Paper · 2009 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Effect of Irrigation Scheduling and Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield of Rice -Wheat System and Properties of a Reclaimed Sodic Soil

Ranbir Singh; Y. Singh; N.P.S. Yaduvanshi; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Central Soil Salinity Research Institute Regional Research Station, Lucknow during 1999–2002. Effect of irrigation scheduling and integrated use of organic manure and inorganic fertilizers for maximizing yields of rice-wheat cropping system in the gypsum-amended sodic soils was studied. Grain yield of rice was significantly higher under continuous submergence over the irrigation at 4 days after disappearance of pounded water (DADPW). However, the grain yield with 2 - DADPW was at par with continuous submergence. The growth and yield of rice were significantly higher under 100% NPK + green manure dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata) followed by 100% NPK + 10 t sulphitation pressmud cake (SPMC) ha−1 in comparison to other treatments under continuous submergence and 2-DADPW. Irrigation amounting to 57.5 cm at 2 -DADPW saved 24% of water over the continuous submergence without reducing the grain yield. Growth and yield of wheat were significantly higher with the application of 100% NPK with residual effect of green manure (T5) followed by SPMC in comparison to other treatments. Wheat yield was higher with 4 irrigations applied at critical root initiation (CRI), tillering (T), jointing (J) and milking (M) stages as compared to 3 irrigations at CRI, T and M stages. Integrated use of inorganic fertilizers and organic manures reduced soil pH from initial 10.2 to 9.0 in 0 -15 cm soil layer. Organic carbon content (2.6 g kg−1) and infiltration rate of (1.5 mm h−1) were higher in case of 100% NPK + green manuring.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of rice was significantly higher under continuous submergence than under irrigation at 4 days after disappearance of pounded water.

Treatment
continuous submergencee0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
irrigation at 4 days after disappearance of pounded water (DADPW)e0
Setting
Lucknowe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of rice was significantly higher under continuous submergence over the irrigation at 4 days after disappearance of pounded water (DADPW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–476 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted at the Central Soil Salinity Research Institute Regional Research Station, Lucknow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice grain yield under 2 - DADPW irrigation was at par with continuous submergence.

Treatment
2 - DADPWe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
at pare1
Comparator
continuous submergencee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of rice was significantly higher under continuous submergence over the irrigation at 4 days after disappearance of pounded water (DADPW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–476 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, the grain yield with 2 - DADPW was at par with continuous submergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield of rice were significantly higher under 100% NPK with dhaincha green manure than under other treatments.

Treatment
100% NPK + green manure dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata)e0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and yield of rice were significantly higher under 100% NPK + green manure dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata) followed by 100% NPK + 10 t sulphitation pressmud cake (SPMC) ha−1 in comparison to other treatments under continuous submergence and 2-DADPW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 2 -DADPW saved 24% of water over continuous submergence without reducing rice grain yield.

Treatment
Irrigation amounting to 57.5 cm at 2 -DADPWe1
Outcome
watere1
Direction
savede1
Value
24%e1
Comparator
continuous submergencee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of rice was significantly higher under continuous submergence over the irrigation at 4 days after disappearance of pounded water (DADPW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–476 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation amounting to 57.5 cm at 2 -DADPW saved 24% of water over the continuous submergence without reducing the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield of wheat were significantly higher under 100% NPK with residual green manure effect than under other treatments.

Treatment
100% NPK with residual effect of green manure (T5)e0
Outcome
Growth and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and yield of wheat were significantly higher with the application of 100% NPK with residual effect of green manure (T5) followed by SPMC in comparison to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was higher with 4 irrigations than with 3 irrigations.

Treatment
4 irrigations applied at critical root initiation (CRI), tillering (T), jointing (J) and milking (M) stagese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
3 irrigations at CRI, T and M stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yield was higher with 4 irrigations applied at critical root initiation (CRI), tillering (T), jointing (J) and milking (M) stages as compared to 3 irrigations at CRI, T and M stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated use of inorganic fertilizers and organic manures reduced soil pH from 10.2 to 9.0 in the rice-wheat system.

Taxon
rice-wheat cropping systeme0
Treatment
Integrated use of inorganic fertilizers and organic manurese1
Outcome
soil pHe1
Direction
reducede1
Value
from initial 10.2 to 9.0e1
Qualifier
in 0 -15 cm soil layere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yields of rice-wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–280 · show in text ↑
e1

“Integrated use of inorganic fertilizers and organic manures reduced soil pH from initial 10.2 to 9.0 in 0 -15 cm soil layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic carbon content was higher under 100% NPK with green manuring in the rice-wheat system soil.

Taxon
rice-wheat cropping systeme0
Treatment
100% NPK + green manuringe1
Outcome
Organic carbon contente1
Direction
highere1
Value
2.6 g kg−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yields of rice-wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–280 · show in text ↑
e1

“Organic carbon content (2.6 g kg−1) and infiltration rate of (1.5 mm h−1) were higher in case of 100% NPK + green manuring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infiltration rate was higher under 100% NPK with green manuring in the rice-wheat system soil.

Taxon
rice-wheat cropping systeme0
Treatment
100% NPK + green manuringe1
Outcome
infiltration ratee1
Direction
highere1
Value
1.5 mm h−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yields of rice-wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–280 · show in text ↑
e1

“Organic carbon content (2.6 g kg−1) and infiltration rate of (1.5 mm h−1) were higher in case of 100% NPK + green manuring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1559 · show in text ↑

Sesbania bispinosa · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.