Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

On farm response of nutrient management practices on soil, yield and economics of rice- chickpea cropping system in Chhattisgarh

Anil Kumar Netam; SS Porte; Chainu Ram Netam

19
claims
27
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

On –farm experiments were conducted during Kharif and Rabi seasons of 2017-18 at 24 farmers fields at 6 villages viz. Aaturgaon, Bevarti and Mohpur of Block- Kanker and Hatkondal, Gotulmunda and Damkasa villages of Block- Durgukondal, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker, situated in Chhattisgarh Plain Zone (CG-1) and Bastar Plateau Zone (CG-2) of Chhattisgarh. Experiment conducted at 4 farmer’s field in each village. The soils of experimental site were sandy loam to loam; with low in available nitrogen (217.79 kg ha-1) and medium in available phosphorus (11.3 kg ha-1), available potassium (303.21 kg ha-1) and organic carbon (0.51%) and acidic in reaction (6.2 pH).The rice- chickpea cropping system experiment was conducted with seven treatments viz. control (T1), N (T2), NP (T3), NK (T4), NPK (T5), NPK+ micro nutrient (T6) and Farmers practice (T7). For Zn micro nutrient ZnSO4 applied in rice and Single Super Phosphate applied for both P and S in chickpea under T6 treatment. The recommended dose of nutrients were: 100:60:40:20 kg/ha N: P: K: ZnSO4 for rice and 20:40:20:20 kg/ha N: P: K: S for chickpea. Whereas, in farmer’s practices 60:40:30 kg/ha N: P: K and 10:20:10 kg/ha N: P: K: were applied in rice and chickpea crops respectively. IGKV R-1 variety of rice and JAKI-9218 variety of chickpea grown with recommended package of practices under irrigated condition. The application of recommended dose of NPK + micro nutrient recorded significantly higher grain yield of rice (54.47 q ha-1), chick pea (14.27 q ha-1) and RGEY (93.95 q ha-1). Farmers practice treatment recorded highest nutrient response 16.09 kg grain/ kg nutrient and application of recommended dose of N in rice- chickpea cropping system recorded highest nutrient response Rs/Re (8.62). Application of recommended dose of NPK+ micronutrient recorded significantly higher nutrient uptake N (152.58 kg ha-1), P (34.11 kg ha-1) and K (172.57 kg ha-1) by rice- chickpea cropping system. Application of recommended dose of NPK+ micronutrient recorded significantly higher organic carbon (0.68%), available nitrogen (263.57 kg ha-1), phosphorus (18.13 kg ha-1) and potassium (366.36 kg ha-1) at end of the cropping system. Highest positive balance of available nitrogen (98.36 kg ha-1) and potassium (195.72 kg ha-1) recorded in application of recommended dose of NPK + micronutrient and application of recommended dose of NK resulted higher positive balance of phosphorus ((21.5 kg ha-1). Highest gross return (86602 Rs ha-1) and net return (56028 Rs ha-1) of rice, gross return (62764 Rs ha-1) and net return (42430 Rs ha-) of chickpea and gross return (149366 Rs ha-1), net return (98458 Rs ha-) and B: C ratio (2.93) of rice- chickpea cropping system recorded under application of recommended dose of NPK + micronutrient.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK + micronutrient significantly increased rice grain yield to 54.47 q ha-1.

Treatment
recommended dose of NPK + micro nutriente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
54.47 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of recommended dose of NPK + micro nutrient recorded significantly higher grain yield of rice (54.47 q ha-1), chick pea (14.27 q ha-1) and RGEY (93.95 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK + micronutrient significantly increased chickpea grain yield to 14.27 q ha-1.

Taxon
chick peaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
recommended dose of NPK + micro nutriente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.27 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of recommended dose of NPK + micro nutrient recorded significantly higher grain yield of rice (54.47 q ha-1), chick pea (14.27 q ha-1) and RGEY (93.95 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK + micronutrient significantly increased rice-equivalent grain yield (RGEY) to 93.95 q ha-1.

Treatment
recommended dose of NPK + micro nutriente0
Outcome
RGEYe0
Direction
highere0
Value
93.95 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of recommended dose of NPK + micro nutrient recorded significantly higher grain yield of rice (54.47 q ha-1), chick pea (14.27 q ha-1) and RGEY (93.95 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers practice gave the highest nutrient response of 16.09 kg grain per kg nutrient.

Treatment
Farmers practicee1
Outcome
nutrient responsee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
16.09 kg grain/ kg nutriente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of recommended dose of NPK + micro nutrient recorded significantly higher grain yield of rice (54.47 q ha-1), chick pea (14.27 q ha-1) and RGEY (93.95 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1553 · show in text ↑
e1

“Farmers practice treatment recorded highest nutrient response 16.09 kg grain/ kg nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended dose of N in rice-chickpea system gave the highest nutrient response, Rs/Re 8.62.

