Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of bio-fertilizers with levels of fertilizer on yield attributes and economic of onion bulb

Devendra Vishvkarma; Rajesh Lekhi; Karan Vir Singh; et al.

9
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted at Horticultural Research Farm, College of Agriculture, RVSKVV, Gwalior (M.P.) during Rabi season 2018-19 and 2019-20. The treatments included combination of different bio-fertilizers and RDF. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design (RBD) with 15 treatments replicated thrice. I pooled, application of bio-fertilizer with different dose of fertilizers had significantly enhanced the yield and yield attributes viz., maximum equatorial diameter of bulb (6.95 cm), polar diameter of bulb (6.29 cm), fresh yield per plant (56.86 g), yield per plot (22.74 kg), yield per hectare (276.02 qt) and dry weight of bulb (31.49 g) were recorded under treatment T15 – 100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB at 30, 60, 90 and 120 days after transplanting, respectively. This treatment, gave significantly higher qualitative yield (379.09 q ha-1) and net returns of (Rs. 3,41,198) as well as maximum B: C ratio of 3:1 keeping the soil fertility sustainable for better yield of successive crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fertilizers with 100% RDF (treatment T15) significantly enhanced onion equatorial diameter of bulb, recorded as 6.95 cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSBe1
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
equatorial diameter of bulbe2
Direction
enhancede3
Value
6.95 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment T15 – 100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–743 · show in text ↑
e2

“maximum equatorial diameter of bulb (6.95 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–505 · show in text ↑
e3

“had significantly enhanced the yield and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fertilizers with 100% RDF (treatment T15) significantly enhanced onion polar diameter of bulb, recorded as 6.29 cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSBe1
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
polar diameter of bulbe2
Direction
enhancede3
Value
6.29 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment T15 – 100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–743 · show in text ↑
e2

“polar diameter of bulb (6.29 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–539 · show in text ↑
e3

“had significantly enhanced the yield and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fertilizers with 100% RDF (treatment T15) significantly enhanced onion fresh yield per plant, recorded as 56.86 g.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSBe1
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
fresh yield per plante2
Direction
enhancede3
Value
56.86 ge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment T15 – 100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–743 · show in text ↑
e2

“fresh yield per plant (56.86 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–572 · show in text ↑
e3

“had significantly enhanced the yield and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fertilizers with 100% RDF (treatment T15) significantly enhanced onion yield per plot, recorded as 22.74 kg.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSBe1
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
yield per plote2
Direction
enhancede3
Value
22.74 kge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment T15 – 100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–743 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield per plot (22.74 kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–599 · show in text ↑
e3

“had significantly enhanced the yield and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fertilizers with 100% RDF (treatment T15) significantly enhanced onion yield per hectare, recorded as 276.02 qt.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSBe1
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
yield per hectaree2
Direction
enhancede3
Value
276.02 qte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment T15 – 100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–743 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield per hectare (276.02 qt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–630 · show in text ↑
e3

“had significantly enhanced the yield and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fertilizers with 100% RDF (treatment T15) significantly enhanced onion dry weight of bulb, recorded as 31.49 g.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSBe1
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
dry weight of bulbe2
Direction
enhancede3
Value
31.49 ge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment T15 – 100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–743 · show in text ↑
e2

“dry weight of bulb (31.49 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–663 · show in text ↑
e3

“had significantly enhanced the yield and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T15 (100% RDF with Azospirillum, Azotobacter and PSB) gave significantly higher qualitative yield of 379.09 q ha-1 in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSBe1
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
qualitative yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
379.09 q ha-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment T15 – 100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–743 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher qualitative yield (379.09 q ha-1) and net returns of (Rs. 3,41,198)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T15 gave significantly higher net returns of Rs. 3,41,198 in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSBe1
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
net returnse2
Direction
highere2
Value
Rs. 3,41,198e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment T15 – 100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–743 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher qualitative yield (379.09 q ha-1) and net returns of (Rs. 3,41,198)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T15 gave the maximum B:C ratio of 3:1 in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSBe1
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
B: C ratioe2
Direction
maximume2
Value
3:1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment T15 – 100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–743 · show in text ↑
e2

“maximum B: C ratio of 3:1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–952 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Azospirillum · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Azospirillum · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

294 papers: 251 positive, 43 negative or no effect

250 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

290 papers more in this group

See all 294 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.