Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bio-fertilizers with 100% RDF (treatment T15) significantly enhanced onion yield per plot, recorded as 22.74 kg.

A claim from Effect of bio-fertilizers with levels of fertilizer on yield attributes and economic of onion bulb · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fertilizers with 100% RDF (treatment T15) significantly enhanced onion yield per plot, recorded as 22.74 kg.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSBe1
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume1symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
yield per plote2
Direction
enhancede3
Value
22.74 kge2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98
e1

“treatment T15 – 100% RDF + Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–743
e2

“yield per plot (22.74 kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–599
e3

“had significantly enhanced the yield and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–453

Title

Effect of bio-fertilizers with levels of fertilizer on yield attributes and economic of onion bulb

Devendra Vishvkarma; Rajesh Lekhi; Karan Vir Singh; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2020

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e6a1d8b0c9d76ed56e376cec2190b5e36e35097cf92b7171d9eab22f10bc9ab1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Azospirillum · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this claim · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

521 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.