View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
not stated 16 Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Average seedling dry weight did not decrease after acetone immersion.
OutcomeAverage seedling dry weight e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “8 hours of immersion in acetone. Average seedling dry weight , however, did not decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–832 t0 “Sweet Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–33 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nematode exposure did not significantly decrease root and shoot dry weight in subterranean clover cv Denmark.
Taxonwhite and annual clovers t0 Outcomeplant root and shoot dry weight e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in plant root and shoot dry weight when exposed to nematodes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1102 t0 “white and annual clovers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–57 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Chlorflurenol did not significantly decrease plant fresh and dry weight .
Treatmentthis morphactin e0 Outcomefresh and dry weights e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “However, this morphactin did not significantly decrease the fresh and dry weight s of plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–421 t0 “TOURNESOL ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in maize dry weight was comparable with the decrease in plant height and leaf area.
Outcomedecrease in dry weight e1 Directionno_change inferred e1 Comparatorplant height and leaf area e1 Verbatim
t0 “Maize(Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 e1 “the decrease in dry weight was comparable with plant height and leaf area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1352 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Root dry weight of chilling-tolerant maize hybrids did not decrease .
Materialmaize hybrids with chilling tolerance e0 Outcomedry weight of root e0 Directiondidn't decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The results show that the dry weight of root of maize hybrids with chilling tolerance didn't decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–469 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease maize fresh or dry weight .
Treatment>95% relative humidity e1 Outcomegrowth (fresh weight and dry weight) e0 Directionneither a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 2 mM Al, citric acid did not significantly decrease dry weight .
Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Citric acid increased fresh weight by 8%, had no significant decrease on dry weight , but significantly decrease d chlorophyll content by 16% (Al2 CA5 vs. Al2 CA0) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–897 e1 “At 2 mM Al ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–581 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf Mn content of 2.80 mg/g did not decrease the dry weight of the older soybean leaves.
Organ / stageolder leaves e5 Directiondid not decrease e5 Verbatim
e0 “soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), cultivar ‘Maple Arrow’, to high manganese (Mn) supply under various growth conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–211 e5 “Leaf Mn content of 2.80 mg/g did not decrease the dry weight of the older leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–708 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Application of azoxystrobin did not significantly decrease soybean disease severity or improve total dry weight .
TreatmentApplication of azoxystrobin e4 Outcomedisease severity e4 Directiondid not significantly e4 Qualifieror improve total dry weight of the soybean plants e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e4 “Application of azoxystrobin did not significantly decrease disease severity or improve total dry weight of the soybean plants (P > 0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–735 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Al-gaimi root dry weight did not decrease under mild deficit.
TreatmentMild water deficit e0 Directionneither decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Mild water deficit affected Sindy-2 and Hab-Ahmar, while Al-gaimi was less affected with neither decrease in root dry weight nor change in dry weight . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–913 t0 “wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Stem plus leaf sheath weight in no-ear wheat did not decrease until maturation.
Organ / stagematuration stage e0 Outcomeweight of stem plus leaf sheath e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the weight of stem plus leaf sheath did not decrease until the maturation stage in the no-ear wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–691 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing fertilizer by 25% did not reduce soil nutrient availability or wheat nutrient content, height and dry weight .
Treatmentreducing fertilizer application by 25% e0 OutcomeN/P/K content, plant height, and dry weight of wheat e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “reducing fertilizer application by 25% did not decrease the available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in the soil and N/P/K content, plant height, and dry weight of wheat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1624 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced soil water did not affect root or aboveground dry weight .
Treatmentmoderate reduction of soil water content e0 Outcomeroot and above ground dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The moderate reduction of soil water content induced a decrease in predawn leaf water potential and leaf gas exchange; however, root and above ground dry weight were not affected. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–700 t0 “apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fine root dry weight of the G935 tree was insensitive to drought.
OutcomeFine root (<2 mm diameter) dry weight e1 Verbatim
e0 “we assessed the drought tolerance of 1-year-old apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) trees exposed to extreme water stress, focusing on growth and physiological responses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–179 e1 “Fine root (<2 mm diameter) dry weight showed the greatest decrease in the CG5087 tree ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1267 e2 “whereas the G935 tree was insensitive ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1306 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
SADH spraying did not change the total dry weight of young apple trees within at least four weeks after application.
Treatment2 000 ppm of SADH e0 Outcometotal dry weight of the plants e2 QualifierWithin at least four weeks after the application e2 Comparatorunsprayed controls e2 Verbatim
e0 “Spraying young apple trees with 2 000 ppm of SADH resulted in a rapid decrease in the elongation growth of the apical meristem ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–133 e2 “Within at least four weeks after the application no difference was observed in the total dry weight of the plants compared to unsprayed controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–279 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in potato.
Treatmentsupplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation e0 Directionnot significantly decreased e0 Comparatorcontrol plants that received only solar UV-B radiation e0 Verbatim
e0 “The dry weight s of all 4 species and pea and wheat plant height were not significantly decrease d by a supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation from cellulose acetate filtered FS-40 sunlamps for 6 hours each day, relative to control plants that received only solar UV-B radiation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1138 e1 “potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–147 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Harvest index was an exception to the decrease under higher soil salinity.
Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The increase in soil salinity caused to decrease in all parameters (total fresh tuber yield, tuber number, tuber dry weight , weight of potato classified as Grade A, biomass and leaf area) except harvest index ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1345 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Shepody root dry weight did not respond to PsJN inoculation.
