Paper · 1981 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Effects of Growth Regulators and Sugar on the Growth of Apple Apical Shoot

Hirokazu FUKUI; Shigeru IMAKAWA; Tsutomu TAMURA

18
claims
38
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In order to clarify the mechanism of the growth of an apple shoot, the authors aseptically cultured shoot apices (about 0.5mm in length) on an agar medium con taining Murashige and Skoog′s inorganic and organic substances. The effect of growth regulators and sucrose on the growth of the shoot apex was investigated. The results are summarized as follows.1. The effect of α-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) was not observed in the differ entiation and elongation of leaves, and the growth of the shoot apex was inhibited by high concentration of NAA.2. The differentiation and elongation of leaves was enhanced on a culture medi um with N6-benzyladenine(BA), whereas the length and number of leaves increased according to the increase in BA concentrations within a range of 0.01 to 10μM. The apical shoots cultured on a medium with BA continued growing for six weeks. The number of leaves differentiating at 10μM BA was three fold, and the length of the longest leaf was seven fold as large as those of control respectively.3. Gibberellic acid (GA) had no effect on the internode elongation, but enhanced the differentiation and elongation of leaves. However the effectiveness of GA became stronger with the increase in concentration within a range of 0.01 to 0.1μM, and was observed slightly at above 0.1μM. But the differentiation and elongation of leaves was not enhanced by prolonging the culture period beyond four weeks. Therefore, it seemed that GA affects the growth of shoot apices within four weeks.4. In treatment of BA combined with NAA, the effectiveness of BA on the differentiation and elongation of leaves was observed at higher concentrations of NAA, suggesting that the effect of NAA was antagonistic to that of BA.5. No callus formation was obtained on a media containing NAA, BA or GA alone, but under treatment of both BA and NAA callus formation was observed remarkably. The induction and growth of callus increased with the increase of concentrations of both NAA and BA.6. The differentiation and elongation of leaves was inhibited by decreasing the sucrose concentration regardless of BA concentration. It is considered that sucrose is a limiting factor of the differentiation and elongation of leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA showed no effect on the differentiation and elongation of apple leaves in culture.

Treatment
α-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)e0
Outcome
elongation of leavese0
Direction
was not observede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effect of α-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) was not observed in the differ entiation and elongation of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High NAA concentration inhibited growth of the apple shoot apex.

Treatment
high concentration of NAAe1
Outcome
growth of the shoot apexe1
Direction
inhibitede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“the growth of the shoot apex was inhibited by high concentration of NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N6-benzyladenine (BA) enhanced the differentiation and elongation of apple leaves in culture.

Treatment
N6-benzyladenine(BA)e3
Outcome
differentiation and elongation of leavese2
Direction
enhancede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e2

“The differentiation and elongation of leaves was enhanced on a culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–619 · show in text ↑
e3

“with N6-benzyladenine(BA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–653 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Length and number of apple leaves increased with BA concentration within 0.01 to 10 μM.

Treatment
BA concentrationse4
Outcome
length and number of leavese4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
within a range of 0.01 to 10e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e4

“the length and number of leaves increased according to the increase in BA concentrations within a range of 0.01 to 10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10μM BA the number of differentiating leaves was three fold that of the control.

Treatment
10μM BAe5
Outcome
number of leaves differentiatinge5
Direction
increaseinferrede5
Value
three folde5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e5

“The number of leaves differentiating at 10μM BA was three fold, and the length of the longest leaf was seven fold as large as those of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10μM BA the length of the longest leaf was seven fold that of the control.

Treatment
10μM BAe5
Outcome
length of the longest leafe5
Direction
increaseinferrede5
Value
seven folde5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e5

“The number of leaves differentiating at 10μM BA was three fold, and the length of the longest leaf was seven fold as large as those of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellic acid had no effect on internode elongation of apple shoots in culture.

Treatment
Gibberellic acid (GA)e6
Outcome
internode elongatione6
Direction
had no effecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e6

“Gibberellic acid (GA) had no effect on the internode elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellic acid enhanced the differentiation and elongation of apple leaves in culture.

Treatment
Gibberellic acid (GA)e6
Outcome
differentiation and elongation of leavese7
Direction
enhancede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e6

“Gibberellic acid (GA) had no effect on the internode elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1086 · show in text ↑
e7

“but enhanced the differentiation and elongation of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1145 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effectiveness of GA on apple leaves became stronger with increasing concentration within 0.01 to 0.1μM.

Treatment
increase in concentratione1
Outcome
effectiveness of GAe1
Direction
became strongere1
Qualifier
within a range of 0.01 to 0.1μMe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“the effectiveness of GA became stronger with the increase in concentration within a range of 0.01 to 0.1μM, and was observed slightly at above 0.1μM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolonging the culture period beyond four weeks did not further enhance leaf differentiation and elongation.

Treatment
prolonging the culture period beyond four weekse1
Outcome
differentiation and elongation of leavese1
Direction
was not enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“differentiation and elongation of leaves was not enhanced by prolonging the culture period beyond four weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1421 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

GA seemed to affect shoot apex growth within four weeks of culture.

Treatment
GAe1
Outcome
growth of shoot apicese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Therefore, it seemed that GA affects the growth of shoot apices within four weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1504 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effectiveness of BA on leaf differentiation and elongation was observed at higher NAA concentrations.

Treatment
BA combined with NAAe1
Outcome
effectiveness of BAe1
Qualifier
at higher concentrations of NAAe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“In treatment of BA combined with NAA, the effectiveness of BA on the differentiation and elongation of leaves was observed at higher concentrations of NAA, suggesting that the effect of NAA was antagonistic to that of BA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1728 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

NAA appeared antagonistic to BA in its effect on apple leaf differentiation and elongation.

Compound
NAAe1
Outcome
effect of NAAe1
Direction
antagonistice1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“In treatment of BA combined with NAA, the effectiveness of BA on the differentiation and elongation of leaves was observed at higher concentrations of NAA, suggesting that the effect of NAA was antagonistic to that of BA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1728 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No callus formed on apple shoots cultured on media with NAA, BA or GA alone.

Treatment
NAA, BA or GA alonee1
Outcome
No callus formatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“No callus formation was obtained on a media containing NAA, BA or GA alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1806 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus formed on apple shoots under combined BA and NAA treatment.

Treatment
both BA and NAAe1
Outcome
callus formatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“under treatment of both BA and NAA callus formation was observed remarkably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–1887 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus induction and growth increased with increasing concentrations of NAA and BA.

Treatment
concentrations of both NAA and BAe1
Outcome
induction and growth of calluse1
Direction
increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“The induction and growth of callus increased with the increase of concentrations of both NAA and BA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–1988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreasing sucrose concentration inhibited leaf differentiation and elongation regardless of BA concentration.

Treatment
decreasing the sucrose concentratione1
Outcome
differentiation and elongation of leavese1
Direction
inhibitede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“differentiation and elongation of leaves was inhibited by decreasing the sucrose concentration regardless of BA concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1996–2121 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose is considered a limiting factor of leaf differentiation and elongation.

Compound
sucrosee1
Outcome
differentiation and elongation of leavese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Apical Shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“It is considered that sucrose is a limiting factor of the differentiation and elongation of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2123–2221 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

33 papers: 23 positive, 10 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

57 papers: 40 positive, 17 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

sucrose · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.