Abstract
Global climate changes affect all components of the biosphere and make adjustments to life and agricultural production. It is precisely because of changes in weather conditions (increased average monthly temperatures in the winter-summer periods, decreased precipitation levels) that the periods of the ontogenesis phases of plants and insects are disrupted, the course and activity of microbiological processes in the soil, including the destruction of organic residues, and persistent phytopathogenic complexes of microorganisms and phytophages accumulate in the soil. It is believed that one of the most effective methods of combating phytopathogenic microorganisms of agrocenoses that cause a complex of root rots in cereal crops is the use of biological products. The use of biological products allows obtaining healthy and resistant plants to the influence of adverse factors, forming a microbiocenosis in the rhizosphere of plants from agronomically beneficial microorganisms. The latter have a high level of competition and antagonistic properties towards phytopathogens. At the experimental field of the Skvyra Research Station of the Institute of Agroecology and Environmental Management of the NAAS, field studies were conducted in 2024 to determine the effect of the organic-mineral fertilizer of the Diamond grow of HUMI [K] BIO+«PLUS» brand on the yield and quality of spring wheat. A feature of OMD DG H[K] B+«PLUS» is its composition, which combines macro and microelements, humic acids, algae extract, and a complex of 16 strains of microorganisms. Among the bioagents of this fertilizer are the bacteria B. licheniformis, B. megaterium, B. subtilis, B. amyloliquefaciens, B. pumilus; micromycetes Glomus intraradices, G. mosseae, G. aggregatum, G. etunicatum, Rhizopogon villosulus, R. luteolus, R. amylopogon, R. fulvigleba, Pisolithus tinctorius, Scleroderma cepa, S. citrinum. The study was conducted on spring wheat of the Tokata variety. The effect of OMD DG H[K]B+ «PLUS» on wheat plants was determined by pre-sowing treatment of wheat seeds, treatment of vegetative plants, and a combination of treatment of seeds and vegetative plants. Biometric indicators of plants (plant height, leaf surface area), photosynthetic potential of spring wheat, and its yield were determined by generally accepted methods. It was established that the most effective is pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing season. It was found that this type of application contributes to an increase in plant height by 3.2%, leaf surface area by 19%, chlorophyll content by 11.7%, relative to the control. The yield of spring wheat was recorded at 3.7–3.84 t/ha, which is 0.18–0.34 t/ha higher than the yield of the control variant, an increase in protein content by 2.7–3.3% and gluten content by 3–5.6%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Combined seed and growing-season treatment was the most effective application.
- Taxon
- spring wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing seasone0
- Outcome
- most effectivee0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was established that the most effective is pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing season.”
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment increased plant height by 3.2% versus control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing seasone1
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 3.2%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“this type of application contributes to an increase in plant height by 3.2%, leaf surface area by 19%, chlorophyll content by 11.7%, relative to the control.”
e1“pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing season”
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment increased leaf surface area by 19% versus control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing seasone1
- Outcome
- leaf surface areae0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 19%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“this type of application contributes to an increase in plant height by 3.2%, leaf surface area by 19%, chlorophyll content by 11.7%, relative to the control.”
e1“pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing season”
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment increased chlorophyll content by 11.7% versus control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing seasone1
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 11.7%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“this type of application contributes to an increase in plant height by 3.2%, leaf surface area by 19%, chlorophyll content by 11.7%, relative to the control.”
e1“pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing season”
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring wheat yield was 3.7–3.84 t/ha, exceeding control by 0.18–0.34 t/ha.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing seasone1
- Outcome
- yield of spring wheate0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3.7–3.84 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 0.18–0.34 t/hae0
- Comparator
- control variante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield of spring wheat was recorded at 3.7–3.84 t/ha, which is 0.18–0.34 t/ha higher than the yield of the control variant”
e1“pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing season”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment increased protein content by 2.7–3.3%.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing seasone1
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 2.7–3.3%e0
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“an increase in protein content by 2.7–3.3% and gluten content by 3–5.6%”
e1“pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing season”
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e2“relative to the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment increased gluten content by 3–5.6%.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing seasone1
- Outcome
- gluten contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 3–5.6%e0
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“an increase in protein content by 2.7–3.3% and gluten content by 3–5.6%”
e1“pre-sowing seed treatment in combination with treatment during the growing season”
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e2“relative to the control.”
The same questions in other papers
climate site · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →seed treatment · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →climate site · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →seed treatment · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
150 papers more in this group
See all 154 papers →seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
289 papers more in this group
See all 293 papers →seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
297 papers more in this group
See all 301 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.