View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
In the field, relative water content of Nicotiana glauca did not decrease with drought.
relative water content (RWC) e0 no_change inferred e0 Verbatim
t0 “in the cosmopolitan in vader Nicotiana glauca ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–95 e0 “In the field, water potential, photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal conductance (gs), but not relative water content (RWC) decrease d because of drought ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–722 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Specific leaf water content did not significantly decrease during drought stress.
drought stress e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 e0 “SLFW and SLWC did not significantly decrease during drought stress period. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1364 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content , RNA, and protein were unchanged before visible wilt in in fected leaves.
relative water content, RNA, and protein levels e0 before the appearance of visible wilt e0 Verbatim
t0 “Chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflorum (Ramat.) Kitam)
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–170 t1 “Verticillium dahliae
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–56 e0 “No changes in relative water content , RNA, and protein levels and a slight decrease in chlorophyll level were detected within in fected leaf tissue before the appearance of visible wilt. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–715 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In fection by Albugo Candida caused a nonsignificant decrease of relative water content in Cakile maritima .
relative water content e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Puccinia lagenophorae , in fecting Senecio glaucus and Albugo Candida in fecting Cakile maritima during late in fection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–452 e1 “The in fection of Senecio caused a significant decrease of relative water content , while the in fection of Cakile caused a nonsignificant decrease of the same parameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–770 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoots of tomato plants with only half of the roots water ed showed no decrease in relative water content .
only half of the roots were watered e4 relative water content e4 Verbatim
e1 “The expression of four genes, le4, le16, le20, and le25, which require in creased ABA content for expression, was studied in tomato plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–304 e4 “Shoots of plants in which only half of the roots were water ed showed no decrease in relative water content and no in crease in ABA content ; however, three of the four genes, le4, le16, and le20, were in duced ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1362 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The most negative leaf water potential was not associated with greatest leaf firing or decrease d leaf extension.
leaf firing or decrease in leaf extension e0 not associated e0 most negative LWP e0 Verbatim
e0 “The most negative LWP was not associated with the greatest leaf firing or decrease in leaf extension. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1323 t0 “Creeping Bentgrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–79 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Green manure did not decrease subsequent wheat season soil water content and storage in the first two years.
soil water content and storage e0 did not decrease e0 0–200 cm layer e0 Verbatim
e0 “GM did not decrease the soil water content and storage (0–200 cm layer) during the subsequent winter wheat season, relative to BL ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1276 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
None of the tested maple species showed a significant decline in leaf relative water content under drought.
one month long summer drought e1 leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “none from tested species showed a significant decrease in leaf relative water content in dicating stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–738 t0 “maples (Acer sp.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–67 e1 “reactions of juvenile plants of eight maple species to one month long summer drought ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–511 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought days showed no change in the relative water content of F. rukam in Sekarmojo.
the number of DD e4 no_change inferred e4 Verbatim
t0 “Variation of Phenology of Flacourtia rukam in Two Different Habitats ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 e4 “the number of DD contributed to a decrease in the RWC value in PBG only, not in Sekarmojo ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1568 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Conditioning treatments generally did not reduce greenhouse eggplant growth relative to controls.
mechanical stress or exogenous abscisic acid (ABA) e1 growth responses e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Treatments generally did not decrease growth responses relative to controls during a 3-day conditioning period in the greenhouse ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1783–1911 e1 “Greenhouse-grown eggplant were treated with mechanical stress or exogenous abscisic acid (ABA) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1740 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 100% relative humidity, chilling caused no significant fall in leaf soluble protein.
chilled at 5°C, 100% r.h. e0 leaf soluble protein e0 no significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “When plants of each species were chilled at 5°C, 100% r.h., water loss was greatly reduced or prevented and there was no significant decrease in leaf soluble protein ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1342 e1 “pea (chill-resistant), mung bean (highly chill-sensitive), and tomato and french bean ( in termediate chilling-sensitivity) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–344 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Mineral nutrition did not affect chlorophyll or MDA content in spring wheat.
mineral nutrition e4 Verbatim
e0 “Water stress significantly made relative water content (RWC) in spring wheat leaves drop sharply ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1–97 e4 “The phenomenon of RWC decrease caused by mineral nutrition was also observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1201 e7 “But this decrease didn't affect Chl and MDA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1246 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pretreatment with benzyladenine did not prevent the decrease in reducing sugar content s relative to unpulsed leaves.
Cut leaves e0 Pretreatment with BA e3 reducing sugar contents e3 no_change inferred e3 unpulsed leaves e2 Verbatim
e0 “Cut leaves of Zantedeschia aethiopica and Z. elliottiana ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–66 e2 “Pulsed and unpulsed leaves were kept either in water or in the preservative ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–584 e3 “Pretreatment with BA did not counteract a decrease in reducing sugar content s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–807 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Before visible wilt, in fected leaves showed no changes in relative water content , permeability, RNA, or protein.
relative water content, tissue permeability, RNA, and protein levels e0 Verbatim
e0 “No changes in relative water content , tissue permeability, RNA, and protein levels and only a slight decrease in chlorophyll level were detected within in fected leaf tissue before the appearance of visible wilt. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–528 t0 “chrysanthemum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–34 e1 “Verticillium dahliae Kleb. in vaded and colonized chrysanthemum leaf tissue before symptom expression. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–205 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Nicotiana glauca
Capsicum.jpeg?width=60){kind=small}
Chrysanthemum
Verticillium dahliae.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Cakile maritima
Albugo candida
Solanum lycopersicum
Agrostis stolonifera
Triticum aestivum
Acer
Flacourtia rukam
Solanum melongena
Lathyrus oleraceus
Zantedeschia aethiopica_Zantedeschia_elliottiana.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Zantedeschia elliottiana