Treatment
recommended dose of Ne2
Outcome
nutrient responsee2
Direction
higheste2
Value
8.62e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“application of recommended dose of N in rice- chickpea cropping system recorded highest nutrient response Rs/Re (8.62)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK+ micronutrient significantly increased nutrient uptake of N to 152.58 kg ha-1 in the rice-chickpea system.

Treatment
recommended dose of NPK+ micronutriente3
Outcome
nutrient uptakee3
Direction
highere3
Value
152.58 kg ha-1e3
Qualifier
Ne3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Application of recommended dose of NPK+ micronutrient recorded significantly higher nutrient uptake N (152.58 kg ha-1), P (34.11 kg ha-1) and K (172.57 kg ha-1) by rice- chickpea cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK+ micronutrient significantly increased nutrient uptake of P to 34.11 kg ha-1 in the rice-chickpea system.

Treatment
recommended dose of NPK+ micronutriente3
Outcome
nutrient uptakee3
Direction
highere3
Value
34.11 kg ha-1e3
Qualifier
Pe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Application of recommended dose of NPK+ micronutrient recorded significantly higher nutrient uptake N (152.58 kg ha-1), P (34.11 kg ha-1) and K (172.57 kg ha-1) by rice- chickpea cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK+ micronutrient significantly increased nutrient uptake of K to 172.57 kg ha-1 in the rice-chickpea system.

Treatment
recommended dose of NPK+ micronutriente3
Outcome
nutrient uptakee3
Direction
highere3
Value
172.57 kg ha-1e3
Qualifier
Ke3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Application of recommended dose of NPK+ micronutrient recorded significantly higher nutrient uptake N (152.58 kg ha-1), P (34.11 kg ha-1) and K (172.57 kg ha-1) by rice- chickpea cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK+ micronutrient significantly increased soil organic carbon to 0.68% at the end of the cropping system.

Treatment
recommended dose of NPK+ micronutriente4
Outcome
organic carbone4
Direction
highere4
Value
0.68%e4
Qualifier
at end of the cropping systeme4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of recommended dose of NPK + micro nutrient recorded significantly higher grain yield of rice (54.47 q ha-1), chick pea (14.27 q ha-1) and RGEY (93.95 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1553 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of recommended dose of NPK+ micronutrient recorded significantly higher organic carbon (0.68%), available nitrogen (263.57 kg ha-1), phosphorus (18.13 kg ha-1) and potassium (366.36 kg ha-1) at end of the cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK+ micronutrient significantly increased available nitrogen to 263.57 kg ha-1 at the end of the cropping system.

Treatment
recommended dose of NPK+ micronutriente4
Outcome
available nitrogene4
Direction
highere4
Value
263.57 kg ha-1e4
Qualifier
at end of the cropping systeme4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of recommended dose of NPK + micro nutrient recorded significantly higher grain yield of rice (54.47 q ha-1), chick pea (14.27 q ha-1) and RGEY (93.95 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1553 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of recommended dose of NPK+ micronutrient recorded significantly higher organic carbon (0.68%), available nitrogen (263.57 kg ha-1), phosphorus (18.13 kg ha-1) and potassium (366.36 kg ha-1) at end of the cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK+ micronutrient significantly increased available phosphorus to 18.13 kg ha-1 at the end of the cropping system.

Treatment
recommended dose of NPK+ micronutriente4
Outcome
phosphoruse4
Direction
highere4
Value
18.13 kg ha-1e4
Qualifier
at end of the cropping systeme4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of recommended dose of NPK + micro nutrient recorded significantly higher grain yield of rice (54.47 q ha-1), chick pea (14.27 q ha-1) and RGEY (93.95 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1553 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of recommended dose of NPK+ micronutrient recorded significantly higher organic carbon (0.68%), available nitrogen (263.57 kg ha-1), phosphorus (18.13 kg ha-1) and potassium (366.36 kg ha-1) at end of the cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK+ micronutrient significantly increased available potassium to 366.36 kg ha-1 at the end of the cropping system.

Treatment
recommended dose of NPK+ micronutriente4
Outcome
potassiume4
Direction
highere4
Value
366.36 kg ha-1e4
Qualifier
at end of the cropping systeme4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of recommended dose of NPK + micro nutrient recorded significantly higher grain yield of rice (54.47 q ha-1), chick pea (14.27 q ha-1) and RGEY (93.95 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1553 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of recommended dose of NPK+ micronutrient recorded significantly higher organic carbon (0.68%), available nitrogen (263.57 kg ha-1), phosphorus (18.13 kg ha-1) and potassium (366.36 kg ha-1) at end of the cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK + micronutrient gave the highest positive balance of available nitrogen, 98.36 kg ha-1.

