Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Role of zinc application from organic and biological sources on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity under semi-arid conditions

Ishor Mahat; Raghvendra Singh; Vinay Joseph Silas; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study was carried out during the Rabi season at the pot house of the Department of Agricultural Sciences and Allied Industries, Rama University, Kanpur, situated in the Central Plain Zone of Uttar Pradesh. The experiment aimed to evaluate the impact of various fertilizer treatments on wheat yield and soil fertility. The treatments included: T1 - Control, T2 - Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF; 120:60:40 kg ha⁻¹), T3 - RDF + 5 kg ZnSO₄ ha⁻¹, T4 - RDF + 10 kg ZnSO₄ ha⁻¹, T5 - RDF + Seed treatment with Zinc Solubilizing Bacteria (ZSB), T6 - RDF + ZnSO₄ ha⁻¹ + ZSB seed treatment, T7 - RDF + 10 kg ZnSO₄ ha⁻¹ + ZSB seed treatment. The treatments showed significant differences in their effects on soil fertility and the grain and straw yields of wheat. The application of 100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment resulted in significantly higher growth and yield parameters. These included plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g m⁻²), number of effective tillers (m⁻²), grains per spike, 1000-grain weight (g), harvest index (%), grain yield (38.40 q ha⁻¹), and straw yield (63.3 q ha⁻¹). The integration of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with biofertilizers notably enhanced the organic carbon content in soil. A combination of 100% NPK with FYM, ZnSO₄, Mn, and Fe yielded higher productivity and profitability, and also improved residual soil fertility after wheat cultivation. The highest bioavailable zinc levels were observed with foliar (30%) and soil application (28%). Across both tillage systems, maximum economic returns were achieved through zinc seed priming, with zero tillage (ZT) providing greater net benefits than conventional plough tillage (PT) due to reduced input costs. Overall, zinc application through various methods enhanced wheat productivity, economic returns, and grain biofortification under both PT and ZT conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments differed significantly in soil fertility and wheat grain and straw yield.

Outcome
soil fertility and the grain and straw yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments showed significant differences in their effects on soil fertility and the grain and straw yields of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment produced significantly higher plant height (cm).

Treatment
100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatmente0
Outcome
plant height (cm)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment resulted in significantly higher growth and yield parameters. These included plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g m⁻²), number of effective tillers (m⁻²), grains per spike, 1000-grain weight (g), harvest index (%), grain yield (38.40 q ha⁻¹), and straw yield (63.3 q ha⁻¹).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment produced significantly higher dry matter accumulation (g m⁻²).

Treatment
100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatmente0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation (g m⁻²)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment resulted in significantly higher growth and yield parameters. These included plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g m⁻²), number of effective tillers (m⁻²), grains per spike, 1000-grain weight (g), harvest index (%), grain yield (38.40 q ha⁻¹), and straw yield (63.3 q ha⁻¹).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment produced significantly higher number of effective tillers (m⁻²).

Treatment
100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatmente0
Outcome
number of effective tillers (m⁻²)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment resulted in significantly higher growth and yield parameters. These included plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g m⁻²), number of effective tillers (m⁻²), grains per spike, 1000-grain weight (g), harvest index (%), grain yield (38.40 q ha⁻¹), and straw yield (63.3 q ha⁻¹).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment produced significantly higher grains per spike.

Treatment
100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatmente0
Outcome
grains per spikee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment resulted in significantly higher growth and yield parameters. These included plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g m⁻²), number of effective tillers (m⁻²), grains per spike, 1000-grain weight (g), harvest index (%), grain yield (38.40 q ha⁻¹), and straw yield (63.3 q ha⁻¹).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment produced significantly higher 1000-grain weight (g).

Treatment
100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatmente0
Outcome
1000-grain weight (g)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment resulted in significantly higher growth and yield parameters. These included plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g m⁻²), number of effective tillers (m⁻²), grains per spike, 1000-grain weight (g), harvest index (%), grain yield (38.40 q ha⁻¹), and straw yield (63.3 q ha⁻¹).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment produced significantly higher harvest index (%).

