Paper · 1997 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Effects of Some Polyamine Biosynthesis Inhibitors and Calcium Chloride on In Vitro Growth and Decay Development in Apples Caused by Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum

Robert A. Saftner; William S. Conway; Carl E. Sams

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Three polyamine biosynthesis inhibitors, α-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), α-difluoromethylarginine (DFMA), and α-methylornithine (MeOrn), alone and in combination with CaCl 2 , were tested for their ability to reduce in vitro growth and soft rot development in apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) fruit caused by Botrytis cinerea Pers.:Fr. and Penicillium expansum Link. All three inhibitors reduced the in vitro growth of the pathogens. Calcium had no effect on fungal growth in vitro. Pressure infiltration of millimolar concentrations of DFMO or DFMA or 25 g·L -1 CaCl 2 solutions into apples reduced subsequent soft rot development by B. cinerea and P. expansum >40%. A combination treatment of Ca and DFMO or DFMA reduced decay >67%. Treatment of apples with MeOrn was less effective at inhibiting decay development. None of the inhibitors affected polyamine levels in apple cortical tissues. Some injury to the fruit surface was observed with Ca treatments. Fruit treated with Ca and any of the inhibitors were less firm than those treated with Ca alone. Specific polyamine biosynthesis inhibitors in combination with Ca may prove useful in reducing postharvest decay in apples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three polyamine biosynthesis inhibitors reduced the in vitro growth of Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum.

Treatment
All three inhibitorse0
Interactor
pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
in vitro growth of the pathogense0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All three inhibitors reduced the in vitro growth of the pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium had no effect on the in vitro growth of the fungal pathogens.

Treatment
Calciume0
Outcome
fungal growth in vitroe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium had no effect on fungal growth in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pressure infiltration of millimolar concentrations of DFMO or DFMA into apples reduced subsequent soft rot development by B. cinerea and P. expansum by more than 40%.

Treatment
Pressure infiltration of millimolar concentrations of DFMO or DFMAe0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Second interactor
P. expansumPenicillium expansume0pathogen
Outcome
soft rot developmente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
>40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium expansum
Penicillium expansum · Second interactorH.J. Larsen, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pressure infiltration of millimolar concentrations of DFMO or DFMA or 25 g·L -1 CaCl 2 solutions into apples reduced subsequent soft rot development by B. cinerea and P. expansum >40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pressure infiltration of 25 g/L CaCl2 solution into apples reduced subsequent soft rot development by B. cinerea and P. expansum by more than 40%.

Treatment
25 g·L -1 CaCl 2 solutionse0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Second interactor
P. expansumPenicillium expansume0pathogen
Outcome
soft rot developmente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
>40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium expansum
Penicillium expansum · Second interactorH.J. Larsen, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pressure infiltration of millimolar concentrations of DFMO or DFMA or 25 g·L -1 CaCl 2 solutions into apples reduced subsequent soft rot development by B. cinerea and P. expansum >40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A combination treatment of Ca and DFMO or DFMA reduced decay in apples by more than 67%.

Treatment
combination treatment of Ca and DFMO or DFMAe0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
>67%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“A combination treatment of Ca and DFMO or DFMA reduced decay >67%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment of apples with MeOrn was less effective at inhibiting decay development.

Treatment
MeOrne0
Outcome
decay developmente0
Direction
less effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of apples with MeOrn was less effective at inhibiting decay development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the inhibitors changed polyamine levels in apple cortical tissues.

Organ / stage
cortical tissuese0
Treatment
the inhibitorse0
Outcome
polyamine levelse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of the inhibitors affected polyamine levels in apple cortical tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some injury to the fruit surface of apples was observed with Ca treatments.

Treatment
Ca treatmentse0
Outcome
injury to the fruit surfacee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Some injury to the fruit surface was observed with Ca treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit treated with Ca and any of the inhibitors were less firm than fruit treated with Ca alone.

Treatment
Ca and any of the inhibitorse0
Outcome
firme0
Direction
less firme0
Comparator
Ca alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit treated with Ca and any of the inhibitors were less firm than those treated with Ca alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1056 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that specific polyamine biosynthesis inhibitors combined with Ca may be useful in reducing postharvest decay in apples.

Outcome
reducing postharvest decaye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Specific polyamine biosynthesis inhibitors in combination with Ca may prove useful in reducing postharvest decay in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1180 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

39 papers: 28 positive, 11 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

calcium atom · crop injury · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

calcium dichloride · Botrytis cinerea · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.