Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Horticulture

Efficacy of the cyclolipopeptides fengycin and iturin A against postharvest pome fruit pathogens

Sinovuyo Magwebu; Julia C. Meitz-Hopkins; Robert W. M. Pott; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Botrytis cinerea (gray mold) and Penicillium expansum (blue mold), are major pome fruit postharvest pathogens and their control relies heavily on the use of one postharvest fungicide (fludioxonil). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the cyclolipopeptides (CLPs), in the form of fengycin and iturin A, in crude metabolite extracts from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as an alternative biofungicide. The crude extract containing CLPs was applied with an edible coating (i.e., zein as a carrier) as a postharvest treatment against B. cinerea on “Packham’s Triumph” pears and P. expansum on “Cripps Pink” apples. Treatments were applied either as dips in combination with a zein edible coating at pH 2.0 or pH 8.0, or as sprays with a zein edible coating at pH 2.0 or pH 8.0. The efficacy of CLP applications was measured in comparison to the standard registered synthetic fungicide fludioxonil at a concentration of 299.0 mg/L. Treatments were applied to the fruit either preventatively (as sprays) or curatively (as dips or sprays). The lowest mean blue mold incidence (68.6%) was achieved when the edible coating containing the crude extract of B. amyloliquefaciens (CLP at pH 2.0) was applied as a curative dip treatment. B. cinerea infection was reduced by 92.6%, resulting in a 5.7% gray mold incidence for the curative application of CLPs at pH 2.0. This result was not significantly different from the inhibitory action of the fungicide fludioxonil. These results indicate that CLPs are an effective alternative biofungicide that can be used for the control of B. cinerea on pome fruit, especially if their formulation and application are improved and optimized.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Curative dip treatment gave the lowest blue mold incidence, 68.6%, in apples.

Material
“Cripps Pink”e1
Treatment
edible coating containing the crude extract of B. amyloliquefaciens (CLP at pH 2.0)e0
Interactor
P. expansumPenicillium expansume1pathogen
Outcome
blue mold incidencee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
68.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium expansum
Penicillium expansum · InteractorH.J. Larsen, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest mean blue mold incidence (68.6%) was achieved when the edible coating containing the crude extract of B. amyloliquefaciens (CLP at pH 2.0) was applied as a curative dip treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1226 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. expansum on “Cripps Pink” apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Curative CLP at pH 2.0 reduced B. cinerea infection by 92.6% in pears.

Taxon
pearsPyruse1
Material
“Packham’s Triumph”e1
Treatment
curative application of CLPs at pH 2.0e0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
B. cinerea infectione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
92.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. cinerea infection was reduced by 92.6%, resulting in a 5.7% gray mold incidence for the curative application of CLPs at pH 2.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. cinerea on “Packham’s Triumph” pears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–573 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The curative treatment produced 5.7% gray mold incidence in pears.

Taxon
pearsPyruse1
Treatment
curative application of CLPs at pH 2.0e0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
gray mold incidencee0
Value
5.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in a 5.7% gray mold incidence for the curative application of CLPs at pH 2.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. cinerea on “Packham’s Triumph” pears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment did not differ significantly from fludioxonil inhibition.

Taxon
pearsPyruse1
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
inhibitory actione0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
fludioxonile0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This result was not significantly different from the inhibitory action of the fungicide fludioxonil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1458 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. cinerea on “Packham’s Triumph” pears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–573 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose CLPs as an alternative biofungicide for B. cinerea on pome fruit, subject to formulation improvements.

Taxon
pome fruite0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
control of B. cinerea on pome fruite0
Qualifier
if their formulation and application are improved and optimizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CLPs are an effective alternative biofungicide that can be used for the control of B. cinerea on pome fruit, especially if their formulation and application are improved and optimized”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1671 · show in text ↑

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · Penicillium expansum · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

storage · Penicillium expansum · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

botanical · Penicillium expansum · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.