Treatment
100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatmente0
Outcome
harvest index (%)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment resulted in significantly higher growth and yield parameters. These included plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g m⁻²), number of effective tillers (m⁻²), grains per spike, 1000-grain weight (g), harvest index (%), grain yield (38.40 q ha⁻¹), and straw yield (63.3 q ha⁻¹).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment produced significantly higher grain yield.

Treatment
100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
38.40 q ha⁻¹e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment resulted in significantly higher growth and yield parameters. These included plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g m⁻²), number of effective tillers (m⁻²), grains per spike, 1000-grain weight (g), harvest index (%), grain yield (38.40 q ha⁻¹), and straw yield (63.3 q ha⁻¹).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment produced significantly higher straw yield.

Treatment
100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatmente0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
63.3 q ha⁻¹e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 100% RDF combined with ZnSO₄ and ZSB seed treatment resulted in significantly higher growth and yield parameters. These included plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g m⁻²), number of effective tillers (m⁻²), grains per spike, 1000-grain weight (g), harvest index (%), grain yield (38.40 q ha⁻¹), and straw yield (63.3 q ha⁻¹).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated fertilizers and biofertilizers enhanced soil organic carbon.

Treatment
organic and inorganic fertilizers along with biofertilizerse0
Outcome
organic carbon content in soile0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The integration of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with biofertilizers notably enhanced the organic carbon content in soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined NPK, FYM, ZnSO₄, Mn and Fe higher productivity.

Treatment
100% NPK with FYM, ZnSO₄, Mn, and Fee0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of 100% NPK with FYM, ZnSO₄, Mn, and Fe yielded higher productivity and profitability, and also improved residual soil fertility after wheat cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined NPK, FYM, ZnSO₄, Mn and Fe higher profitability.

Treatment
100% NPK with FYM, ZnSO₄, Mn, and Fee0
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of 100% NPK with FYM, ZnSO₄, Mn, and Fe yielded higher productivity and profitability, and also improved residual soil fertility after wheat cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined NPK, FYM, ZnSO₄, Mn and Fe improved residual soil fertility.

Treatment
100% NPK with FYM, ZnSO₄, Mn, and Fee0
Outcome
residual soil fertilitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of 100% NPK with FYM, ZnSO₄, Mn, and Fe yielded higher productivity and profitability, and also improved residual soil fertility after wheat cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioavailable zinc was highest with foliar application at 30%.

Treatment
foliare0
Outcome
bioavailable zinc levelse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
30%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest bioavailable zinc levels were observed with foliar (30%) and soil application (28%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioavailable zinc was highest with soil application application at 28%.

Treatment
soil applicatione0
Outcome
bioavailable zinc levelse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
28%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest bioavailable zinc levels were observed with foliar (30%) and soil application (28%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc seed priming achieved maximum economic returns in both tillage systems.

Treatment
zinc seed priminge0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across both tillage systems, maximum economic returns were achieved through zinc seed priming, with zero tillage (ZT) providing greater net benefits than conventional plough tillage (PT) due to reduced input costs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1735 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage produced greater net benefits than conventional plough tillage.

Treatment
zero tillage (ZT)e0
Outcome
net benefitse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
conventional plough tillage (PT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across both tillage systems, maximum economic returns were achieved through zinc seed priming, with zero tillage (ZT) providing greater net benefits than conventional plough tillage (PT) due to reduced input costs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1735 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application enhanced wheat productivity under both tillage systems.

Treatment
zinc application through various methodse0
Outcome
wheat productivitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, zinc application through various methods enhanced wheat productivity, economic returns, and grain biofortification under both PT and ZT conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1892 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application enhanced economic returns under both tillage systems.

Treatment
zinc application through various methodse0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, zinc application through various methods enhanced wheat productivity, economic returns, and grain biofortification under both PT and ZT conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1892 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application enhanced grain biofortification under both tillage systems.

Treatment
zinc application through various methodse0
Outcome
grain biofortificatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, zinc application through various methods enhanced wheat productivity, economic returns, and grain biofortification under both PT and ZT conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1892 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

65 papers: 61 positive, 4 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

iron atom · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 19 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.