Paper · 2014

Effects of Postponing Nitrogen Application and Spraying Foliar 6-BA after Anthesis on Grain Yield and Quality of Winter Wheat

WU Jin-don

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment with split plot design was carried out to study effects of postponing nitrogen application and spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesis on grain yield and quality of winter wheat in 2010- 2011 growing seasons using the variety of Yannong 19 with the total amount of nitrogen being 240 kg hm- 2. The results showed that both postponing nitrogen application and spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesis improved activities of GS,GPT,SSS in grain of winter wheat significantly,while had no significant effect on GBSS activity in grain of winter wheat. Postponing nitrogen application significantly improved grains per spike,1000- grain weight and grain yield,and spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesis significantly increased 1000- grain weight and grain yield. Both postponing nitrogen application and spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesis improved protein content and each protein ingredient content,Glu / Gli ratio,protein accumulation,starch content, amylopectin content, amylopectin / amylose ratio and starch accumulation in grain significantly. Spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesis promoted the effects of postponing nitrogen application. Under the condition of this experiment,the treatment B1N4( base fertilizer: elongation fertilizer: booting fertilizer = 3: 5: 2, spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesis with the concentration of 10 mg L- 1and the volume of 100mL m- 2) had the optimal effect on the improvement of the yield and quality of winter wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed nitrogen application and foliar 6-BA each significantly increased grain GS, GPT and SSS activities.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
postponing nitrogen application and spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesise0
Outcome
activities of GS,GPT,SSSe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both postponing nitrogen application and spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesis improved activities of GS,GPT,SSS in grain of winter wheat significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither treatment significantly changed grain GBSS activity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
GBSS activitye0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while had no significant effect on GBSS activity in grain of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed nitrogen application significantly improved grains per spike, 1000-grain weight and grain yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Postponing nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
grains per spike,1000- grain weight and grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postponing nitrogen application significantly improved grains per spike,1000- grain weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 6-BA significantly increased 1000-grain weight and yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesise0
Outcome
1000- grain weight and grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesis significantly increased 1000- grain weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both treatments significantly improved grain protein content, ingredients, Glu/Gli ratio and protein accumulation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
postponing nitrogen application and spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesise0
Outcome
protein content and each protein ingredient content,Glu / Gli ratio,protein accumulatione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both postponing nitrogen application and spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesis improved protein content and each protein ingredient content,Glu / Gli ratio,protein accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both treatments significantly improved grain starch content, amylopectin content, amylopectin/amylose ratio and starch accumulation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
postponing nitrogen application and spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesise0
Outcome
starch content, amylopectin content, amylopectin / amylose ratio and starch accumulatione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both postponing nitrogen application and spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesis improved protein content and each protein ingredient content,Glu / Gli ratio,protein accumulation,starch content, amylopectin content, amylopectin / amylose ratio and starch accumulation in grain significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 6-BA enhanced the effects of delayed nitrogen application.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesise0
Outcome
effects of postponing nitrogen applicatione0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesis promoted the effects of postponing nitrogen application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The B1N4 treatment was optimal for winter wheat yield and quality improvement under these experimental conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
B1N4e0
Outcome
yield and qualitye0
Direction
optimale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment B1N4( base fertilizer: elongation fertilizer: booting fertilizer = 3: 5: 2, spraying foliar 6- BA after anthesis with the concentration of 10 mg L- 1and the volume of 100mL m- 2) had the optimal effect on the improvement of the yield and quality of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1465 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

N-benzyladenine · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

N-benzyladenine · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

N-benzyladenine · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

application · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 26 positive, 2 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 26 positive, 11 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.