Paper · 2020 · Journal of Crop Improvement

Stress physiology and metabolism in hybrid rice. II. Impact of organic manures on anthesis and grain growth under drought conditions

Namrata Singh; C.A.K. Singh; Sanjay Singh

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil-water availability is the major yield determinant of rice (Oryza sativa L.). The objective of this investigation was to study the effects of organic manures vs. inorganic fertilizers on phenological, physiological and yield parameters under drought imposed at various reproductive stages of hybrid rice cv. NDRH-2. The vulnerability of various reproductive stages to drought was ranked as: gametogenesis>anthesis>grain-filling>dough formation>post-dough formation>whole grain. Drought-caused spikelet sterility was related more to injury to palea than to lemma, though the grain growth continued even after the death of palea and/or lemma. Organic manures enhanced the survival of flag leaf (55%) and second leaf (40%) against 31% in plants inorganically fertilized; and increased the number of filled grains by reducing spikelet sterility. Drought at 10 days before anthesis up to 5 days after it proved most harmful in the inorganically fertilized soil (IFS, i.e., control) than in the organically fertilized soil (OFS, i.e., green manure, compost). The net assimilation rate (NAR) varied from 925 (green manure) to 900 mg m−2 day−1(compost) against 888 mg m−2 day−1 in the control. The relative growth rate (RGR) was 4.6 for green manure and 4.4 mg g−1 day−1 for compost, which were higher than the RGR for the control (4.1 mg g−1 day−1). Grain yields [15.9 g (green manure) to 15.4 g (compost) hill−1 in OFS] were higher than the IFS grain yield (13.5 g hill−1), with the harvest indices in OFS [34.4% (green manure) to 34% (compost)] being higher than that in IFS (32.2%) at 10 days before heading. Thus, the use of organic manures enhanced drought tolerance, which minimized the reduction in NAR, RGR, and spikelet sterility, thereby stabilized grain yield under drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought vulnerability ranked from gametogenesis through whole grain stage.

Outcome
vulnerability of various reproductive stages to droughte0
Qualifier
gametogenesis>anthesis>grain-filling>dough formation>post-dough formation>whole graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The vulnerability of various reproductive stages to drought was ranked as: gametogenesis>anthesis>grain-filling>dough formation>post-dough formation>whole grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–480 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought induced spikelet sterility was more related to palea injury than lemma injury.

Organ / stage
paleae0
Outcome
spikelet sterilitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought-caused spikelet sterility was related more to injury to palea than to lemma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain growth continued after palea or lemma death.

Outcome
grain growth continuede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain growth continued even after the death of palea and/or lemma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures enhanced flag leaf survival to 55% versus 31% with inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
Organic manurese0
Outcome
survival of flag leafe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
55%e0
Qualifier
31%e0
Comparator
plants inorganically fertilizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic manures enhanced the survival of flag leaf (55%) and second leaf (40%) against 31% in plants inorganically fertilized”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures enhanced second leaf survival to 40% versus 31% with inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
Organic manurese0
Outcome
second leafe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
plants inorganically fertilizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic manures enhanced the survival of flag leaf (55%) and second leaf (40%) against 31% in plants inorganically fertilized”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures increased filled grains by reducing spikelet sterility.

Outcome
number of filled grainse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the number of filled grains by reducing spikelet sterility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought around anthesis was most harmful in inorganically fertilized soil relative to organically fertilized soil.

Treatment
Drought at 10 days before anthesis up to 5 days after ite0
Outcome
most harmfule0
Direction
most harmfule0
Comparator
organically fertilized soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought at 10 days before anthesis up to 5 days after it proved most harmful in the inorganically fertilized soil (IFS, i.e., control) than in the organically fertilized soil (OFS, i.e., green manure, compost)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure produced NAR of 925 mg m−2 day−1 against 888 in control.

Treatment
green manuree0
Outcome
net assimilation ratee0
Value
925e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net assimilation rate (NAR) varied from 925 (green manure) to 900 mg m−2 day−1(compost) against 888 mg m−2 day−1 in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost produced NAR of 900 mg m−2 day−1 against 888 in control.

Treatment
composte0
Outcome
net assimilation ratee0
Value
900 mg m−2 day−1e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net assimilation rate (NAR) varied from 925 (green manure) to 900 mg m−2 day−1(compost) against 888 mg m−2 day−1 in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure RGR was 4.6 versus 4.1 in control.

Treatment
green manuree0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.6e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative growth rate (RGR) was 4.6 for green manure and 4.4 mg g−1 day−1 for compost, which were higher than the RGR for the control (4.1 mg g−1 day−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost RGR was 4.4 mg g−1 day−1 versus 4.1 in control.

Treatment
composte0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.4 mg g−1 day−1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative growth rate (RGR) was 4.6 for green manure and 4.4 mg g−1 day−1 for compost, which were higher than the RGR for the control (4.1 mg g−1 day−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure yielded 15.9 g hill−1 versus 13.5 g hill−1 in control.

Treatment
green manuree0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.9 ge0
Comparator
IFSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields [15.9 g (green manure) to 15.4 g (compost) hill−1 in OFS] were higher than the IFS grain yield (13.5 g hill−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost yielded 15.4 g hill−1 versus 13.5 g hill−1 in control.

Treatment
composte0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.4 ge0
Comparator
IFSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields [15.9 g (green manure) to 15.4 g (compost) hill−1 in OFS] were higher than the IFS grain yield (13.5 g hill−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure harvest index was 34.4% versus 32.2% in control.

Treatment
green manuree0
Outcome
harvest indicese0
Direction
highere0
Value
34.4%e0
Comparator
IFSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest indices in OFS [34.4% (green manure) to 34% (compost)] being higher than that in IFS (32.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost harvest index was 34% versus 32.2% in control.

Treatment
composte0
Outcome
harvest indicese0
Direction
highere0
Value
34%e0
Comparator
IFSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest indices in OFS [34.4% (green manure) to 34% (compost)] being higher than that in IFS (32.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

fertilization · survival · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.