View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
not stated 54 Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress significantly decrease d relative water content and chlorophyll stability in dex.
relative water content, chlorophyll stability index e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Water stress was found to decrease significantly in the data of photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content , chlorophyll stability in dex ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–820 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Skipping irrigation at flowering decrease d relative water content in sunflower.
skipping irrigation at this stage e0 relative water content (RWC %) e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “skipping irrigation at this stage caused marked decrease in chlorophyll content in leaves, relative water content (RWC %) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1032 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cj rootstock showed the smallest decrease in leaf relative water content and leaf area under drought.
leaf relative water content and leaf area e1 Verbatim
e0 “Harumi tangor plants grafted onto Poncirus trifoliata (Pt), Citrus junos (Cj), and Citrus tangerine (Ct) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–320 e1 “The leaf relative water content and leaf area of the three rootstocks decrease d with in creasing drought stress, with the smallest decrease in Cj ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–466 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under water stress, YS-1L had a smaller decrease in leaf relative water content than other wheat species.
Stress treatment e0 much smaller decrease e0 other wheat species e0 Verbatim
e0 “Stress treatment caused a much smaller decrease in the leaf RWC and rise in MDA content in YS-1L compared to the other wheat species. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1417 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d wheat relative water content by 35.57%.
stressed conditions e0 relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the present study with 92 genotypes, a decrease of 35.57% for relative water content and 23.08% was observed for chlorophyll content in the stressed conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1124 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–58 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Chamran under I1 had the smallest relative water content decline relative to I4.
drought stress treatment (I1) e0 relative water content e0 lowest decrease e0 control treatment (I4) e0 Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–125 e0 “The Chamran cultivar (C1) on drought stress treatment (I1) had the lowest decrease in relative water content and total chlorophyll content than with control treatment (I4). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1352 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation significantly reduced chlorophyll a, b and relative water content .
deficit irrigation e0 chlorophyll a, b and relative water content e0 normal irrigation e1 Verbatim
e0 “deficit irrigation caused a significant decrease in grain yield and other agronomic traits, physiological characteristics (chlorophyll a, b and relative water content ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–802 e1 “normal irrigation, 80% of maximum daily crop evapotranspiration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–503 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect Deficit irrigation significantly reduced maize grain yield and agronomic traits. Intervention effect Deficit irrigation significantly reduced leaf area index, crop growth rate and relative growth rate. Intervention effect Water deficit increased leaf rolling percentage. Intervention effect With stronger deficit, SC705 chlorophyll a, b and relative water content fell more than in SC703 and SC704. Observation At severe stress, SC705 leaf rolling reached 60%. Observation SC705 had the highest grain yield, 8.51 t/ha, under normal irrigation. Observation SC705 had the highest biomass, 19.36 t/ha, under normal irrigation. Observation SC705 had minimum grain yield and biomass at 50% ETc. Intervention effect Increasing deficit from normal irrigation to 50% ETc significantly reduced SC705 leaf area index, plant growth rate and relative growth rate. Intervention effect Increasing deficit from normal irrigation to 50% ETc significantly reduced SC705 net photosynthesis rate. Recommendation The authors recommend preventing water deficit at critical maize growth stages. Recommendation The authors advise planting SC705 when enough irrigation water is available. Recommendation The authors consider SC704 suitable for water deficit, especially at 50% ETc. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d maize photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll, relative water content , height and yield.
