View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fumigation did not decrease purple nutsedge density .
purple nutsedge e0 weed purple nutsedge density e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Eggplant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 e0 “Fumigation and fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1358 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density .
purple nutsedge e0 weed purple nutsedge density e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Eggplant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 e0 “Fumigation and fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1358 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing orchard density did not significantly decrease yield.
increasing the density e0 does not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “SOUR CHERRY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 e0 “in creasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1938 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fumigation did not decrease purple nutsedge density .
purple nutsedge e0 weed purple nutsedge density e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Eggplant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 e0 “Fumigation and fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1358 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density .
purple nutsedge e0 weed purple nutsedge density e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Eggplant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 e0 “Fumigation and fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1358 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Leafhopper abundance did not decrease with greater trichome density .
leafhopper e0 pest leafhopper abundance e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “leafhopper abundance did not decrease as trichome density in creased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1169 t0 “on potato. Natural variation in trichome density among 17 potato cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–751 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease stomatal density in barley.
stomatal density e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease d stomatal density in tomato, but not in barley. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–849 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Appressed membrane particle density did not decrease at 1°C.
density of particles on the appressed exoplasmic fracture face e0 Verbatim
e0 “no decrease in the density of particles on the appressed exoplasmic fracture face ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–738 t0 “Attached leaves of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L. cv. Jattiläismeloni) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–66 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing salinity did not decrease stomatal density .
stomatal density e0 did not decrease e0 intermediate salinity site e0 Verbatim
e0 “in creasing salinities did not decrease stomatal density ( in termediate salinity site: 73.4 stomata.mm2 SD= 13.5; high salinity site: 74.8 stomata.mm2 SD= 17.3) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2232–2390 t0 “Rhizophora mangle
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing orchard density did not significantly decrease yield.
increasing the density e0 does not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “SOUR CHERRY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 e0 “in creasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1938 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing salinity did not decrease stomatal density .
stomatal density e0 did not decrease e0 intermediate salinity site e0 Verbatim
e0 “in creasing salinities did not decrease stomatal density ( in termediate salinity site: 73.4 stomata.mm2 SD= 13.5; high salinity site: 74.8 stomata.mm2 SD= 17.3) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2232–2390 t0 “Rhizophora mangle
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Espalier training with a trellis in high density hedgerows did not decrease yield.
training to an espalier shape e0 does not decrease e0 with and without a trellis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “olives ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 e0 “training to an espalier shape, with and without a trellis, in high density hedgerows, does not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–879 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pubescence density did not consistently in crease or decrease between anthesis and shuckoff.
Pubescence density e2 no_change inferred e2 between anthesis and shuckoff e2 Verbatim
e0 “peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch. cv. June Gold] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–100 e2 “Pubescence density did not consistently in crease or decrease between anthesis and shuckoff, but did show a major decrease on ripe fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–459 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease stomatal density in barley.
stomatal density e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease d stomatal density in tomato, but not in barley. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–849 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
BSO did not decrease lateral root density .
buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) e0 Lateral root (LR) density e1 Not reported Taxon Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “but not by the GSH synthesis in hibitor, buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–483 t0 “root architecture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 e1 “Lateral root (LR) density was significantly decrease d in GSH synthesis mutants (cad2-1, pad2-, rax1-) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–413 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Green waste mulch did not decrease grass density .
city green‐waste mulch e1 did not result in decreased e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Native Shrubland ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 e0 “did not result in decrease d grass density or in creased native shrub establishment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–931 e1 “The city green‐waste mulch used in this study ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–796 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeated defoliation did not significantly decrease rhizome bud and shoot density and biomass of Carex brevicuspis over two consecutive years.
rhizome buds e1 repeated defoliation e1 density and biomass of rhizome buds and shoots e1 did not decrease e1 over two consecutive years e1 Dongting Lake wetlands, China e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the wetland sedge Carex brevicuspis C. B. Clarke in the Dongting Lake wetlands, China ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–447 e1 “The density and biomass of rhizome buds and shoots did not decrease significantly in response to repeated defoliation over two consecutive years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–593 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Burning did not change foliar cover and density of in termediate grasses.
Fire treatments e0 intermediate grasses e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Fire treatments, regardless of frequency, in duced an in crease in foliar cover and density in desirable grasses, no changes in in termediate grasses, and a decrease in undesirable grasses. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–719 t0 “grass species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
SEC3A puncta density did not decrease after these cells stopped growing.
density of puncta e0 does not decrease e0 after growth termination e0 Verbatim
t0 “Arabidopsis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–15 e0 “The density of puncta does not decrease after growth termination of these cells, but decrease s strongly when exocytosis is in hibited by treatment with brefeldin A. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1098 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Solanum melongenat0
Prunus cerasus
Solanum tuberosum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Rhizophora mangle
Olea
Prunus persica
Arabidopsis