Abstract
A field experiment was conducted on sandy loam soil at Lamphelpat, Manipur during kharif seasons of 2013 and 2014 to assess the effect of soil amendments and micronutrients fortification on productivity and quality of rice. The experiment was laid outin split plot design with foursoil amendmenttreatments in the main plots and fourmicronutrients fortification treatments in the sub-plots. The results showed that application FYM 5.0 t/ha, lime 200 and 400 kg/ha improved growth attributes and increased yield components of rice over those of the control plots. Use of lime 400 kg/ha recorded highest rice grain (7.16 t/ha) and straw (8.95 t/ha) yields as compared to the other soil amendment practices. It also recorded higher N, P, K, Zn, Fe and Se contents in rice grain, greater returns and higher crop profitability (Rs. 1240/ha/day) than those of control plots, but comparable to the other soil amendment practices. Soil amendments (5 t/ha FYM, 200 and 400 kg/ha lime) significantly increased the available N, P, K, Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu content in soil over those of the control plots. Micronutrient fortification also improved growth, increased productivity and nutrient contents in rice grain and enhanced gross and net returns, returns per rupee invested and crop profitability.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
FYM 5.0 t/ha and lime 200 and 400 kg/ha improved growth attributes of rice compared with control plots.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- FYM 5.0 t/ha, lime 200 and 400 kg/hae1
- Outcome
- growth attributese1
- Direction
- improvede1
- Comparator
- control plotse1
- Setting
- Lamphelpat, Manipure0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e0“A field experiment was conducted on sandy loam soil at Lamphelpat, Manipur during kharif seasons of 2013 and 2014”
e1“application FYM 5.0 t/ha, lime 200 and 400 kg/ha improved growth attributes and increased yield components of rice over those of the control plots”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM 5.0 t/ha and lime 200 and 400 kg/ha increased yield components of rice compared with control plots.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- FYM 5.0 t/ha, lime 200 and 400 kg/hae1
- Outcome
- yield componentse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- control plotse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e1“application FYM 5.0 t/ha, lime 200 and 400 kg/ha improved growth attributes and increased yield components of rice over those of the control plots”
Claim · model-written summary
Lime 400 kg/ha gave the highest rice grain yield, 7.16 t/ha, compared with the other soil amendment practices.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- lime 400 kg/hae2
- Outcome
- rice graine2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 7.16 t/hae2
- Comparator
- other soil amendment practicese2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e2“Use of lime 400 kg/ha recorded highest rice grain (7.16 t/ha) and straw (8.95 t/ha) yields as compared to the other soil amendment practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Lime 400 kg/ha gave the highest straw yield, 8.95 t/ha, compared with the other soil amendment practices.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- lime 400 kg/hae2
- Outcome
- strawe2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 8.95 t/hae2
- Comparator
- other soil amendment practicese2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e2“Use of lime 400 kg/ha recorded highest rice grain (7.16 t/ha) and straw (8.95 t/ha) yields as compared to the other soil amendment practices”
Claim · model-written summary
The unspecified treatment gave higher N, P and K contents in rice grain than control plots.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Outcome
- N, P, Ke3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- control plotse3
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e3“It also recorded higher N, P, K, Zn, Fe and Se contents in rice grain, greater returns and higher crop profitability (Rs. 1240/ha/day) than those of control plots, but comparable to the other soil amendment practices”
Claim · model-written summary
The unspecified treatment gave higher Zn, Fe and Se contents in rice grain than control plots.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Outcome
- Zn, Fe and See3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- control plotse3
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e3“It also recorded higher N, P, K, Zn, Fe and Se contents in rice grain, greater returns and higher crop profitability (Rs. 1240/ha/day) than those of control plots, but comparable to the other soil amendment practices”
Claim · model-written summary
The unspecified treatment gave greater returns than control plots, comparable to the other soil amendment practices.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Outcome
- returnse3
- Direction
- greatere3
- Qualifier
- but comparable to the other soil amendment practicese3
- Comparator
- control plotse3
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e3“It also recorded higher N, P, K, Zn, Fe and Se contents in rice grain, greater returns and higher crop profitability (Rs. 1240/ha/day) than those of control plots, but comparable to the other soil amendment practices”
Claim · model-written summary
The unspecified treatment gave higher crop profitability, Rs. 1240/ha/day, than control plots.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Outcome
- crop profitabilitye3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- Rs. 1240/ha/daye3
- Comparator
- control plotse3
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e3“It also recorded higher N, P, K, Zn, Fe and Se contents in rice grain, greater returns and higher crop profitability (Rs. 1240/ha/day) than those of control plots, but comparable to the other soil amendment practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil amendments significantly increased available N, P and K in soil compared with control plots.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Soil amendments (5 t/ha FYM, 200 and 400 kg/ha lime)e4
- Outcome
- available N, P, Ke4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Comparator
- control plotse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e4“Soil amendments (5 t/ha FYM, 200 and 400 kg/ha lime) significantly increased the available N, P, K, Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu content in soil over those of the control plots”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil amendments significantly increased available Fe, Zn and Mn in soil compared with control plots.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Soil amendments (5 t/ha FYM, 200 and 400 kg/ha lime)e4
- Outcome
- Fe, Zn, Mne4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Comparator
- control plotse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e4“Soil amendments (5 t/ha FYM, 200 and 400 kg/ha lime) significantly increased the available N, P, K, Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu content in soil over those of the control plots”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil amendments significantly increased available Cu in soil compared with control plots.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Soil amendments (5 t/ha FYM, 200 and 400 kg/ha lime)e4
- Outcome
- Cue4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Comparator
- control plotse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e4“Soil amendments (5 t/ha FYM, 200 and 400 kg/ha lime) significantly increased the available N, P, K, Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu content in soil over those of the control plots”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient fortification improved growth of rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Micronutrient fortificatione5
- Outcome
- growthe5
- Direction
- improvede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e5“Micronutrient fortification also improved growth, increased productivity and nutrient contents in rice grain and enhanced gross and net returns, returns per rupee invested and crop profitability”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient fortification increased productivity of rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Micronutrient fortificatione5
- Outcome
- productivitye5
- Direction
- increasede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e5“Micronutrient fortification also improved growth, increased productivity and nutrient contents in rice grain and enhanced gross and net returns, returns per rupee invested and crop profitability”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient fortification increased nutrient contents in rice grain.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Micronutrient fortificatione5
- Outcome
- nutrient contents in rice graine5
- Direction
- increasede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e5“Micronutrient fortification also improved growth, increased productivity and nutrient contents in rice grain and enhanced gross and net returns, returns per rupee invested and crop profitability”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient fortification enhanced gross and net returns from rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Micronutrient fortificatione5
- Outcome
- gross and net returnse5
- Direction
- enhancede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e5“Micronutrient fortification also improved growth, increased productivity and nutrient contents in rice grain and enhanced gross and net returns, returns per rupee invested and crop profitability”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient fortification enhanced returns per rupee invested and crop profitability of rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Micronutrient fortificatione5
- Outcome
- returns per rupee invested and crop profitabilitye5
- Direction
- enhancede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Productivity and quality enhancement of rice”
e5“Micronutrient fortification also improved growth, increased productivity and nutrient contents in rice grain and enhanced gross and net returns, returns per rupee invested and crop profitability”
The same questions in other papers
micronutrient · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →lime · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
132 papers more in this group
See all 136 papers →lime · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →micronutrient · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →lime · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →lime · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →other · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
755 papers more in this group
See all 759 papers →8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.