net photosynthesis rate, leaf stomatal conductance, chlorophyll (Chl.) a+b, relative water content (RWC), plant height, and grain yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought caused a significant decrease in net photosynthesis rate, leaf stomatal conductance, chlorophyll (Chl.) a+b, relative water content (RWC), plant height, and grain yield of Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1123 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Increasing drought elevated CAT, SOD, APX, REC and proline. Intervention effect Moderate drought increased WUE by 5.8% relative to control. Intervention effect Severe drought increased WUE by 11.7% relative to control. Observation Clay-loam soil produced the maximum grain yield of 491.8 g. Intervention effect SAP under drought enhanced gas exchange, chlorophyll, water content, height and grain yield. Intervention effect SAP under drought decreased REC, proline, CAT, SOD and APX activity. Observation The 80 kg.ha-1 SAP rate gave the highest photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and chlorophyll, and 10 kg.ha-1 gave the lowest. Intervention effect SAP at 40 and 80 kg.ha-1 increased leaf relative water content. Intervention effect SAP at 10 and 20 kg.ha-1 had no significant effect on leaf relative water content versus control. Recommendation The authors recommend 80 kg.ha-1 SAP for drought in sandy and clay-loam soils. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation decrease d maize leaf chlorophyll, NDVI and relative water content .
defi cient irrigation e0 Leaf chlorophyll contents, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and Leaf relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Leaf chlorophyll content s, the normalized difference vegetation in dex (NDVI) and Leaf relative water content (RWC) were decrease d by defi cient irrigation ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 515–669 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit significantly decrease d relative water content , stomatal conductance, and osmotic adjustment.
water deficits e0 relative water content (RWC), stomatal conductance (gs), osmotic adjustment (Oadj) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–69 e0 “water deficits led to a significant decrease in relative water content (RWC), stomatal conductance (gs), osmotic adjustment (Oadj) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–607 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
S1 decrease d leaf relative water content by 17%.
S1 irrigation level e0 relative water content (RWC) of the leaf e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 e0 “The S1 irrigation level led to a decrease in Fv/Fm (5 %), relative water content (RWC) of the leaf (17 %) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–615 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower plant height, leaf area in dex, and relative water content .
salinity, drought, and simultaneous stresses e0 plant height, leaf area index, relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The plant height, leaf area in dex, relative water content , number of heads per plant, number of seeds per head, 1000-seeds weight, seed yield, oil content , net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate decrease under salinity, drought, and simultaneous stresses. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–801 t0 “safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower head number, seed number per head, and thousand-seed weight. Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower seed yield and oil content. Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate. Intervention effect The 10 dS m -1 salinity and 40% irrigation treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 92.6% at heading. Intervention effect The same stress treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 71.04% at stem elongation. Intervention effect The same stress treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 89.9% at flowering. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly decrease d photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance and relative water content .
photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–665 t0 “cluster bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly decrease d chlorophyll stability in dex.
chlorophyll stability index e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content , chlorophyll stability in dex ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–694 t0 “cluster bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly decrease d plant height in clusterbean.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate (at flowering stage), stomatal conductance, relative water content , chlorophyll stability in dex, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant height, pod length, leaf area in dex, test weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest in dex and K+ and Na+ content in grain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–876 t0 “clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought and salt stress significantly reduced relative water content and water potential.
individual and combined treatments of drought and salt stress e0 relative water content, and water potential e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “All physiological traits, relative water content , and water potential decrease d significantly in all soybean genotypes due to in dividual and combined treatments of drought and salt stress, with significantly less decrease in soybean genotypes G4620RX, DM45X61, and NARC-21. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–1067 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Coatings suppressed in creasing soybean seed water content relative to control.
coating treatment e0 suppressthe increase e0 during storage e1 Verbatim
e0 “coating treatment could significantly suppressthe in crease in water content and the decrease in protein and fat levels compared to the control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–896 t0 “seed soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 e1 “Two varietiesof soybean seed and three coating treatments (control, CS, and CSNPs) were used during storage for six months. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–645 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Genotype BD2333 had the largest decrease in seeds per pod (56.20%) under drought compared with control conditions.
largest decrease e1 control conditions e1 Verbatim
t1 “Soybean Genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–51 e1 “BD2333 exhibited the largest decrease in plant height (37.10%), pod number plant−1 (85.90%), SP (56.20%), HSW (54.20%), gs (90.50%), Pn (71.00%), transpiration rate (59.40%), relative water content (34.40%), Chl a (79.50%), total Chls (72.70%), and carotenoids (56.70%), along with the maximum in crease in water saturation deficit (290.40%) and malondialdehyde content (280.30%) under drought compared to control conditi… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1868–2291 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Susceptible genotypes had a significant decrease in relative water content under salinity.
