Paper · 2025 · Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment

Influence of Organic and Mineral Fertilizer on Soil Proprieties and Performance of Rice (Oryza sativa) in Casamance, Senegal

Pierre Claver Cesar Diedhiou; Pape Samba Sokhna; Antoine Sambou; et al.

14
claims
25
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Chemical fertilizers are a source of soil degradation. In order to mitigate soil degradation and to face the negative impacts of climate change, the use of organic fertilizers, accessible to small farmers can maintain the productivity of cereals including rice. The objective of this experiment is to study the effect of organo-mineral fertilizers on soil chemical properties, growth and physiology parameters and yield of rice. For this purpose, a completely randomized block design with three replications was adopted. Different organic (Fertinova, Organova and Fertinova + Organova) and mineral (NPK + Urea) fertilizers were applied to cultivate the NERICA L19 variety of rice. The soil chemical properties (pH), germination rate, growth, yield and physiological (chlorophyll content) parameters were assessed. The results revealed a germination rate of the grains varying between 87.5 and 100%. Fertinova and Fertinova + Organova had the highest germination rates. Soil pH decreased significantly from initial (6.71 ± 0.01) to final (5.73 ± 0.04) with the development cycle of the rice. Organo-mineral fertilizers influenced significantly (p = 5.36e−09) soil chemical properties by increasing pH (4%) compared to Control. Analysis of variance on growth and yield parameters, yield and chlorophyll content revealed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between fertilizers. Growth and yield parameters and yield were significantly higher in NPK and Fertinova + Organova than in Fertinova, Organova and Control. For the biomass the NPK + Urea recorded significantly highest biomass (488.28 ± 60.83 g). Leaves chlorophyll content varied significantly according to the daytime and the status of leaf development. The higher chlorophyll content was recorded at noon (27.96 ± 0.32 SPAD value) and with young leaves (30.21 ± 0.35 SPAD value). NPK + Urea (29.36 ± 0.45 SPAD value) and Fertinova (27.78 ± 0.40 SPAD value) favored more chlorophyll content in the rice leaves. Rice performed better in NPK + Urea and Fertinova + Organova fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice grain germination varied between 87.5 and 100%.

Outcome
germination rate of the grainse0
Value
87.5 and 100%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed a germination rate of the grains varying between 87.5 and 100%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertinova gave one of the highest rice germination rates.

Treatment
Fertinovae0
Outcome
germination ratese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertinova and Fertinova + Organova had the highest germination rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertinova plus Organova gave one of the highest rice germination rates.

Treatment
Fertinova + Organovae0
Outcome
germination ratese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertinova and Fertinova + Organova had the highest germination rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH declined significantly during the rice development cycle from 6.71 ± 0.01 to 5.73 ± 0.04.

Outcome
Soil pHe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
5.73 ± 0.04e0
Qualifier
6.71 ± 0.01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil pH decreased significantly from initial (6.71 ± 0.01) to final (5.73 ± 0.04) with the development cycle of the rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organo-mineral fertilizers significantly raised soil pH by 4% compared with control.

Treatment
Organo-mineral fertilizerse0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
4%e0
Comparator
Controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organo-mineral fertilizers influenced significantly (p = 5.36e−09) soil chemical properties by increasing pH (4%) compared to Control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice growth parameters, yield parameters, yield, and chlorophyll content differed significantly among fertilizers.

Treatment
fertilizerse0
Outcome
growth and yield parameters, yield and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of variance on growth and yield parameters, yield and chlorophyll content revealed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK produced significantly higher rice growth and yield parameters and yield than Fertinova, Organova, and control.

Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
Growth and yield parameters and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Fertinova, Organova and Controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and yield parameters and yield were significantly higher in NPK and Fertinova + Organova than in Fertinova, Organova and Control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertinova plus Organova produced significantly higher rice growth and yield parameters and yield than Fertinova, Organova, and control.

Treatment
Fertinova + Organovae0
Outcome
Growth and yield parameters and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Fertinova, Organova and Controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and yield parameters and yield were significantly higher in NPK and Fertinova + Organova than in Fertinova, Organova and Control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus Urea produced the highest biomass, 488.28 ± 60.83 g.

Treatment
NPK + Ureae0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
488.28 ± 60.83 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the biomass the NPK + Urea recorded significantly highest biomass (488.28 ± 60.83 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1601 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice leaf chlorophyll content varied significantly by time of day and leaf development status.

Organ / stage
status of leaf developmente0
Outcome
Leaves chlorophyll contente0
Qualifier
daytimee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves chlorophyll content varied significantly according to the daytime and the status of leaf development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content was higher at noon, at 27.96 ± 0.32 SPAD value.

Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
27.96 ± 0.32 SPAD valuee0
Qualifier
noone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher chlorophyll content was recorded at noon (27.96 ± 0.32 SPAD value) and with young leaves (30.21 ± 0.35 SPAD value).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1711–1837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content was higher in young leaves, at 30.21 ± 0.35 SPAD value.

Organ / stage
young leavese0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
30.21 ± 0.35 SPAD valuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher chlorophyll content was recorded at noon (27.96 ± 0.32 SPAD value) and with young leaves (30.21 ± 0.35 SPAD value).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1711–1837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus Urea favored rice leaf chlorophyll content, measured at 29.36 ± 0.45 SPAD value.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
NPK + Ureae0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
moree0
Value
29.36 ± 0.45 SPAD valuee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK + Urea (29.36 ± 0.45 SPAD value) and Fertinova (27.78 ± 0.40 SPAD value) favored more chlorophyll content in the rice leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1838–1967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertinova favored rice leaf chlorophyll content, measured at 27.78 ± 0.40 SPAD value.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Fertinovae0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
moree0
Value
27.78 ± 0.40 SPAD valuee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK + Urea (29.36 ± 0.45 SPAD value) and Fertinova (27.78 ± 0.40 SPAD value) favored more chlorophyll content in the rice leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1838–1967 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

85 papers: 73 positive, 12 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 115 positive, 9 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

279 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.