Paper · 2025 · Crop Science

Controlled‐release nitrogen application mitigated soil ammonia volatilization without compromising crop yields: a case study in Sichuan Basin paddy soil

Xinyue Li; Jingyue Liang; Bing Li; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Basal application of controlled‐release urea (CRU) combined with conventional urea has been proposed to better match the temporal nitrogen (N) demand of crops, reducing fertilization costs and offering greater practical applicability. Ammonia (NH 3 ) volatilization is considered a major pathway of N loss in paddy, yet its response to CRU remains unclear. To evaluate the effects of partially substituting urea with CRU on NH 3 volatilization and agronomic performance, field experiments were conducted in rice ( Oryza sativa L.)–wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and rice–rapeseed ( Brassica napus L.) rotation with different CRU substitution rates (0%, 10%, 20%, 40%, 80%, and 100%). Results showed that the 40%–100% CRU treatments effectively decreased surface water NH 4 + ‐N content and cumulative NH 3 volatilization compared to other fertilization treatments. In particular, compared with other treatments, the 40% CRU treatment significantly reduced the ratio of cumulative NH 3 volatilization to total N input to 8.4% in the rice–wheat rotation. In the rice–rapeseed rotation, the 40% CRU treatment increased grain yield, partial factor productivity of nitrogen, and apparent N‐fertilizer utilization efficiency. In the rice–wheat rotation, the 40% CRU treatment produced the tallest rice plants (52.71 cm), while in the rice–rapeseed rotation, it achieved the highest growth rate (25.97 kg hm −2 day −1 ). Their results demonstrate that replacing 40% of urea with CRU could effectively reduce NH 3 volatilization while simultaneously enhancing rice N accumulation and agronomic performance, particularly in rice–wheat rotation system in the Chengdu Plain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRU rates of 40–100% decreased surface water ammonium nitrogen compared with other fertilization treatments.

Treatment
40%–100% CRU treatmentse0
Outcome
surface water NH 4 + ‐N contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
other fertilization treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 40%–100% CRU treatments effectively decreased surface water NH 4 + ‐N content and cumulative NH 3 volatilization compared to other fertilization treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)–wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and rice–rapeseed ( Brassica napus L.) rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRU rates of 40–100% decreased cumulative ammonia volatilization compared with other fertilization treatments.

Treatment
40%–100% CRU treatmentse0
Outcome
cumulative NH 3 volatilizatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
other fertilization treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 40%–100% CRU treatments effectively decreased surface water NH 4 + ‐N content and cumulative NH 3 volatilization compared to other fertilization treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)–wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and rice–rapeseed ( Brassica napus L.) rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the rice–wheat rotation, 40% CRU significantly reduced ammonia loss as a share of nitrogen input to 8.4%.

Treatment
40% CRU treatmente0
Outcome
ratio of cumulative NH 3 volatilization to total N inpute0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8.4%e0
Qualifier
rice–wheat rotatione0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with other treatments, the 40% CRU treatment significantly reduced the ratio of cumulative NH 3 volatilization to total N input to 8.4% in the rice–wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In rice–rapeseed rotation, 40% CRU increased grain yield, nitrogen productivity and apparent nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency.

Treatment
40% CRU treatmente0
Outcome
grain yield, partial factor productivity of nitrogen, and apparent N‐fertilizer utilization efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
rice–rapeseed rotatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the rice–rapeseed rotation, the 40% CRU treatment increased grain yield, partial factor productivity of nitrogen, and apparent N‐fertilizer utilization efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In rice–wheat rotation, 40% CRU produced the tallest rice plants, 52.71 cm.

Treatment
40% CRU treatmente0
Outcome
tallest rice plantse0
Direction
talleste0
Value
52.71 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the rice–wheat rotation, the 40% CRU treatment produced the tallest rice plants (52.71 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In rice–rapeseed rotation, 40% CRU produced the highest growth rate, 25.97 kg hm−2 day−1.

Treatment
40% CRU treatmente2
Outcome
growth ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
25.97 kg hm −2 day −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the rice–rapeseed rotation, it achieved the highest growth rate (25.97 kg hm −2 day −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1420 · show in text ↑
e2

“the 40% CRU treatment increased grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1135 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)–wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and rice–rapeseed ( Brassica napus L.) rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–617 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing 40% of urea with CRU is proposed to reduce ammonia volatilization and improve rice nitrogen accumulation and agronomic performance.

Outcome
reduce NH 3 volatilization while simultaneously enhancing rice N accumulation and agronomic performancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“replacing 40% of urea with CRU could effectively reduce NH 3 volatilization while simultaneously enhancing rice N accumulation and agronomic performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1605 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 45 positive, 16 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 86 positive, 35 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

fertilization · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

135 papers: 113 positive, 22 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

131 papers more in this group

See all 135 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 199 positive, 20 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.