Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judge nutrient conditioning of little advantage to transplant growers.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
PNCe0
Outcome
little advantagee0

Verbatim

e0

“PNC offers the transplant grower little advantage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–835
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–116

Title

Cell Size and Pretransplant Nutritional Conditioning Influence Growth and Yield of Transplanted `Jubilee' Watermelon

Charles J. Graham; James T. Payne; Eric J. Molnar HortTechnology 2000. doi:10.21273/horttech.10.1.199

Other claims from this paper (13)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A second in-crop glyphosate application offered little or no advantage over one.

Treatment
applying glyphosate twicee0
Outcome
little or no advantagee0
Direction
little or noe0
Comparator
once in-crope0

Verbatim

e0

“There was little or no advantage to applying glyphosate twice compared with once in-crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1077
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43

Title

Comparison of a Glyphosate-Resistant Canola (Brassica napusL.) System with Traditional Herbicide Regimes

John T. O'Donovan; K. Neil Harker; George W. Clayton; et al. Weed Technology 2006. doi:10.1614/wt-05-092r.1

Other claims from this paper (8)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Millet offered little advantage over spring sown ryegrass for summer forage.

Taxon
millete0
Outcome
little advantagee0
Comparator
spring-sown ryegrass pasturee0

Verbatim

e0

“there is little advantage in establishing millet or oats over a spring-sown ryegrass pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–596

Title

The yield, quality and irrigation response of summer forage crops suitable for a dairy pasture renovation program in north-western Tasmania

R. J. Eckard; A. A. Salardini; M. Hannah; et al. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2001. doi:10.1071/ea00053

Other claims from this paper (16)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oats offered little advantage over spring sown ryegrass for summer forage.

Outcome
little advantagee0
Comparator
spring-sown ryegrass pasturee0

Verbatim

e0

“there is little advantage in establishing millet or oats over a spring-sown ryegrass pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–596

Title

The yield, quality and irrigation response of summer forage crops suitable for a dairy pasture renovation program in north-western Tasmania

R. J. Eckard; A. A. Salardini; M. Hannah; et al. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2001. doi:10.1071/ea00053

Other claims from this paper (16)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The selected simultaneous intercrops offered little advantage over monocropped maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
simultaneous planting of the crop species selected has little advantagee0
Comparator
monocropped maizee0

Verbatim

e0

“simultaneous planting of the crop species selected has little advantage over monocropped maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1657

Title

Effect of cropping systems on cereal stemborers in the cool‐wet and semi‐arid ecozones of the Amhara region of Ethiopia

M. Wale; F. Schulthess; Eunice W. Kairu; et al. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1461-9563.2007.00324.x

Other claims from this paper (10)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Starter fertilizer offers little advantage on high P sandy soils.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Outcome
little advantage to using starter fertilizere0
Setting
high-P sandy soilse0

Verbatim

e0

“there is little advantage to using starter fertilizer on flue-cured tobacco grown on high-P sandy soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1490

Title

EFFECTS OF STARTER FERTILIZER, GRANULAR PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER, TIME OF FERTILIZATION, AND SEEDLING PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATION ON FLUE-CURED TOBACCO GROWTH AND NUTRITION

James W. Rideout; Dewitt T. Gooden Tobacco Science 2000. doi:10.3381/0082-4623-44.1.19

Other claims from this paper (10)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Animal response data showed little advantage of T44 over Coastal.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylone0
Material
T44e7
Outcome
animal responsee7
Direction
little advantagee7
Comparator
CBe7

Verbatim

e0

“Compared are dry matter (DM) intake and digestion of Coastal bermudagrass (CB), T44, and T85 hays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–336
e7

“In general, animal response data showed little advantage of T44 in comparison with CB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1364

Title

Dry Matter Intake and Digestibility of ‘Coastal’, ‘Tifton 44’, and ‘Tifton 85’ Bermudagrass Hays Grown in the U.S. Upper South

J. C. Burns; D. S. Fisher Crop Science 2007. doi:10.2135/cropsci06.04.0253

Other claims from this paper (12)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed use of modified atmosphere bags offered little or no pear quality advantage regardless of prior storage type.

Taxon
PEARSPyrust0
Treatment
use of modified atmosphere bags was delayede0
Outcome
quality advantagee0
Direction
Little or noe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Little or no quality advantage was evident if use of modified atmosphere bags was delayed regardless of prior storage type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1296
t0

““BARTLETT” PEARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–56

Title

QUALITY OF MODIFIED ATMOSPHERE PACKAGED “BARTLETT” PEARS AS INFLUENCED BY TIME AND TYPE OF STORAGE

S.R. DRAKE; S.R. DRAKE; D.C. ELFVING; et al. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4549.2004.23051.x

Other claims from this paper (4)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that even under well managed rainfed arid-zone environments current hybrids offer farmers little advantage over traditional landraces.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
little advantage over their traditional landracese0

Verbatim

t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–52
e0

“even under well managed, but rainfed, arid zone environments, current hybrids offer farmers little advantage over their traditional landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1102

Title

Performance of landraces and hybrids of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] under good management in the arid zone

F. R. Bidinger; M. M. Sharma; O. P. Yadav Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) 2008

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starter fertilizer provided little agronomic advantage and no yield change versus untreated control.

Treatment
starter fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no positive or negative effecte0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Little agronomic advantage was found in starter fertilizer, with no positive or negative effect on yield when compared to an untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2518–2661
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 28–34

Title

Fertilization Strategies of Cotton in North Carolina

Andrew David Hunt NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries) 2009

Other claims from this paper (18)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.