Abstract
The field experiment conducted on integrated nutrition of potassium, magnesium, sulphur and zinc along with azotobacterization of seeds of wheat var. HD 2285 during rabi season of 1998–1999 and 1999–2000 at Fertilizer Research Farm, Pura (Kanpur Nagar), C.S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur showed conspicuous and significant effect on yield, content and uptake of nutrients and quality characteristics i.e. protein, lysine and starch. The grain yield obtained with the integrated use of 40 kg K2O + 30 kg Mg + 40 kg S + 5.25 kg Zn per hectare along with azotobacterization was found to be 51.57 and 48.95 per cent higher than lowest grain yield at control during 1998–1999 and 1999–2000, respectively. Likewise, straw yield in this combination was found to be 71.41 and 83.87 per cent higher than at control during 1998–1999 and 1999–2000, respectively. Content and uptake of N, P, K, S, Mg and Zn were also recorded higher with 40 kg K2O + 30 kg Mg + 40 kg S + 5.25 kg Zn along with azotobacterization in comparison to other treatments. Integrated application of nutrients along with azotobacterization of seeds also caused beneficial and significant effect on protein and starch contents. Lysine content, in general, decreased up to T3 but increased at T4i.e. maximum integration in comparison to control
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield with the integrated nutrient treatment with azotobacterization was 51.57 and 48.95 per cent higher than the lowest control yield in 1998-1999 and 1999-2000.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- 40 kg K2O + 30 kg Mg + 40 kg S + 5.25 kg Zn per hectare along with azotobacterizatione2
- Outcome
- grain yielde3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 51.57 and 48.95 per cente3
- Qualifier
- 1998–1999 and 1999–2000e3
- Comparator
- controle3
- Setting
- field experimente1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“azotobacterization of seeds of wheat var. HD 2285”
e1“The field experiment conducted on integrated nutrition”
e2“40 kg K2O + 30 kg Mg + 40 kg S + 5.25 kg Zn per hectare along with azotobacterization”
e3“The grain yield obtained with the integrated use of 40 kg K2O + 30 kg Mg + 40 kg S + 5.25 kg Zn per hectare along with azotobacterization was found to be 51.57 and 48.95 per cent higher than lowest grain yield at control during 1998–1999 and 1999–2000”
Claim · model-written summary
Straw yield with the integrated nutrient treatment with azotobacterization was 71.41 and 83.87 per cent higher than control in 1998-1999 and 1999-2000.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 40 kg K2O + 30 kg Mg + 40 kg S + 5.25 kg Zn per hectare along with azotobacterizatione2
- Outcome
- straw yielde4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 71.41 and 83.87 per cente4
- Qualifier
- 1998–1999 and 1999–2000e4
- Comparator
- controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“azotobacterization of seeds of wheat var. HD 2285”
e2“40 kg K2O + 30 kg Mg + 40 kg S + 5.25 kg Zn per hectare along with azotobacterization”
e4“straw yield in this combination was found to be 71.41 and 83.87 per cent higher than at control during 1998–1999 and 1999–2000”
Claim · model-written summary
Content and uptake of N, P, K, S, Mg and Zn were higher with the integrated treatment with azotobacterization than with other treatments.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 40 kg K2O + 30 kg Mg + 40 kg S + 5.25 kg Zn along with azotobacterizatione5
- Outcome
- Content and uptake of N, P, K, S, Mg and Zne5
- Direction
- highere5
- Comparator
- other treatmentse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“azotobacterization of seeds of wheat var. HD 2285”
e5“Content and uptake of N, P, K, S, Mg and Zn were also recorded higher with 40 kg K2O + 30 kg Mg + 40 kg S + 5.25 kg Zn along with azotobacterization in comparison to other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient application with azotobacterization of seeds had a beneficial and significant effect on protein and starch contents of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Integrated application of nutrients along with azotobacterization of seedse6
- Outcome
- protein and starch contentse6
- Direction
- beneficiale6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“azotobacterization of seeds of wheat var. HD 2285”
e6“Integrated application of nutrients along with azotobacterization of seeds also caused beneficial and significant effect on protein and starch contents”
Claim · model-written summary
Lysine content decreased in wheat up to the T3 integrated treatment.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- T3e7
- Outcome
- Lysine contente7
- Direction
- decreasede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“azotobacterization of seeds of wheat var. HD 2285”
e7“Lysine content, in general, decreased up to T3 but increased at T4i.e. maximum integration in comparison to control”
Claim · model-written summary
Lysine content increased in wheat at the maximum integration treatment compared with control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- maximum integratione7
- Outcome
- Lysine contente7
- Direction
- increasede7
- Comparator
- controle7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“azotobacterization of seeds of wheat var. HD 2285”
e7“Lysine content, in general, decreased up to T3 but increased at T4i.e. maximum integration in comparison to control”
The same questions in other papers
magnesium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
376 papers more in this group
See all 380 papers →zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →magnesium atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →potassium · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
78 papers more in this group
See all 82 papers →potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
226 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
253 papers more in this group
See all 257 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.