Abstract
In this regard, a field study was conducted during 2016–17 at Khuzestan University of Agriculture and Natural Resources in collaboration with Sugarcane Agro-industry of Dehkhoda, Ahvaz, Southwest Iran to investigate the effect of Enterobacter cloacae and Pseudomonas putida growth-promoting rhizobacteria under different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus on quantitative and qualitative yield of sugarcane. The experiment was laid out under split-block design with bacterial factor at four levels (control, Enterobacter cloaca, Pseudomonas putida and a combination of two types of bacteria), nitrogen factor at three levels (50, 75 and 100% recommended nitrogen for sugarcane) and phosphorus factor at three levels (50, 75 and 100% recommended phosphorus for sugarcane) on CP73–21 as sugarcane test variety. Results revealed that the treatment of simultaneous application of growth-promoting bacteria with the application of 75% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, compared with the control treatment(application of 100% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, without the use of bacteria), in the case of quantitative traits including stalk yield, height, diameter, stalk density, percentage of nitrogen and phosphorus of sugarcane leaves were 96.9%, 98.1%, 95.7%, 96.3%, 100.2% and 101.9% success, respectively and also, in comparison with the control treatment, the mentioned treatment achieved success in the case of qualitative traits including, brix %, CCS% and sugar yield of sugarcane, 95.29, 99.24 and 98%, respectively. Also, regarding the characteristics of sugarcane yield and sugar yield, the simultaneous application treatment of the tested bacteria along with the application of 100% recommended phosphorus and nitrogen for sugarcane was 110.15 and 116% successful compared to the control treatment, respectively, and sugarcane yield and sugar yield Per unit area increased by 10.15 and 16%, respectively. Therefore, the strategy of combined use of growth-promoting bacteria in sugarcane, along with 75% nitrogen and phosphorus recommended for it, both maintained the yield of sugarcane and sugar at an optimal level and saved 25% in nitrogen and phosphorus consumption, and this issue reduced the cost of sugarcane production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Growth-promoting bacteria with 75% recommended N and P gave 96.9% of control stalk yield.
Verbatim
e1“the treatment of simultaneous application of growth-promoting bacteria with the application of 75% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, compared with the control treatment(application of 100% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, without the use of bacteria)”
e2“in the case of quantitative traits including stalk yield, height, diameter, stalk density, percentage of nitrogen and phosphorus of sugarcane leaves were 96.9%, 98.1%, 95.7%, 96.3%, 100.2% and 101.9% success”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth-promoting bacteria with 75% recommended N and P gave 98.1% of control stalk height.
Verbatim
e1“the treatment of simultaneous application of growth-promoting bacteria with the application of 75% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, compared with the control treatment(application of 100% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, without the use of bacteria)”
e2“in the case of quantitative traits including stalk yield, height, diameter, stalk density, percentage of nitrogen and phosphorus of sugarcane leaves were 96.9%, 98.1%, 95.7%, 96.3%, 100.2% and 101.9% success”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth-promoting bacteria with 75% recommended N and P gave 95.7% of control stalk diameter.
Verbatim
e1“the treatment of simultaneous application of growth-promoting bacteria with the application of 75% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, compared with the control treatment(application of 100% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, without the use of bacteria)”
e2“in the case of quantitative traits including stalk yield, height, diameter, stalk density, percentage of nitrogen and phosphorus of sugarcane leaves were 96.9%, 98.1%, 95.7%, 96.3%, 100.2% and 101.9% success”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth-promoting bacteria with 75% recommended N and P gave 96.3% of control stalk density.
Verbatim
e1“the treatment of simultaneous application of growth-promoting bacteria with the application of 75% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, compared with the control treatment(application of 100% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, without the use of bacteria)”
e2“in the case of quantitative traits including stalk yield, height, diameter, stalk density, percentage of nitrogen and phosphorus of sugarcane leaves were 96.9%, 98.1%, 95.7%, 96.3%, 100.2% and 101.9% success”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth-promoting bacteria with 75% recommended N and P gave 100.2% of control leaf nitrogen percentage.
Verbatim
e1“the treatment of simultaneous application of growth-promoting bacteria with the application of 75% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, compared with the control treatment(application of 100% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, without the use of bacteria)”
e2“in the case of quantitative traits including stalk yield, height, diameter, stalk density, percentage of nitrogen and phosphorus of sugarcane leaves were 96.9%, 98.1%, 95.7%, 96.3%, 100.2% and 101.9% success”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth-promoting bacteria with 75% recommended N and P gave 101.9% of control leaf phosphorus percentage.
