View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Stimulate® spraying lessened the decrease in relative water content under water limitation.
relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “relative water content had a less decrease , due to osmotic adjustment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1085 t0 “Eucalyptus urophylla
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 t1 “plants sprayed with Stimulate® ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–978 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought caused a decrease in relative water content .
Drought stress e0 relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Drought stress resulted in a sharp decrease of the relative water content and in crease of the membrane permeability and proline content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1095 t0 “Pear Seedling ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
DMTU partly alleviated the PEG- in duced decrease in relative water content .
relative water content e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “partially alleviated the root cell death and the decrease of the relative water content in duced by PEG 6000 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–544 t0 “rice roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High salinity caused a stronger decrease in relative water content without leaching.
relative water content e0 stronger decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “HSS-HWS determined a stronger decrease in leaf water potential and relative water content under No SL than SL ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–998 t0 “Sorghum bicolor
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
TMB2x9172 had the least decrease in relative water content under stress.
relative water content e0 least decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 ““TMB2x9172” showed the least decrease in relative water content and highest root-shoot ratio in crease under stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1623 t0 “banana ( Musa spp.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought-stressed alfalfa plants showed a significant decrease in relative water content of 7.45%.
drought-stressed e0 relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In drought-stressed alfalfa plants, we observed a significant decrease in the relative water content (7.45%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1057 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Only common bean had a significant decrease in relative water content .
relative water content e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Significant relative water content reduction was detected only in CB. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1636 t0 “Common Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–46 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d with in creasing NaCl.
NaCl concentration e1 relative water content e0 Verbatim
t0 “Azolla pinnata
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–79 e0 “with a decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–697 e1 “in creasing NaCl concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–654 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mineral nutrition caused a decrease in relative water content in spring wheat.
mineral nutrition e4 Verbatim
e0 “Water stress significantly made relative water content (RWC) in spring wheat leaves drop sharply ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1–97 e4 “The phenomenon of RWC decrease caused by mineral nutrition was also observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1201 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d leaf area and relative water content in mulberry, with a marked decrease only in severe stress.
leaf area and relative water content e2 a marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in 3-month-old mulberry plants at four levels of water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–148 e2 “Though leaf area and relative water content decrease d, significantly, a marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–380 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing salinity significantly reduced relative water content .
Increased salinity e0 relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In creased salinity resulted in a significant decrease in shoot and root biomass, relative water content and water potential. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–519 t0 “alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–82 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing soil water potential during vegetative and flowering stages caused a higher decrease in relative water content in pigeon pea cv. ICPL-151 than in cv. H-77-216.
vegetative and flowering stages e1 Decrease in soil water potential e1 relative water content e1 higher decrease e1 Verbatim
t0 “Response of pigeon pea cultivars to water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 e1 “Decrease in soil water potential during vegetative and flowering stages of two cultivars of pipeon pea (Cajanus cajari) caused higher decrease in relative water content in cv. ICPL-151 than in cv. H-77-216 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Longer water stress produced a proportional decrease in relative water content and leaf water potential in rice.
relative water content and leaf water potential e2 proportional decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “of Oryza sativa L. were subjected to water stress for 5, 8 or 10 days ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–219 e2 “produced a proportional decrease in relative water content and leaf water potential ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–352 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
As relative water content declined, Comet water potential tended to decrease faster than the other genotypes.
decrease more rapidly e0 as RWC declined e0 OK‐FH15 or Florunner e0 Verbatim
e0 “The data in dicated that as RWC declined, Comet ψ w tended to decrease more rapidly than either OK‐FH15 or Florunner. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1472 t0 “Peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 Other claims from this paper (19) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Declining relative water content partly explained the fall in leaf osmotic potential.
leaf osmotic potential e0 decrease in relative water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “fall in leaf osmotic potential was partly accounted for by a decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–778 t0 “APRICOT LEAVES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 10 % decrease in relative water content accompanied a 60-min ozone exposure of 0.55 ppm.
60-min ozone exposure of 0.55 ppm e7 relative water content e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “characteristics of primary bean leaves were studied in relation to ozone sensitivity and in jury ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–175 e7 “A 10 % decrease in relative water content accompanying a 60-min ozone exposure of 0.55 ppm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1025 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root cooling at +1°C in duced a decrease of about 2% in relative water content of the leaves.
relative water content of the leaves e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “a treatment which in duced a decrease of about 2% in relative water content of the leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–373 e2 “kept with the roots at +1°C in nutrient solution and with the shoots in air at 20°C for 24 h ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–283 t0 “Water Flow in Wheat Seedlings after Small Water Deficits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf diffusion resistance in creased as relative leaf water content decrease d.
decrease in RLWC e1 Verbatim
e0 “oat plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–796 e1 “LDR in creased with a decrease in RLWC ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–974 e2 “Leaf diffusion resistance (LDR) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–701 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Eucalyptus urophyllat0_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Pyrus communis
Oryza sativa
Sorghum bicolor
Musa
Medicago sativa
Phaseolus vulgaris
Azolla pinnata
Triticum aestivum
Cajanus cajan
Arachis hypogaea
Prunus armeniaca
Avena sativa