Paper · 2011 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Effects of sulphur application on accumulations of carbon,nitrogen and sulphur and grain yield of winter wheat under different irrigation conditions

Yingxin Xie

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Irrigation plays an important role in increasing crop production in China.However,sulphur(S) is another essential element in plant nutrition.Under some stress conditions,such as low mineral content in soils,soil erosion and high nutrient removal by crops may cause S deficiency in crops.Most of previous studies focused on effects of S on yield and quality for wheat.The aims of this study were to analyze the effects of S and irrigation(W) and their interaction on accumulation of dry matter during wheat growth period,and distributions of carbon(C),nitrogen(N) and S at the maturity,and grain yield and its main components at the harvest.Two medium-gluten wheat cultivars(a multiple spike Yunong 949 and a large spike Lankao Aizao 8) were used in field experiments with different S and W treatments in 2009-2010 wheat growing season.The results show that the dry matter accumulations of the two cultivars under the S60 treatments are significantly higher than those of the S0 treatments at the anthesis and maturity stages with the increasing of irrigation times.Comparing with S0,organ dry matter weights at the maturity are increased under the irrigation combined with S application,and the increased grain weight is higher than those of the other organs,but no significant differences in the dry matter distribution among the organs.The S application could increase the contents of N and S in grain,but the N contents of grain and vegetative organs are decreased with the increase of irrigation times.With the increase of irrigation times,the S application promotes grain-number per spike,1000-grain weight and grain yield,and their maximum values are reached under the S60W2 treatment.Especially,the grain yield of S60W2 is increased by 34.29% compared to the S0W0 treatment,and the yield of Yunong949 is significantly higher than that of Lankao Aizao8.In conclusion,S60W1 or S60W2 in the study could increase dry matter accumulations,the contents of C,N and S,and gain yields of two winter wheat cultivars,but some differences exist in the cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S60 significantly increased dry-matter accumulation over S0 at anthesis and maturity as irrigation increased.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
anthesis and maturity stagese0
Treatment
S60 treatmentse0
Outcome
dry matter accumulationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
S0 treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter accumulations of the two cultivars under the S60 treatments are significantly higher than those of the S0 treatments at the anthesis and maturity stages with the increasing of irrigation times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation plus sulfur increased organ dry-matter weights at maturity relative to S0.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
maturitye0
Treatment
irrigation combined with S applicatione0
Outcome
organ dry matter weightse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
S0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing with S0,organ dry matter weights at the maturity are increased under the irrigation combined with S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain dry-weight increase exceeded other organs under irrigation and sulfur.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation combined with S applicatione1
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other organse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increased grain weight is higher than those of the other organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1258 · show in text ↑
e1

“organ dry matter weights at the maturity are increased under the irrigation combined with S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry-matter distribution among organs showed no significant difference.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
organse0
Outcome
dry matter distributione0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences in the dry matter distribution among the organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application increased grain nitrogen and sulfur contents.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
S applicatione0
Outcome
contents of N and S in graine0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The S application could increase the contents of N and S in grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More irrigation decreased grain nitrogen content.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
increase of irrigation timese0
Outcome
N contents of graine0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the N contents of grain and vegetative organs are decreased with the increase of irrigation times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More irrigation decreased vegetative-organ nitrogen content.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
vegetative organse0
Treatment
increase of irrigation timese0
Outcome
N contents of grain and vegetative organse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the N contents of grain and vegetative organs are decreased with the increase of irrigation times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under increasing irrigation, sulfur application promoted grains per spike, thousand-grain weight and yield, maximized at S60W2.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
S applicatione0
Outcome
grain-number per spike,1000-grain weight and grain yielde0
Direction
promotese0
Qualifier
S60W2 treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of irrigation times,the S application promotes grain-number per spike,1000-grain weight and grain yield,and their maximum values are reached under the S60W2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1690 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S60W2 raised grain yield by 34.29% relative to S0W0.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
S60W2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
34.29%e0
Comparator
S0W0 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield of S60W2 is increased by 34.29% compared to the S0W0 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1780 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yunong949 yielded significantly more than Lankao Aizao8.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Yunong949e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Lankao Aizao8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of Yunong949 is significantly higher than that of Lankao Aizao8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1858 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded S60W1 or S60W2 increased dry matter and carbon, nitrogen and sulfur contents and grain yields, with cultivar differences.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
S60W1 or S60W2e0
Qualifier
some differences exist in the cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S60W1 or S60W2 in the study could increase dry matter accumulations,the contents of C,N and S,and gain yields of two winter wheat cultivars,but some differences exist in the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–2056 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

sulfur atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 74 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 74 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.