Verbatim
e1“the treatment of simultaneous application of growth-promoting bacteria with the application of 75% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, compared with the control treatment(application of 100% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, without the use of bacteria)”
e2“in the case of quantitative traits including stalk yield, height, diameter, stalk density, percentage of nitrogen and phosphorus of sugarcane leaves were 96.9%, 98.1%, 95.7%, 96.3%, 100.2% and 101.9% success”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth-promoting bacteria with 75% recommended N and P gave 95.29% of control Brix.
Verbatim
e1“the treatment of simultaneous application of growth-promoting bacteria with the application of 75% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, compared with the control treatment(application of 100% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, without the use of bacteria)”
e3“in comparison with the control treatment, the mentioned treatment achieved success in the case of qualitative traits including, brix %, CCS% and sugar yield of sugarcane, 95.29, 99.24 and 98%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth-promoting bacteria with 75% recommended N and P gave 99.24% of control CCS.
Verbatim
e1“the treatment of simultaneous application of growth-promoting bacteria with the application of 75% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, compared with the control treatment(application of 100% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, without the use of bacteria)”
e3“in comparison with the control treatment, the mentioned treatment achieved success in the case of qualitative traits including, brix %, CCS% and sugar yield of sugarcane, 95.29, 99.24 and 98%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth-promoting bacteria with 75% recommended N and P gave 98% of control sugar yield.
Verbatim
e1“the treatment of simultaneous application of growth-promoting bacteria with the application of 75% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, compared with the control treatment(application of 100% recommended nitrogen and phosphorus for sugarcane, without the use of bacteria)”
e3“in comparison with the control treatment, the mentioned treatment achieved success in the case of qualitative traits including, brix %, CCS% and sugar yield of sugarcane, 95.29, 99.24 and 98%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Simultaneous application of bacteria with 100% recommended N and P increased sugarcane yield by 10.15% over control.
Verbatim
e4“the simultaneous application treatment of the tested bacteria along with the application of 100% recommended phosphorus and nitrogen for sugarcane was 110.15 and 116% successful compared to the control treatment”
e5“sugarcane yield and sugar yield Per unit area increased by 10.15 and 16%”
Claim · model-written summary
Simultaneous application of bacteria with 100% recommended N and P increased sugar yield by 16% over control.
Verbatim
e4“the simultaneous application treatment of the tested bacteria along with the application of 100% recommended phosphorus and nitrogen for sugarcane was 110.15 and 116% successful compared to the control treatment”
e5“sugarcane yield and sugar yield Per unit area increased by 10.15 and 16%”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined bacteria with 75% N and P saved 25% of nitrogen and phosphorus consumption in sugarcane.
Verbatim
e6“both maintained the yield of sugarcane and sugar at an optimal level and saved 25% in nitrogen and phosphorus consumption, and this issue reduced the cost of sugarcane production”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined use of growth-promoting bacteria reduced the cost of sugarcane production.
Verbatim
e6“both maintained the yield of sugarcane and sugar at an optimal level and saved 25% in nitrogen and phosphorus consumption, and this issue reduced the cost of sugarcane production”
e7“the strategy of combined use of growth-promoting bacteria in sugarcane, along with 75% nitrogen and phosphorus recommended for it, both maintained the yield of sugarcane and sugar at an optimal level”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined use of growth-promoting bacteria maintained sugarcane yield and sugar yield at an optimal level.
Verbatim
e7“the strategy of combined use of growth-promoting bacteria in sugarcane, along with 75% nitrogen and phosphorus recommended for it, both maintained the yield of sugarcane and sugar at an optimal level”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined use of growth-promoting bacteria in sugarcane with 75% N and P is recommended.
Verbatim
e7“the strategy of combined use of growth-promoting bacteria in sugarcane, along with 75% nitrogen and phosphorus recommended for it, both maintained the yield of sugarcane and sugar at an optimal level”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
133 papers more in this group
See all 137 papers →phosphorus · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →phosphorus · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →inoculation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →phosphorus · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
53 papers more in this group
See all 57 papers →inoculation · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
56 papers more in this group
See all 60 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.