Treatment
recommended dose of NPK + micronutriente5
Outcome
available nitrogene5
Direction
Higheste5
Value
98.36 kg ha-1e5
Qualifier
positive balancee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of recommended dose of NPK + micro nutrient recorded significantly higher grain yield of rice (54.47 q ha-1), chick pea (14.27 q ha-1) and RGEY (93.95 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1553 · show in text ↑
e5

“Highest positive balance of available nitrogen (98.36 kg ha-1) and potassium (195.72 kg ha-1) recorded in application of recommended dose of NPK + micronutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2199–2359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK + micronutrient gave the highest positive balance of potassium, 195.72 kg ha-1.

Treatment
recommended dose of NPK + micronutriente5
Outcome
potassiume5
Direction
Higheste5
Value
195.72 kg ha-1e5
Qualifier
positive balancee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of recommended dose of NPK + micro nutrient recorded significantly higher grain yield of rice (54.47 q ha-1), chick pea (14.27 q ha-1) and RGEY (93.95 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1553 · show in text ↑
e5

“Highest positive balance of available nitrogen (98.36 kg ha-1) and potassium (195.72 kg ha-1) recorded in application of recommended dose of NPK + micronutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2199–2359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NK dose gave a higher positive balance of phosphorus, 21.5 kg ha-1.

Treatment
application of recommended dose of NKe6
Outcome
phosphoruse6
Direction
highere6
Value
21.5 kg ha-1e6
Qualifier
positive balancee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of recommended dose of NPK + micro nutrient recorded significantly higher grain yield of rice (54.47 q ha-1), chick pea (14.27 q ha-1) and RGEY (93.95 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1553 · show in text ↑
e6

“application of recommended dose of NK resulted higher positive balance of phosphorus ((21.5 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2364–2464 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK + micronutrient gave gross return of 86602 Rs ha-1 and net return of 56028 Rs ha-1 for rice.

Treatment
recommended dose of NPK + micronutriente7
Outcome
gross returne7
Value
86602 Rs ha-1e7
Qualifier
net return (56028 Rs ha-1)e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Highest gross return (86602 Rs ha-1) and net return (56028 Rs ha-1) of rice, gross return (62764 Rs ha-1) and net return (42430 Rs ha-) of chickpea and gross return (149366 Rs ha-1), net return (98458 Rs ha-) and B: C ratio (2.93) of rice- chickpea cropping system recorded under application of recommended dose of NPK + micronutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2466–2800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK + micronutrient gave gross return of 62764 Rs ha-1 and net return of 42430 Rs ha-1 for chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume7
Treatment
recommended dose of NPK + micronutriente7
Outcome
gross returne7
Value
62764 Rs ha-1e7
Qualifier
net return (42430 Rs ha-)e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Highest gross return (86602 Rs ha-1) and net return (56028 Rs ha-1) of rice, gross return (62764 Rs ha-1) and net return (42430 Rs ha-) of chickpea and gross return (149366 Rs ha-1), net return (98458 Rs ha-) and B: C ratio (2.93) of rice- chickpea cropping system recorded under application of recommended dose of NPK + micronutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2466–2800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK + micronutrient gave gross return of 149366 Rs ha-1 and net return of 98458 Rs ha-1 for the rice-chickpea system.

Taxon
rice- chickpea cropping systeme7
Treatment
recommended dose of NPK + micronutriente7
Outcome
gross returne7
Value
149366 Rs ha-1e7
Qualifier
net return (98458 Rs ha-)e7

Verbatim

e7

“Highest gross return (86602 Rs ha-1) and net return (56028 Rs ha-1) of rice, gross return (62764 Rs ha-1) and net return (42430 Rs ha-) of chickpea and gross return (149366 Rs ha-1), net return (98458 Rs ha-) and B: C ratio (2.93) of rice- chickpea cropping system recorded under application of recommended dose of NPK + micronutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2466–2800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK + micronutrient gave a benefit-cost ratio of 2.93 for the rice-chickpea system.

Taxon
rice- chickpea cropping systeme7
Treatment
recommended dose of NPK + micronutriente7
Outcome
B: C ratioe7
Value
2.93e7

Verbatim

e7

“Highest gross return (86602 Rs ha-1) and net return (56028 Rs ha-1) of rice, gross return (62764 Rs ha-1) and net return (42430 Rs ha-) of chickpea and gross return (149366 Rs ha-1), net return (98458 Rs ha-) and B: C ratio (2.93) of rice- chickpea cropping system recorded under application of recommended dose of NPK + micronutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2466–2800 · show in text ↑

micronutrient · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

micronutrient · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

279 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.