Abstract
Field experiment was conducted at research farm, Department of Agricultural Meteorology, CCS HAU, Hisar located at 29° 10¢ N latitude, 75° 46¢ E longitude and 215.2 m altitude during rabi season (2007-08 and 2008-09) to study the variation in heat and radiation use efficiency of wheat as influenced by thermal stress management strategies under late sown conditions. The grain, straw and biological yields in pre-sowing treatment were maximum when overnight soaked seed sowing with 25% higher seed rate in dry bed followed by irrigation. Under post anthesis treatments, the highest grain and biological yields were observed in treatment of Urea (2.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) spray at anthesis. The highest radiation use efficiency (RUE) was recorded in pre-sowing treatment when overnight soaked seed sowing with 25% higher seed rate in dry bed followed by irrigation at milking. Under post anthesis strategies, the maximum RUE was observed in treatment of Urea (2.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) spray at anthesis.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Overnight soaked seed with a 25% higher seed rate and irrigation maximized grain, straw and biological yields.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- overnight soaked seed sowing with 25% higher seed rate in dry bed followed by irrigatione0
- Outcome
- grain, straw and biological yieldse0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain, straw and biological yields in pre-sowing treatment were maximum when overnight soaked seed sowing with 25% higher seed rate in dry bed followed by irrigation”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea and ZnSO4 spray at anthesis produced the highest grain and biological yields among post anthesis treatments.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Urea (2.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) spray at anthesise0
- Outcome
- grain and biological yieldse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest grain and biological yields were observed in treatment of Urea (2.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) spray at anthesis”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Soaked seed, higher seed rate and irrigation at milking maximized radiation use efficiency.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- overnight soaked seed sowing with 25% higher seed rate in dry bed followed by irrigation at milkinge0
- Outcome
- radiation use efficiency (RUE)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest radiation use efficiency (RUE) was recorded in pre-sowing treatment when overnight soaked seed sowing with 25% higher seed rate in dry bed followed by irrigation at milking”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea and ZnSO4 spray at anthesis maximized radiation use efficiency among post anthesis strategies.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Urea (2.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) spray at anthesise0
- Outcome
- RUEe0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum RUE was observed in treatment of Urea (2.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) spray at anthesis”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
96 papers more in this group
See all 100 papers →density · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
106 papers more in this group
See all 110 papers →irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
238 papers more in this group
See all 242 papers →application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
303 papers more in this group
See all 307 papers →density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
494 papers more in this group
See all 498 papers →nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
547 papers more in this group
See all 551 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.