Abstract
This pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of the inoculation by the mycorrhizal species (Funneliformis mosseae and Rhizophagus intraradices) in salt-tolerant and -sensitive wheat cultivars (Roshan and Bahar) under three salinity levels (0, 75, and 150 mM NaCl). Salinity significantly decreased shoot and root biomass of both cultivars but to a smaller extent in Roshan. The reductions in biomass were accompanied by decreases in N, P, and K and increases in proline and Malondialdehyde (MDA) and antioxidant enzyme activity. The salt-tolerant cultivar showed less decreases in nutrient content and higher increases in proline and antioxidant enzyme activities. Peroxidase as compared to catalase and ascorbate peroxidase showed a higher contribution in salt tolerance induction. Mycorrhizal inoculation improved plant growth by increasing nutrient content, antioxidant enzyme activity, and decreasing lipid peroxidation. The positive effects of inoculation were in most cases greater on the plants inoculated by F. mosseae. The superiority of this species was associated with lower increases in MDA and H2O2 accompanied by greater increases in the root area and volume, shoot N, P, and K/Na and antioxidant enzyme activities. Higher benefits from mycorrhizal inoculation were taken as the level of salinity was increased. The salt-tolerant cultivar was more positively responsive to mycorrhizal inoculation under non-saline treatment, but the sensitive cultivar was more affected by inoculation under saline conditions. The results from this experiment showed that mycorrhizal inoculation could promote the growth and salt tolerance of wheat cultivars by improving osmoregulation, antioxidant enzyme activity, and reducing lipid peroxidation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly decreased wheat shoot and root biomass, less in Roshan.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Roshane0
- Treatment
- Salinitye0
- Outcome
- shoot and root biomasse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Salinity significantly decreased shoot and root biomass of both cultivars but to a smaller extent in Roshan.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Biomass reductions accompanied lower N, P and K.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- N, P, and Ke0
- Direction
- decreasese0
- Comparator
- reductions in biomasse0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The reductions in biomass were accompanied by decreases in N, P, and K”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Biomass reductions accompanied higher proline, MDA and antioxidant enzyme activity.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- proline and Malondialdehyde (MDA) and antioxidant enzyme activitye0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Comparator
- reductions in biomasse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The reductions in biomass were accompanied by decreases in N, P, and K and increases in proline and Malondialdehyde (MDA) and antioxidant enzyme activity.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The salt-tolerant cultivar showed smaller nutrient losses.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- salt-tolerant cultivare0
- Outcome
- nutrient contente0
- Direction
- less decreasese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The salt-tolerant cultivar showed less decreases in nutrient content and higher increases in proline and antioxidant enzyme activities.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The salt-tolerant cultivar showed greater proline and antioxidant enzyme increases.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- salt-tolerant cultivare0
- Outcome
- proline and antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
- Direction
- higher increasese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The salt-tolerant cultivar showed less decreases in nutrient content and higher increases in proline and antioxidant enzyme activities.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Peroxidase contributed more to salt tolerance induction than catalase and ascorbate peroxidase.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Gene
- Peroxidasee0
- Outcome
- contribution in salt tolerance inductione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- catalase and ascorbate peroxidasee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Peroxidase as compared to catalase and ascorbate peroxidase showed a higher contribution in salt tolerance induction.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation improved plant growth.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Mycorrhizal inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Mycorrhizale0symbiont
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mycorrhizal inoculation improved plant growth by increasing nutrient content, antioxidant enzyme activity, and decreasing lipid peroxidation.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation increased nutrient content and antioxidant enzyme activity.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Mycorrhizal inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Mycorrhizale0symbiont
- Outcome
- nutrient content, antioxidant enzyme activitye0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mycorrhizal inoculation improved plant growth by increasing nutrient content, antioxidant enzyme activity, and decreasing lipid peroxidation.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation decreased lipid peroxidation.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Mycorrhizal inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Mycorrhizale0symbiont
- Outcome
- lipid peroxidatione0
- Direction
- decreasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mycorrhizal inoculation improved plant growth by increasing nutrient content, antioxidant enzyme activity, and decreasing lipid peroxidation.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
F. mosseae gave greater positive inoculation effects in most cases.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- inoculated by F. mosseaee0
- Interactor
- F. mosseae
Funneliformis mosseaee0symbiont - Outcome
- positive effects of inoculatione0
- Direction
- greatere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The positive effects of inoculation were in most cases greater on the plants inoculated by F. mosseae.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
F. mosseae superiority was associated with smaller MDA and H2O2 increases.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- MDA and H2O2e0
- Direction
- lower increasese0
Not reportedInteractor
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The superiority of this species was associated with lower increases in MDA and H2O2 accompanied by greater increases in the root area and volume, shoot N, P, and K/Na and antioxidant enzyme activities.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
F. mosseae superiority accompanied larger increases in root area and volume, shoot nutrients and antioxidant enzyme activities.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- roote0
- Outcome
- root area and volume, shoot N, P, and K/Na and antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
- Direction
- greater increasese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The superiority of this species was associated with lower increases in MDA and H2O2 accompanied by greater increases in the root area and volume, shoot N, P, and K/Na and antioxidant enzyme activities.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal benefits increased with salinity level.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- salinitye0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizale0symbiont
- Outcome
- benefits from mycorrhizal inoculatione0
- Direction
- Highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher benefits from mycorrhizal inoculation were taken as the level of salinity was increased.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Salt-tolerant wheat was more responsive to mycorrhizal inoculation without salinity.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- salt-tolerant cultivare0
- Treatment
- non-saline treatmente0
- Outcome
- responsive to mycorrhizal inoculatione0
- Direction
- more positivelye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The salt-tolerant cultivar was more positively responsive to mycorrhizal inoculation under non-saline treatment, but the sensitive cultivar was more affected by inoculation under saline conditions.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Salt-sensitive wheat was more affected by inoculation under saline conditions.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- sensitive cultivare0
- Treatment
- saline conditionse0
- Outcome
- affected by inoculatione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The salt-tolerant cultivar was more positively responsive to mycorrhizal inoculation under non-saline treatment, but the sensitive cultivar was more affected by inoculation under saline conditions.”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →inoculation · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
78 papers more in this group
See all 82 papers →salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
327 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
373 papers more in this group
See all 377 papers →inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
528 papers more in this group
See all 532 papers →mycorrhiza · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →mycorrhiza · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.