Paper · 2018 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Control of Phalaris minor with sequential application of pre-and postemergence herbicides and herbicide combinations in wheat

Raminder Kaur Hundal; B.S. Dhillon

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The field efficacy of pre-and post-emergence herbicides and rotational use of different group of herbicides were tested against Phalaris minor in wheat on farmers’ fields during the year 2015–16 and 2016–17. Clodinafop is being used by 64% farmers at Makowal and 44% at village Mallu Nangal from the last five years. None of the farmer was using pre-emergence herbicide. The higher herbicide dose (76% at site I and 80% at site II) coupled with hallow cone nozzle and less quantity of water (200–225 l/ha) resulted in poor control of P.minor. At site I, continuous use of clodinafop resulted in poor weed control efficiency (58.7%) with lower grain yield (4.46 t/ha). Sequential application of preemergence herbicide pendimethalin followed by post-emergence application of clodinafop provided effective control of P.minor (WCE 76.8%) and significantly higher yield (5.1 t/ha) over the existing farmers’ practices (2 sprays of clodinafop at 45 and 65 DAS). At the second site, compared to clodinafop with pendimethalin, mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron, fenoxaprop + metribuzin or sulfosulfuron resulted into higher yield with effective weed control efficiency. Highest yield was recorded with spray of mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron (5.1 t/ha) which was statistically at par with pendimethalin (5.06 t/ha), fenoxaprop+ metribuzin (5.01 t/ha) and sulfosulfuron at 15 DAS (4.98 t/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High herbicide dose with a hollow cone nozzle and low water volume produced poor Phalaris minor control.

Treatment
higher herbicide dose (76% at site I and 80% at site II) coupled with hallow cone nozzle and less quantity of water (200–225 l/ha)e0
Interactor
P.minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control of P.minore0
Direction
poore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“The higher herbicide dose (76% at site I and 80% at site II) coupled with hallow cone nozzle and less quantity of water (200–225 l/ha) resulted in poor control of P.minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–541 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous clodinafop had poor weed control efficiency of 58.7% at site I.

Treatment
continuous use of clodinafope0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
poore0
Value
58.7%e0
Setting
site Ie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“At site I, continuous use of clodinafop resulted in poor weed control efficiency (58.7%) with lower grain yield (4.46 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous clodinafop yielded 4.46 t/ha at site I, described as lower grain yield.

Treatment
continuous use of clodinafope0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
4.46 t/hae0
Setting
site Ie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“At site I, continuous use of clodinafop resulted in poor weed control efficiency (58.7%) with lower grain yield (4.46 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by clodinafop achieved 76.8% weed control efficiency at site I.

Treatment
pendimethalin followed by post-emergence application of clodinafope0
Interactor
P.minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control of P.minore0
Direction
effectivee0
Value
76.8%e0
Comparator
existing farmers’ practices (2 sprays of clodinafop at 45 and 65 DAS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sequential application of preemergence herbicide pendimethalin followed by post-emergence application of clodinafop provided effective control of P.minor (WCE 76.8%) and significantly higher yield (5.1 t/ha) over the existing farmers’ practices (2 sprays of clodinafop at 45 and 65 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by clodinafop raised wheat yield significantly to 5.1 t/ha against farmer practice.

Treatment
pendimethalin followed by post-emergence application of clodinafope0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.1 t/hae0
Comparator
existing farmers’ practices (2 sprays of clodinafop at 45 and 65 DAS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sequential application of preemergence herbicide pendimethalin followed by post-emergence application of clodinafop provided effective control of P.minor (WCE 76.8%) and significantly higher yield (5.1 t/ha) over the existing farmers’ practices (2 sprays of clodinafop at 45 and 65 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesosulfuron plus iodosulfuron produced higher yield and effective weed control than clodinafop with pendimethalin at site II.

Treatment
mesosulfuron + iodosulfurone0
Outcome
yield with effective weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
clodinafop with pendimethaline0
Setting
second sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the second site, compared to clodinafop with pendimethalin, mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron, fenoxaprop + metribuzin or sulfosulfuron resulted into higher yield with effective weed control efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop plus metribuzin produced higher yield and effective weed control than clodinafop with pendimethalin at site II.

Treatment
fenoxaprop + metribuzine0
Outcome
yield with effective weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
clodinafop with pendimethaline0
Setting
second sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the second site, compared to clodinafop with pendimethalin, mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron, fenoxaprop + metribuzin or sulfosulfuron resulted into higher yield with effective weed control efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron produced higher yield and effective weed control than clodinafop with pendimethalin at site II.

Treatment
sulfosulfurone0
Outcome
yield with effective weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
clodinafop with pendimethaline0
Setting
second sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the second site, compared to clodinafop with pendimethalin, mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron, fenoxaprop + metribuzin or sulfosulfuron resulted into higher yield with effective weed control efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1154 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesosulfuron plus iodosulfuron gave the highest yield, 5.1 t/ha, at site II.

Treatment
mesosulfuron + iodosulfurone0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
5.1 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“Highest yield was recorded with spray of mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron (5.1 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1235 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin yielded 5.06 t/ha, statistically at par with the highest treatment.

Treatment
pendimethaline0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
statistically at pare0
Value
5.06 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“statistically at par with pendimethalin (5.06 t/ha), fenoxaprop+ metribuzin (5.01 t/ha) and sulfosulfuron at 15 DAS (4.98 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1373 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highest yield was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1182 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop plus metribuzin yielded 5.01 t/ha, statistically at par with the highest treatment.

Treatment
fenoxaprop+ metribuzine0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
statistically at pare0
Value
5.01 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“statistically at par with pendimethalin (5.06 t/ha), fenoxaprop+ metribuzin (5.01 t/ha) and sulfosulfuron at 15 DAS (4.98 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1373 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highest yield was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1182 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron at 15 DAS yielded 4.98 t/ha, statistically at par with the highest treatment.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron at 15 DASe0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
statistically at pare0
Value
4.98 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“statistically at par with pendimethalin (5.06 t/ha), fenoxaprop+ metribuzin (5.01 t/ha) and sulfosulfuron at 15 DAS (4.98 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1373 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highest yield was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1182 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

pendimethalin · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

clodinafop · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 57 positive, 3 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

climate site · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.