Paper · 2014 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Nitrogen Use Efficiency as Affected by Phosphorus and Potassium in Long-Term Rice and Wheat Experiments

Ying-hua DUAN; Xiao-jun SHI; Shuang-lai LI; et al.

18
claims
31
verbatim quotes
81
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Improving nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and decreasing N loss are critical to sustainable agriculture. The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of various fertilization regimes on yield, NUE, N agronomic efficiency (NAE) and N loss in long-term (16- or 24-yr) experiments carried out at three rice-wheat rotation sites (Chongqing, Suining and Wuchang) in subtropical China. Three treatments were examined: sole chemical N, N+phosphorus (NP), and NP+potassium (NPK) fertilizations. Grain yields at three sites were significantly increased by 9.3–81.6% (rice) and 54.5–93.8% (wheat) under NP compared with N alone, 1.7–9.8% (rice) and 0–17.6% (wheat) with NPK compared with NP. Compared to NP, NUE significantly increased for wheat at Chongqing (9.3%) and Wuchang (11.8%), but not at Suining, China. No changes in NUE were observed in rice between NP and NPK at all three sites. The rice-wheat rotation's NAE was 3.3 kg kg−1 higher under NPK than under NP at Chongqing, while NAE was similar for NP and NPK at Suining and Wuchang. We estimated that an uptake increase of 1.0 kg N ha−1 would increase 40 kg rice and 30 kg wheat ha−1. Nitrogen loss/input ratios were ∼60, ∼40 or ∼30% under N, NP or NPK at three sites, indicating significant decrease of N loss by P or PK additions. We attribute part of the increase in NUE soil N accumulation which significantly increased by 25–55 kg ha−1 yr−1 under NPK at three sites, whereas by 35 kg ha−1 yr−1 under NP at Chongqing only. This paper illustrates that apply P and K to wheat, and reduce K application to rice is an effective nutrient management strategy for both the NUE improvement and N losses reduction in China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NP increased rice yield by 9.3–81.6% relative to N alone.

Treatment
NPe0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.3–81.6%e0
Comparator
N alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields at three sites were significantly increased by 9.3–81.6% (rice) and 54.5–93.8% (wheat) under NP compared with N alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NP increased wheat yield by 54.5–93.8% relative to N alone.

Treatment
NPe0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
54.5–93.8%e0
Comparator
N alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields at three sites were significantly increased by 9.3–81.6% (rice) and 54.5–93.8% (wheat) under NP compared with N alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK raised rice yield by 1.7–9.8% relative to NP.

Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
Grain yieldse1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1.7–9.8%e0
Comparator
NPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1.7–9.8% (rice) and 0–17.6% (wheat) with NPK compared with NP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–694 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yields at three sites were significantly increased by 9.3–81.6% (rice) and 54.5–93.8% (wheat) under NP compared with N alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK raised wheat yield by 0–17.6% relative to NP.

Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
Grain yieldse1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
0–17.6%e0
Comparator
NPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1.7–9.8% (rice) and 0–17.6% (wheat) with NPK compared with NP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–694 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yields at three sites were significantly increased by 9.3–81.6% (rice) and 54.5–93.8% (wheat) under NP compared with N alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased wheat NUE by 9.3% relative to NP at Chongqing.

Treatment
NPKe1
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.3%e0
Comparator
NPe0
Setting
Chongqinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to NP, NUE significantly increased for wheat at Chongqing (9.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–769 · show in text ↑
e1

“1.7–9.8% (rice) and 0–17.6% (wheat) with NPK compared with NP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased wheat NUE by 11.8% relative to NP at Wuchang.

Treatment
NPKe1
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.8%e0
Comparator
NPe0
Setting
Wuchange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to NP, NUE significantly increased for wheat at Chongqing (9.3%) and Wuchang (11.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–789 · show in text ↑
e1

“1.7–9.8% (rice) and 0–17.6% (wheat) with NPK compared with NP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat NUE did not significantly increase with NPK at Suining.

Treatment
NPKe2
Outcome
NUEe1
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
NPe1
Setting
Suining, Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not at Suining, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–816 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to NP, NUE significantly increased for wheat at Chongqing (9.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–769 · show in text ↑
e2

“1.7–9.8% (rice) and 0–17.6% (wheat) with NPK compared with NP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice NUE did not change between NP and NPK at the three sites.

Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
No changese0
Qualifier
all three sitese0
Comparator
NPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No changes in NUE were observed in rice between NP and NPK at all three sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation NAE was 3.3 kg kg−1 higher under NPK than NP at Chongqing.

Taxon
rice-wheate0
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
NAEe0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.3 kg kg−1e0
Comparator
NPe0
Setting
Chongqinge0

Verbatim

e0

“The rice-wheat rotation's NAE was 3.3 kg kg−1 higher under NPK than under NP at Chongqing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation NAE was similar under NPK and NP at Suining and Wuchang.

Taxon
rice-wheate1
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
NAEe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
NPe0
Setting
Suining and Wuchange0

Verbatim

e0

“NAE was similar for NP and NPK at Suining and Wuchang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1047 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rice-wheat rotation's NAE was 3.3 kg kg−1 higher under NPK than under NP at Chongqing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–986 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated additional N uptake of 1.0 kg N ha−1 corresponded to 40 kg additional rice yield.

Compound
Ne0
Outcome
ricee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
40 kge0
Qualifier
1.0 kg N ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an uptake increase of 1.0 kg N ha−1 would increase 40 kg rice and 30 kg wheat ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1149 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated additional N uptake of 1.0 kg N ha−1 corresponded to 30 kg additional wheat yield.

Compound
Ne0
Outcome
wheate0
Direction
increasee0
Value
30 kg wheat ha−1e0
Qualifier
1.0 kg N ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an uptake increase of 1.0 kg N ha−1 would increase 40 kg rice and 30 kg wheat ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1149 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N loss to input ratios were approximately 60% under N.

Taxon
rice-wheate1
Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
Nitrogen loss/input ratiose0
Value
∼60e0

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen loss/input ratios were ∼60, ∼40 or ∼30% under N, NP or NPK at three sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1233 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rice-wheat rotation's NAE was 3.3 kg kg−1 higher under NPK than under NP at Chongqing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–986 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N loss to input ratios were approximately 40% under NP.

Taxon
rice-wheate1
Treatment
NPe0
Outcome
Nitrogen loss/input ratiose0
Value
∼40e0

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen loss/input ratios were ∼60, ∼40 or ∼30% under N, NP or NPK at three sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1233 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rice-wheat rotation's NAE was 3.3 kg kg−1 higher under NPK than under NP at Chongqing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–986 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N loss to input ratios were approximately 30% under NPK.

Taxon
rice-wheate1
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
Nitrogen loss/input ratiose0
Value
∼30%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen loss/input ratios were ∼60, ∼40 or ∼30% under N, NP or NPK at three sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1233 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rice-wheat rotation's NAE was 3.3 kg kg−1 higher under NPK than under NP at Chongqing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased soil N accumulation by 25–55 kg ha−1 yr−1 across three sites.

Taxon
rice-wheate1
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
soil N accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25–55 kg ha−1 yr−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soil N accumulation which significantly increased by 25–55 kg ha−1 yr−1 under NPK at three sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1436 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rice-wheat rotation's NAE was 3.3 kg kg−1 higher under NPK than under NP at Chongqing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP increased soil N accumulation by 35 kg ha−1 yr−1 at Chongqing only.

Taxon
rice-wheate1
Treatment
NPe0
Outcome
soil N accumulatione2
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
35 kg ha−1 yr−1e0
Setting
Chongqinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“whereas by 35 kg ha−1 yr−1 under NP at Chongqing only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1491 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rice-wheat rotation's NAE was 3.3 kg kg−1 higher under NPK than under NP at Chongqing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–986 · show in text ↑
e2

“soil N accumulation which significantly increased by 25–55 kg ha−1 yr−1 under NPK at three sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1436 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend P and K for wheat and less K for rice to improve NUE and reduce N loss.

Outcome
apply P and K to wheate0
Setting
Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apply P and K to wheat, and reduce K application to rice is an effective nutrient management strategy for both the NUE improvement and N losses reduction in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1683 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 142 positive, 34 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 202 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

475 papers: 419 positive, 56 negative or no effect

418 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

471 papers more in this group

See all 475 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.