Paper · 2020 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effects of Biofertilizers, Nano Zn Oxide and Nano Fe Oxide on Quantum Yield and Variation of Grain Filling of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Soil Salinity Condition

Khadije Babaie; Raouf Seyed Sharifi; Alireza Pirzad

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

In order to evaluate the effects of nano Zn oxide, nano Fe oxide and bio fertilizer on variation of some physiological traits and grain filling parameters of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under soil salinity, a factorial experiment was conducted based on randomized complete block design with three replications in research greenhouse of faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili in 2015. Treatments were included soil salinity in three levels, no-salt or control, salinity 25 and 50 mM respectively, by NaCl, seed inoculation by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria at four levels, no bio fertilizer (F1), seed inoculation by Azotobacter chroococcum strain 5 (F2), Azospirillum lipoferum strain OF (F3), Pseudomonas putida strain 186 (F4) and foliar application at four levels, without nano or foliar application by water as control, application of nano Zn oxide, nano Fe oxide and nano Fe-Zn oxide 1.5 g.lit-1). The results showed that the maximum grain filling components such as maximum of grain weight (0.049 g), grain filling rate (0.00172 g.day-1), grain filling period (52.85 days) and effective grain filling period (39.18 days) were obtained in no salinity, application of nano Zn-Fe oxide and seed inoculation by Pseudomonas. Similar results were obtained for chlorophyll index and quantum yield. Application of nano Zn-Fe oxide increased about 17.40% from grain yield in comparison with no application of nano oxide in the highest salinity level. Generally, it seems that bio fertilizer and nano Zn-Fe oxide can be used as a proper tool for increasing wheat yield under salinity condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No salinity plus nano Zn Fe oxide and Pseudomonas yielded maximum grain weight of 0.049 g.

Treatment
application of nano Zn-Fe oxide and seed inoculation by Pseudomonase0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.049 ge0
Qualifier
no salinitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the maximum grain filling components such as maximum of grain weight (0.049 g), grain filling rate (0.00172 g.day-1), grain filling period (52.85 days) and effective grain filling period (39.18 days) were obtained in no salinity, application of nano Zn-Fe oxide and seed inoculation by Pseudomonas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same no salinity treatment gave maximum grain filling rate of 0.00172 g.day-1.

Treatment
application of nano Zn-Fe oxide and seed inoculation by Pseudomonase0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
grain filling ratee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.00172 g.day-1e0
Qualifier
no salinitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the maximum grain filling components such as maximum of grain weight (0.049 g), grain filling rate (0.00172 g.day-1), grain filling period (52.85 days) and effective grain filling period (39.18 days) were obtained in no salinity, application of nano Zn-Fe oxide and seed inoculation by Pseudomonas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave a maximum grain filling period of 52.85 days.

Treatment
application of nano Zn-Fe oxide and seed inoculation by Pseudomonase0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
grain filling periode0
Direction
maximume0
Value
52.85 dayse0
Qualifier
no salinitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the maximum grain filling components such as maximum of grain weight (0.049 g), grain filling rate (0.00172 g.day-1), grain filling period (52.85 days) and effective grain filling period (39.18 days) were obtained in no salinity, application of nano Zn-Fe oxide and seed inoculation by Pseudomonas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave maximum effective grain filling period of 39.18 days.

Treatment
application of nano Zn-Fe oxide and seed inoculation by Pseudomonase0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
effective grain filling periode0
Direction
maximume0
Value
39.18 dayse0
Qualifier
no salinitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the maximum grain filling components such as maximum of grain weight (0.049 g), grain filling rate (0.00172 g.day-1), grain filling period (52.85 days) and effective grain filling period (39.18 days) were obtained in no salinity, application of nano Zn-Fe oxide and seed inoculation by Pseudomonas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll index and quantum yield followed similar favorable responses.

Treatment
application of nano Zn-Fe oxide and seed inoculation by Pseudomonase1
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase1symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll index and quantum yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar results were obtained for chlorophyll index and quantum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1342 · show in text ↑
e1

“no salinity, application of nano Zn-Fe oxide and seed inoculation by Pseudomonas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano Zn Fe oxide increased wheat grain yield by about 17.40% at the highest salinity.

Treatment
Application of nano Zn-Fe oxidee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.40%e0
Qualifier
highest salinity levele0
Comparator
no application of nano oxidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nano Zn-Fe oxide increased about 17.40% from grain yield in comparison with no application of nano oxide in the highest salinity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1493 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend bio fertilizer and nano Zn Fe oxide for increasing wheat yield under salinity.

Treatment
bio fertilizer and nano Zn-Fe oxidee0
Outcome
increasing wheat yielde0
Qualifier
under salinity conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bio fertilizer and nano Zn-Fe oxide can be used as a proper tool for increasing wheat yield under salinity condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1636 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Pseudomonas · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

oxide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Pseudomonas · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 36 positive, 6 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 34 positive, 8 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.