View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increased leaf damage (33.4% leaf area loss) produced fewer flowers than natural leaf damage .
increased leaf damage treatment e1 natural leaf damage plants e1 Verbatim
e0 “Oenothera macrocarpa (Onagraceae)
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–742 e1 “Plants in the increased leaf damage treatment (33.4% leaf area loss) produced fewer flowers than natural leaf damage plants (6.5% leaf area loss) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1353 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Prior leaf damage increased the probability of future leaf damage .
probability of leaf damage in succeeding years e0 Verbatim
e0 “Ramets that suffered leaf damage in 1 year experienced an increased probability of leaf damage in succeeding years. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–520 t0 “Trientalis europaea
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–70 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Artificial leaf damage did not reduce leaf -miner survival.
leaf-miner e0 pest leaf-miner survival e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “leaf -miner survival was not reduced by leaf damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–648 t0 “Beech ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 Other claims from this paper (1) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean variety affected leaf damage , pod damage and production.
leaf damage, pod damage, and production e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 e0 “Results indicated that variety affects pest diversity and abundance, however, it affected leaf damage , pod damage , and production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–895 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Overall tomato flower damage was lower than leaf damage .
Verbatim
e0 “Overall flower damage was lower than leaf damage . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1405 t0 “Solanum lycopersicum
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 Other claims from this paper (3) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend a mechanical damage experiment to examine wheat flag- leaf damage .
mechanical damage experiment e0 Verbatim
e0 “The need for a mechanical damage experiment is obvious ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1025 e1 “wheat flag leaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–350 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf damage affected under 3% of accessions.
Verbatim
t0 “apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 e0 “(<3%) by leaf damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1048 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf damage increased relative growth rate.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Leaf damage resulted in an increase of RGR ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1040 t0 “Vallisneria spiralis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–109 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors suspected probe introduction caused no leaf damage .
Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “it was suspected that no leaf damage was occurred ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1211 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf damage affected under 3% of accessions.
Verbatim
t0 “apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 e0 “(<3%) by leaf damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1048 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Artificial leaf damage did not reduce leaf -miner survival.
leaf-miner e0 pest leaf-miner survival e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “leaf -miner survival was not reduced by leaf damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–648 t0 “Beech ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf damage and rotten wood were the most common types of tree damage .
leaf damage and rotten wood e0 The most types of tree damage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The most types of tree damage were leaf damage and rotten wood ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1082 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increased leaf damage (33.4% leaf area loss) produced fewer flowers than natural leaf damage .
increased leaf damage treatment e1 natural leaf damage plants e1 Verbatim
e0 “Oenothera macrocarpa (Onagraceae)
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–742 e1 “Plants in the increased leaf damage treatment (33.4% leaf area loss) produced fewer flowers than natural leaf damage plants (6.5% leaf area loss) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1353 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf damage also increased twining rate in I. purpurea .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Jasmonic acid increased twining rate in I. purpurea , as did leaf damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1103 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf removal at panicle initiation caused the least damage in rice.
panicle initiation (PI) e5 Verbatim
e5 “least damage from leaf removal at panicle initiation (PI) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1242 t0 “Simulated Hail Damage to Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–29 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Prior leaf damage increased the probability of future leaf damage .
probability of leaf damage in succeeding years e0 Verbatim
e0 “Ramets that suffered leaf damage in 1 year experienced an increased probability of leaf damage in succeeding years. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–520 t0 “Trientalis europaea
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–70 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf damage reduced rosette size in the year of damage .
the year of damage e0 Verbatim
e0 “Leaf damage reduced rosette size the year of damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1263 e1 “Arabidopsis lyrata
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–298 e2 “leaf (0 vs. 50% of the area of each leaf removed) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–688 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf damage and rotten wood were the most common types of tree damage .
leaf damage and rotten wood e0 The most types of tree damage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The most types of tree damage were leaf damage and rotten wood ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1082 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Assay results correlated well with leaf dry-weight measurements and visual leaf damage estimates.
Results from this assay e0 leaf dry-weight measurements, and visual leaf damage estimates e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Results from this assay correlated well with simulated damage levels, insect infestation levels, leaf dry-weight measurements, and visual leaf damage estimates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–482 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
S2 NDVI detected only severe leaf damage .
severe leaf damage was detected e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “only severe leaf damage was detected using the S2 NDVI ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1400 t0 “vineyards ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The model quantifies soybean leaf damage severity and distinguishes healthy from unhealthy leaves.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 e0 “The model quantifies damage severity, distinguishing healthy/unhealthy leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–858 Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Damage area, damage score and leaf length had very high broad-sense heritability.
Damage area, damage score and leaf length e1 very high broad-sense heritability across three environments e1 Verbatim
t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–144 e1 “Damage area, damage score and leaf length showed very high broad-sense heritability across three environments. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1254 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Overexpression of AtNUP62 in Nicotiana benthamiana causes significant leaf tissue damage .
leaf tissue e0 damage to leaf tissue e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Overexpression of AtRAN1 or AtNUP62 in Nicotiana benthamiana causes significant damage to leaf tissue. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–362 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Overexpression of AtRAN1 in Nicotiana benthamiana causes significant leaf tissue damage .
leaf tissue e0 Overexpression of AtRAN1 e0 damage to leaf tissue e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Overexpression of AtRAN1 or AtNUP62 in Nicotiana benthamiana causes significant damage to leaf tissue. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–362 Other claims from this paper (2)
not stated 4 Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Monitoring in-season leaf damage can help project the end-of-season local impact of Ophraella communa on Ambrosia artemisiifolia and inform management.
the monitoring of the in-season leaf damage e7 Verbatim
e7 “the monitoring of the in-season leaf damage can help to project the local impact of O. communa on A. artemisiifolia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1500 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Oil produced necrosis and anatomical damage .
leaf necrosis, and severe anatomical damages e0 Verbatim
e0 “leaf necrosis, and severe anatomical damage s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1207 t0 “Amaranthus viridis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–106 Other claims from this paper (5) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Combining SA and SPM in a sustainable agricultural system can be viewed as a successful technique for reducing salt damage in wheat.
reducing salt damage e4 Verbatim
e1 “by increasing mineral acquisition, chlorophyll a and b contents, antioxidant enzymes activity, osmolytes accumulation, leaf water content, grains carbohydrate and protein content as well as reducing Na + accumulation, membrane electrolyte leakage, malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide contents, exogenously applied SA and/or SPM significantly reduced the detrimental impacts of soil salinization and increased wheat gro… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–900 e4 “combining SA and SPM in a sustainable agricultural system can be viewed as a successful technique for reducing salt damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1305 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oenothera macrocarpa
Lysimachia europaea
Glycine max
Solanum lycopersicum
Triticum aestivum
Malus domestica
Vallisneria spiralis
Ipomoea purpurea
Oryza sativa
Arabidopsis lyrata
Nicotiana benthamiana
Ambrosia artemisiifolia
Amaranthus viridis