Paper · 2024 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Management of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. using environmentally friendly method-an alternative to fungicides

N.S. Punya; N. Kiran Kumar; K.S. Ashwini; et al.

13
claims
34
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Paddy is the second crop where huge amounts of chemicals are used for production, majorly for disease control. To avoid excess use of chemicals in the rice fields and also to find the best alternative solution to fungicides for sheath blight disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani, research was carried out by using various bioagents, plant extracts and synthetic bio-polymers. Prior to the field experiments, in vitro studies were carried out to check the efficacy of various bio agents and plant extracts by using dual culture and poisoned food techniques, respectively. Trichoderma harzianum showed the highest mycelial growth inhibition (60.37%), followed by Pseudomonas fluorescens (54.4%), and the least effective was showed by T. asperellum (37.44%). The field experiments were carried out in Kharif 2019-20 and 2020-21, to test the fruitfulness of in vitro studies along with some biopolymers. In Kharif 2019-20 out of all the treatments, effective treatment with least mean disease severity was observed in chitosan (12.50%) and nano silicon (14.79%) application when compared to the fungicide hexaconazole 5 EC (13.89%) which was used as a positive control and the least effective treatment was observed in seaweed extract (18.81%), followed by T. viride (19.0%) whereas, the untreated control showed 28.73% of disease severity. In Kharif 2020-21 chitosan (18.77%) and nano silicon (23.95%) treatments were effective when compared to the hexaconazole 5 EC (23.21%) and highest disease severity was observed in seaweed extract (37.0 %), followed by T. viride (34.81%), whereas the untreated control showed 51.6 % of mean disease severity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In dual culture, Trichoderma harzianum gave the highest inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani mycelial growth (60.37%).

Treatment
dual culturee4
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growth inhibitione1
Direction
higheste1
Value
60.37%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trichoderma harzianum showed the highest mycelial growth inhibition (60.37%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–647 · show in text ↑
e4

“by using dual culture and poisoned food techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In dual culture, Pseudomonas fluorescens inhibited Rhizoctonia solani mycelial growth (54.4%), followed by Trichoderma harzianum.

Treatment
dual culturee4
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growth inhibitione1
Direction
followed bye2
Value
54.4%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trichoderma harzianum showed the highest mycelial growth inhibition (60.37%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–647 · show in text ↑
e2

“followed by Pseudomonas fluorescens (54.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–692 · show in text ↑
e4

“by using dual culture and poisoned food techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In dual culture, Trichoderma asperellum gave the least mycelial growth inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani (37.44%).

Treatment
dual culturee4
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Second interactor
T. asperellumTrichoderma asperellume3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growth inhibitione1
Direction
least effectivee3
Value
37.44%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · Second interactorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trichoderma harzianum showed the highest mycelial growth inhibition (60.37%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–647 · show in text ↑
e3

“the least effective was showed by T. asperellum (37.44%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–754 · show in text ↑
e4

“by using dual culture and poisoned food techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Kharif 2019-20, chitosan had the least mean disease severity (12.50%) compared with hexaconazole 5 EC.

Treatment
chitosane5
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
mean disease severitye5
Direction
leaste5
Value
12.50%e5
Qualifier
13.89%e5
Comparator
hexaconazole 5 ECe5
Setting
In Kharif 2019-20e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Kharif 2019-20 out of all the treatments, effective treatment with least mean disease severity was observed in chitosan (12.50%) and nano silicon (14.79%) application when compared to the fungicide hexaconazole 5 EC (13.89%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Kharif 2019-20, nano silicon had the least mean disease severity (14.79%) compared with hexaconazole 5 EC.

Treatment
nano silicone5
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
mean disease severitye5
Direction
leaste5
Value
14.79%e5
Qualifier
13.89%e5
Comparator
hexaconazole 5 ECe5
Setting
In Kharif 2019-20e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Kharif 2019-20 out of all the treatments, effective treatment with least mean disease severity was observed in chitosan (12.50%) and nano silicon (14.79%) application when compared to the fungicide hexaconazole 5 EC (13.89%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Kharif 2019-20, seaweed extract was the least effective treatment (18.81% disease severity).

Treatment
seaweed extracte6
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
least effectivee6
Direction
least effectivee6
Value
18.81%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e6

“the least effective treatment was observed in seaweed extract (18.81%), followed by T. viride (19.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Kharif 2019-20, T. viride was the second least effective treatment (19.0% disease severity).

Treatment
T. viridee6
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Second interactor
T. virideTrichoderma viridee6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
least effectivee6
Direction
followed bye6
Value
19.0%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · Second interactorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e6

“the least effective treatment was observed in seaweed extract (18.81%), followed by T. viride (19.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1270 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The untreated control showed 28.73% disease severity in Kharif 2019-20.

Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye1
Value
28.73%e1
Qualifier
untreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“the untreated control showed 28.73% of disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Kharif 2020-21, chitosan was effective with 18.77% mean disease severity compared with hexaconazole 5 EC.

Treatment
chitosane7
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
mean disease severitye2
Direction
effectivee7
Value
18.77%e7
Qualifier
23.21%e7
Comparator
hexaconazole 5 ECe7
Setting
In Kharif 2020-21e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e7

“In Kharif 2020-21 chitosan (18.77%) and nano silicon (23.95%) treatments were effective when compared to the hexaconazole 5 EC (23.21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1472 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas the untreated control showed 51.6 % of mean disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Kharif 2020-21, nano silicon was effective with 23.95% mean disease severity compared with hexaconazole 5 EC.

Treatment
nano silicone7
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
mean disease severitye2
Direction
effectivee7
Value
23.95%e7
Qualifier
23.21%e7
Comparator
hexaconazole 5 ECe7
Setting
In Kharif 2020-21e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e7

“In Kharif 2020-21 chitosan (18.77%) and nano silicon (23.95%) treatments were effective when compared to the hexaconazole 5 EC (23.21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1472 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas the untreated control showed 51.6 % of mean disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Kharif 2020-21, seaweed extract had the highest disease severity (37.0%).

Treatment
seaweed extracte1
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye1
Direction
higheste1
Value
37.0 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest disease severity was observed in seaweed extract (37.0 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Kharif 2020-21, T. viride had the second highest disease severity (34.81%).

Treatment
T. viridee2
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Second interactor
T. virideTrichoderma viridee2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease severitye1
Direction
followed bye2
Value
34.81%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · Second interactorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest disease severity was observed in seaweed extract (37.0 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1542 · show in text ↑
e2

“followed by T. viride (34.81%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1574 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The untreated control showed 51.6% mean disease severity in Kharif 2020-21.

Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
mean disease severitye1
Value
51.6 %e1
Qualifier
untreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas the untreated control showed 51.6 % of mean disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1644 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma viride · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

chitosan · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

silicon atom · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

other · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.