Abstract
The present work was carried out during 2020 and 2021 successive growing seasons at Sadat City farms, Cairo, Alexandria Desert Road, Menoufia Governorate, Egypt, to study the Effect of Compost on Root Rot Disease Management to Increase Tomato Plants Productivity. Whereas, chemical pesticides might have injury on the environment and human health because it highly toxic substances produced in agricultural led to, great disturbance in biological balance. Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii were isolated from rotted samples of tomato plants as the main causal pathogens of root rot and damping off diseases. In addition, causing losses on the yield. Adding the different organic matters, i.e. plant residue, cow manure and compost “plant residue + cow manure” to the soil before transplanting tomato at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2 significantly reduced disease incidence and also, increased the percentage of the survived plants compared to control treatment during 2020 and 2021 growing seasons. Compost, as tomato rich organic fertilizer at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2 caused the highest decrease in disease incidence and recorded also, the highest increase in vegetative growth (plant height, no. of brunches/plant and No. of leaves/brunch); yield parameters; flavonoid and total phenol during the two growing seasons. No clear significant differences were noticed between both plant residues and cow manure in respect to plant growth characteristics.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizoctonia solani was isolated from rotted tomato and identified as a main root-rot and damping-off pathogen.
- Taxon
- tomato plants
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Interactor
- Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solanie0pathogen - Outcome
- root rot and damping off diseasese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii were isolated from rotted samples of tomato plants as the main causal pathogens of root rot and damping off diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
Sclerotium rolfsii was isolated from rotted tomato and identified as a main root-rot and damping-off pathogen.
- Taxon
- tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume0
- Interactor
- Sclerotium rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen - Outcome
- root rot and damping off diseasese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii were isolated from rotted samples of tomato plants as the main causal pathogens of root rot and damping off diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant residue significantly reduced tomato disease incidence versus control.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- plant residuee0
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
- Setting
- 2020 and 2021 growing seasonse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Adding the different organic matters, i.e. plant residue, cow manure and compost “plant residue + cow manure” to the soil before transplanting tomato at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2 significantly reduced disease incidence and also, increased the percentage of the survived plants compared to control treatment during 2020 and 2021 growing seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow manure significantly reduced tomato disease incidence versus control.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- cow manuree0
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Adding the different organic matters, i.e. plant residue, cow manure and compost “plant residue + cow manure” to the soil before transplanting tomato at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2 significantly reduced disease incidence and also, increased the percentage of the survived plants compared to control treatment during 2020 and 2021 growing seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost significantly reduced tomato disease incidence versus control.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- compost “plant residue + cow manure”e0
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Adding the different organic matters, i.e. plant residue, cow manure and compost “plant residue + cow manure” to the soil before transplanting tomato at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2 significantly reduced disease incidence and also, increased the percentage of the survived plants compared to control treatment during 2020 and 2021 growing seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant residue increased tomato survival versus control.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- plant residuee0
- Outcome
- percentage of the survived plantse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Adding the different organic matters, i.e. plant residue, cow manure and compost “plant residue + cow manure” to the soil before transplanting tomato at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2 significantly reduced disease incidence and also, increased the percentage of the survived plants compared to control treatment during 2020 and 2021 growing seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow manure increased tomato survival versus control.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- cow manuree0
- Outcome
- percentage of the survived plantse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Adding the different organic matters, i.e. plant residue, cow manure and compost “plant residue + cow manure” to the soil before transplanting tomato at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2 significantly reduced disease incidence and also, increased the percentage of the survived plants compared to control treatment during 2020 and 2021 growing seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost increased tomato survival versus control.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- compost “plant residue + cow manure”e0
- Outcome
- percentage of the survived plantse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Adding the different organic matters, i.e. plant residue, cow manure and compost “plant residue + cow manure” to the soil before transplanting tomato at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2 significantly reduced disease incidence and also, increased the percentage of the survived plants compared to control treatment during 2020 and 2021 growing seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost caused the greatest reduction in tomato disease incidence.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Compost, as tomato rich organic fertilizer at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2e0
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- highest decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compost, as tomato rich organic fertilizer at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2 caused the highest decrease in disease incidence and recorded also, the highest increase in vegetative growth (plant height, no. of brunches/plant and No. of leaves/brunch); yield parameters; flavonoid and total phenol during the two growing seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost produced the greatest increase in tomato vegetative growth traits.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Compost, as tomato rich organic fertilizer at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2e0
- Outcome
- vegetative growth (plant height, no. of brunches/plant and No. of leaves/brunch)e0
- Direction
- highest increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compost, as tomato rich organic fertilizer at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2 caused the highest decrease in disease incidence and recorded also, the highest increase in vegetative growth (plant height, no. of brunches/plant and No. of leaves/brunch); yield parameters; flavonoid and total phenol during the two growing seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost produced the greatest increase in tomato yield parameters.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Compost, as tomato rich organic fertilizer at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2e0
- Outcome
- yield parameterse0
- Direction
- highest increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compost, as tomato rich organic fertilizer at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2 caused the highest decrease in disease incidence and recorded also, the highest increase in vegetative growth (plant height, no. of brunches/plant and No. of leaves/brunch); yield parameters; flavonoid and total phenol during the two growing seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost produced the greatest increase in tomato flavonoid and total phenol.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Compost, as tomato rich organic fertilizer at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2e0
- Outcome
- flavonoid and total phenole0
- Direction
- highest increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compost, as tomato rich organic fertilizer at the rate of 1.2 Kg/m2 caused the highest decrease in disease incidence and recorded also, the highest increase in vegetative growth (plant height, no. of brunches/plant and No. of leaves/brunch); yield parameters; flavonoid and total phenol during the two growing seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato growth characteristics did not differ significantly between plant residue and cow manure.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- plant residuese0
- Outcome
- plant growth characteristicse0
- Direction
- No clear significant differencese0
- Comparator
- cow manuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No clear significant differences were noticed between both plant residues and cow manure in respect to plant growth characteristics”
t0“Tomato”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · survival · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fertilization · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
107 papers more in this group
See all 111 papers →fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
167 papers more in this group
See all 171 papers →fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
664 papers more in this group
See all 668 papers →fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
974 papers more in this group
See all 978 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.