Interactorstrain PsJN e1 other Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Inoculated plantlets of cultivars Norchip, Kennebec, Shepody, and Chaleur showed, in root dry weight , a five- to eight-fold increase, two- to three-fold increase, no response, and a decrease of 50%, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–832 e1 “growth promotion of potatoes by strain PsJN was cultivar specific ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–618 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Tomato fresh/ dry weight ratio did not change under NaCl.
Outcomefresh/dry weight ratio e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the stomatal conductance in cucumbers was reduced, accompanied by a decrease of the fresh/ dry weight ratio in the roots. Conversely, neither of those parameters changed in tomatoes. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1165 e1 “NaCl 60 mM ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–521 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Tomato dry weight was unchanged across light-dark cycles.
Treatmentvarying light–dark cycles e0 Outcometotal dry weight e0 Directionremained unchanged e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Total dry weight showed different behaviors in both species, since in tomato the total dry weight remained unchanged under varying light–dark cycles, whereas in cucumber seedlings there was a clear decrease compared to the control treatment. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–754 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Ca, Mg and K concentrations of tomato fruit were the same under both treatments on a dry weight basis.
Treatmentdeficit irrigation (DI) e0 OutcomeFruit concentrations of Ca, Mg, and K e2 Qualifieron a dry weight basis e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In glasshouse-grown tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. `Virosa'), deficit irrigation (DI), in which plant water potential was allowed to decrease from –0.5 to –1.2 MPa, reduced plant growth and fruit yield, size and count, and caused blossom-end rot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 e2 “Fruit concentrations of Ca, Mg, and K were the same for both treatments on a dry weight basis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–517 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The growth regulator treatments did not significantly decrease dry weight per stem.
Treatmentmepiquat chloride and ethephon e6 Directiondid not decrease significantly e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “six cultivars of winter barley grown in Belfast, UK, in 1986/87 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–266 e5 “The growth regulator treatments reduced plant height and although dry weight /stem did not decrease significantly, dry weight /unit length of stem was similar in treated and untreated plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1126 e6 “Applications of nitrogen and a plant growth regulator (mepiquat chloride and ethephon) were used to manipulate stem structure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–133 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry root weight did not decrease in Tarm-92 after seven days of boron stress.
Treatment7 days of B stress e1 Directionsuch a decrease was not observed e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “While the dry root weight of B?lb?l-89 was reduced after 7 days of B stress (p < 0.05), such a decrease was not observed in Tarm-92. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1060 t0 “Boron toxicity tolerance in barley may be related to intrinsically higher levels of reactive oxygen species in the shoots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Slight drought caused no statistically significant decline in shoot dry weight .
Treatmentslight drought e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Hordeum vulgare L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–42 e0 “No statistically significant decrease in shoot dry weigh was detected after slight drought ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–988 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Root fresh and dry weight did not significantly decrease after initial salt stress.
Outcomefresh and dry weight in root e0 Directiondid not significantly reduce e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “fresh and dry weight in root did not significantly reduce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–517 e1 “initial stage of salt stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–449 e2 “Rice (Oryza sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–88 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Root K+ content fell rapidly after salt stress began. Intervention effect Root Na+ content rose rapidly after salt stress began. Intervention effect At 3 h of salt treatment, 1,292 genes were upregulated against control. Intervention effect At 24 h of salt treatment, 453 genes were upregulated against control. Intervention effect At 72 h of salt treatment, 486 genes were upregulated against control. Intervention effect At 3 h of salt treatment, 939 genes were downregulated against control. Intervention effect At 24 h of salt treatment, 894 genes were downregulated against control. Intervention effect At 72 h of salt treatment, 646 genes were downregulated against control. Observation More genes were differentially expressed at 3 h than at 24 or 72 h. Association Salt response genes were related to kinase and calcium binding, hormone signaling, transcription, metabolism, antioxidants and ion transport. Observation Many salt response genes were activated at 3 h. Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Adding Almix to butachlor did not significantly decrease weed dry weight compared with butachlor alone.
TreatmentButachlor and Almix as tank mixture e0 Outcomedry weight of weeds e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Comparatoralone application of butachlor at corresponding dose e0 Verbatim
e0 “Butachlor and Almix as tank mixture did not significantly decrease the dry weight of weeds over the alone application of butachlor at corresponding dose ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–738 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity up to 4 dS m- 1 did not affect germination rate decrease or single seedling dry weight .
Treatmentirrigation water salinity e0 Outcomegermination rate decrease and the single seedling dry weight e0 Directionhad not affected e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The irrigation water salinity had not affected up to 4 dS m- 1 in terms of the germination rate decrease and the single seedling dry weight of rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–877 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 125 mg/kg Cd, root dry weight decrease d by 5.29% with no significant decrease compared with control.
Outcomedry weight of root e3 Verbatim
e3 “When the Cd treatment concentration was up to 125 mg kg−1, the dry weight of root and shoots biomass and PN in the plant decrease d by 5.29%, 1.94% and 2.06%, and they had no significant decrease compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–969 t0 “Lonicera japonica Thunb. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–143 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 125 mg/kg Cd, PN decrease d by 2.06% with no significant decrease compared with control.
Verbatim
e3 “When the Cd treatment concentration was up to 125 mg kg−1, the dry weight of root and shoots biomass and PN in the plant decrease d by 5.29%, 1.94% and 2.06%, and they had no significant decrease compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–969 t0 “Lonicera japonica Thunb. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–143 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 125 mg/kg Cd, shoot biomass decrease d by 1.94% with no significant decrease compared with control.
Verbatim
e3 “When the Cd treatment concentration was up to 125 mg kg−1, the dry weight of root and shoots biomass and PN in the plant decrease d by 5.29%, 1.94% and 2.06%, and they had no significant decrease compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–969 t0 “Lonicera japonica Thunb. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–143 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.