Paper · 2023 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Effect of Elevated CO2 on the Growth, Physiological Traits and Biological Yield of Three Genotypes of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Kamla Dhyani; Rupinder Kaur; Rupali Kaushik; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Because of economical relevance of wheat being a staple crop, it is important to understand how this crop will respond to the foreseen increase in atmospheric CO2 conc. An experiment was conducted to know about the physiological and growth pattern of three genotypes PBW-373, PBW-343, PBW-502 of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under elevated CO2 condition. Two chambers one with increased CO2 and one with ambient CO2 were employed. Crop was cultivated within the chamber under ambient (400 ppm) and enhanced CO2 (800 ppm) conditions, from seedling to maturity. Compared to ambient CO2 , crop produced more biomass. The impact of EC on plant growth, reproductive structure, productivity and physiological parameters (photosynthetic rate, transpiration, stomatal conductance, morphology, leaf area and biomass) etc. were examined. The outcomes weren’t one way. For one plant growth cycle, all the parameters were recorded. Photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and biomass all experienced significant increases among two genotypes out of three. Overall performance of PBW-343, PBW-373 was determined to be good in view of test weight under high CO2 conditions. Genotypic variation was also documented. Both genotypes are known to be tolerant of high CO2 conditions. Overall, it can be said that EC promotes plant growth and biomass, although further research is needed to determine how EC affects flowering. Increases in shoot length, root length, and the number of tillers in terms of their size and weight were caused by the high CO2 concentration. The economic yield of wheat per plant significantly increases when exposed to high CO2 . In this work, we investigated the impact of current and projected CO2 concentration on wheat crop growth, biomass, and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased wheat biomass relative to ambient CO2.

Treatment
Elevated CO2t0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
ambient CO2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to ambient CO2 , crop produced more biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Elevated CO2 on the Growth, Physiological Traits and Biological Yield of Three Genotypes of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate increased significantly in two of three genotypes.

Treatment
Elevated CO2t0
Outcome
Photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
two genotypes out of threee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and biomass all experienced significant increases among two genotypes out of three”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Elevated CO2 on the Growth, Physiological Traits and Biological Yield of Three Genotypes of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration rate and stomatal conductance increased significantly in two of three genotypes.

Treatment
Elevated CO2t0
Outcome
transpiration rate, stomatal conductancee0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
two genotypes out of threee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and biomass all experienced significant increases among two genotypes out of three”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Elevated CO2 on the Growth, Physiological Traits and Biological Yield of Three Genotypes of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass increased significantly in two of three genotypes.

Treatment
Elevated CO2t0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
two genotypes out of threee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biomass all experienced significant increases among two genotypes out of three”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Elevated CO2 on the Growth, Physiological Traits and Biological Yield of Three Genotypes of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBW-343 and PBW-373 performed well for test weight under high CO2.

Material
PBW-343, PBW-373e0
Outcome
test weighte0
Qualifier
high CO2 conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall performance of PBW-343, PBW-373 was determined to be good in view of test weight under high CO2 conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“Elevated CO2 on the Growth, Physiological Traits and Biological Yield of Three Genotypes of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–107 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors characterized both genotypes as tolerant of high CO2.

Outcome
tolerant of high CO2 conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both genotypes are known to be tolerant of high CO2 conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Elevated CO2 on the Growth, Physiological Traits and Biological Yield of Three Genotypes of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 increased shoot length, root length and tiller size and weight.

Treatment
high CO2 concentratione0
Outcome
shoot length, root length, and the number of tillers in terms of their size and weighte0
Direction
Increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in shoot length, root length, and the number of tillers in terms of their size and weight were caused by the high CO2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1571 · show in text ↑
t0

“Elevated CO2 on the Growth, Physiological Traits and Biological Yield of Three Genotypes of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic yield per wheat plant increased significantly under high CO2.

Treatment
high CO2e0
Outcome
economic yield of wheat per plante0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The economic yield of wheat per plant significantly increases when exposed to high CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1659 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 69 positive, 28 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

co2 · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 124 positive, 21 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

co2 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

203 papers: 174 positive, 29 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

199 papers more in this group

See all 203 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.