
100 mM NaCl salinitye3
Outcome
accumulation of these ions in leavese0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance of Wheat Varieties under Saline Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“salt tolerant variety (Chikugo Izumi) and salt sensitive variety (PB-81) of wheat under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–176 · show in text ↑
e3

“subjected to 100 mM NaCl salinity for one week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–281 · show in text ↑
e0

“Salt sensitive variety failed to block transport of Na and Cl from root to leaves leading to much accumulation of these ions in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1026 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

137 papers: 24 positive, 113 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

sodium chloride · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 10 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 19 positive, 66 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 19 positive, 68 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

327 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.