ICC 249 & ICC 247 e0 salinity stress t0 relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “significant decrease in total chlorophyll and relative water content in susceptible genotypes (ICC 249 & ICC 247) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1039 t0 “Screening and evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for salinity stress tolerance: A biochemical, physiological and yield assessment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–148 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity reduced chickpea chlorophyll content , relative water content and water retention capacity.
salinity stress e0 chlorophyll content, a decrease in relative water content, a decline in water retention capacity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “salinity stress which in cluded a reduction in chlorophyll content , a decrease in relative water content , a decline in water retention capacity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1668 e1 “salinity stress on chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–289 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher NaCl significantly reduced chickpea leaf relative water content by approximately 16.9% at the highest dose.
Increased levels of NaCl e0 leaf relative water content e0 approximately 16.9% e0 Verbatim
e0 “In creased levels of NaCl in the growing medium caused a significant decrease in leaf relative water content , where the percentage of reduction at the highest salt level was approximately 16.9% compared to the control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–807 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d water status (membrane stability in dex and relative water content ) in faba bean.
water status (membrane stability index and relative water content) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Plants exposed to water stress presented a significant decrease in plant height, dry matter, leave area, chlorophyll content (SPAD), the quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm, Fv/F0, and PI), water status (membrane stability in dex and relative water content ), and seed yield. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1239 t0 “Vicia faba L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–72 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d chlorophyll content (SPAD) in faba bean.
chlorophyll content (SPAD) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Plants exposed to water stress presented a significant decrease in plant height, dry matter, leave area, chlorophyll content (SPAD), the quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm, Fv/F0, and PI), water status (membrane stability in dex and relative water content ), and seed yield. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1239 t0 “Vicia faba L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–72 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d plant height in faba bean.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Plants exposed to water stress presented a significant decrease in plant height, dry matter, leave area, chlorophyll content (SPAD), the quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm, Fv/F0, and PI), water status (membrane stability in dex and relative water content ), and seed yield. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1239 t0 “Vicia faba L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–72 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease cottonseed seed vitality.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “WD significantly in creased the relative protein content of cottonseed but decrease d the relative oil content , leading to a decrease in seed vitality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1908 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–135 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d cottonseed relative oil content .
relative oil content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “WD significantly in creased the relative protein content of cottonseed but decrease d the relative oil content , leading to a decrease in seed vitality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1908 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–135 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit in creased cottonseed relative protein content of cottonseed.
relative protein content of cottonseed e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “WD significantly in creased the relative protein content of cottonseed but decrease d the relative oil content , leading to a decrease in seed vitality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1908 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–135 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought from flowering and pod formation decrease d leaf relative water content and stomatal conductance.
drought from flowering and pod formation stages e0 leaf relative water content, stomatal conductance e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Occurring drought from flowering and pod formation stages led to significant in crease in leaf temperature and significant decrease in leaf relative water content , stomatal conductance, pods per plant, 1000 seeds weight, seed and oil yields. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–859 t0 “oilseed rape ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–73 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d seed and oil yields.
drought from flowering and pod formation stages e0 seed and oil yields e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Occurring drought from flowering and pod formation stages led to significant in crease in leaf temperature and significant decrease in leaf relative water content , stomatal conductance, pods per plant, 1000 seeds weight, seed and oil yields. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–859 t0 “oilseed rape ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–73 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d pods per plant and 1000 seeds weight.
drought from flowering and pod formation stages e0 pods per plant, 1000 seeds weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Occurring drought from flowering and pod formation stages led to significant in crease in leaf temperature and significant decrease in leaf relative water content , stomatal conductance, pods per plant, 1000 seeds weight, seed and oil yields. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–859 t0 “oilseed rape ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–73 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays
Carthamus tinctorius
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Glycine max
Cicer arietinum
Vicia faba
Gossypium hirsutum_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Brassica napus