Abstract
By the ‘Zuirenxiang’ grape as material,on the basis of base fertilizers in the autumn,through the 5 different treatments in the leaf expansion as DAP 0.5 kg,0.75 kg,1.0 kg and 0.6 kg bags controlled release fertilizer and no fertilizer to research the effects of yield and quality on ‘Zuirenxiang’ grape.The results showed that,compared with CK,all treatments could increase the yield and quality grape in varying degrees.Among them,the bags of controlled release fertilizer was the best,all observation items,including shoot diameter,single fruit weight,plant yield,soluble solids,organic acids and sugar acid ratio,were reached 9.7 mm,9.7 g,4.37 kg,21.1% and 47.85 respectively,compared with CK it improved 1.6 mm,1.9 g,0.66 kg,1.0% and 5.87 respectively,had significant difference.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
The results showed that,compared with CK,all treatments could increase the yield and quality grape in varying degrees.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that,compared with CK,all treatments could increase the yield and quality grape in varying degrees.”
Claim · model-written summary
Among them,the bags of controlled release fertilizer was the best,all observation items,including shoot diameter,single fruit weight,plant yield,soluble solids,organic acids and sugar acid ratio,were reached 9.7 mm,9.7 g,4.37 kg,21.1% and 47.85 respectively,compared with CK it improved 1.6 mm,1.9 g,0.66 kg,1.0% and 5.87 respectively,had significant difference.
Verbatim
e0“Among them,the bags of controlled release fertilizer was the best,all observation items,including shoot diameter,single fruit weight,plant yield,soluble solids,organic acids and sugar acid ratio,were reached 9.7 mm,9.7 g,4.37 kg,21.1% and 47.85 respectively,compared with CK it improved 1.6 mm,1.9 g,0.66 kg,1.0% and 5.87 respectively,had significant difference.”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Among them,the bags of controlled release fertilizer was the best,all observation items,including shoot diameter,single fruit weight,plant yield,soluble solids,organic acids and sugar acid ratio,were reached 9.7 mm,9.7 g,4.37 kg,21.1% and 47.85 respectively,compared with CK it improved 1.6 mm,1.9 g,0.66 kg,1.0% and 5.87 respectively,had significant difference.
Verbatim
e0“Among them,the bags of controlled release fertilizer was the best,all observation items,including shoot diameter,single fruit weight,plant yield,soluble solids,organic acids and sugar acid ratio,were reached 9.7 mm,9.7 g,4.37 kg,21.1% and 47.85 respectively,compared with CK it improved 1.6 mm,1.9 g,0.66 kg,1.0% and 5.87 respectively,had significant difference.”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Among them,the bags of controlled release fertilizer was the best,all observation items,including shoot diameter,single fruit weight,plant yield,soluble solids,organic acids and sugar acid ratio,were reached 9.7 mm,9.7 g,4.37 kg,21.1% and 47.85 respectively,compared with CK it improved 1.6 mm,1.9 g,0.66 kg,1.0% and 5.87 respectively,had significant difference.
Verbatim
e0“Among them,the bags of controlled release fertilizer was the best,all observation items,including shoot diameter,single fruit weight,plant yield,soluble solids,organic acids and sugar acid ratio,were reached 9.7 mm,9.7 g,4.37 kg,21.1% and 47.85 respectively,compared with CK it improved 1.6 mm,1.9 g,0.66 kg,1.0% and 5.87 respectively,had significant difference.”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Among them,the bags of controlled release fertilizer was the best,all observation items,including shoot diameter,single fruit weight,plant yield,soluble solids,organic acids and sugar acid ratio,were reached 9.7 mm,9.7 g,4.37 kg,21.1% and 47.85 respectively,compared with CK it improved 1.6 mm,1.9 g,0.66 kg,1.0% and 5.87 respectively,had significant difference.
Verbatim
e0“Among them,the bags of controlled release fertilizer was the best,all observation items,including shoot diameter,single fruit weight,plant yield,soluble solids,organic acids and sugar acid ratio,were reached 9.7 mm,9.7 g,4.37 kg,21.1% and 47.85 respectively,compared with CK it improved 1.6 mm,1.9 g,0.66 kg,1.0% and 5.87 respectively,had significant difference.”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Among them,the bags of controlled release fertilizer was the best,all observation items,including shoot diameter,single fruit weight,plant yield,soluble solids,organic acids and sugar acid ratio,were reached 9.7 mm,9.7 g,4.37 kg,21.1% and 47.85 respectively,compared with CK it improved 1.6 mm,1.9 g,0.66 kg,1.0% and 5.87 respectively,had significant difference.
Verbatim
e0“Among them,the bags of controlled release fertilizer was the best,all observation items,including shoot diameter,single fruit weight,plant yield,soluble solids,organic acids and sugar acid ratio,were reached 9.7 mm,9.7 g,4.37 kg,21.1% and 47.85 respectively,compared with CK it improved 1.6 mm,1.9 g,0.66 kg,1.0% and 5.87 respectively,had significant difference.”
t0“Grape”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →fertilization · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.