View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
Method / resource observed review summary measured Claim · model-written summary
Tractor-operated garlic planters reached a miss index as low as 2.67%.
Verbatim
e0 “The mechanization of garlic production has been developed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 e2 “with miss indices as low as 2.67% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–590 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The developed garlic clove planter had a miss index of 3.64 %.
tractor operated garlic clove planter e0 Verbatim
t0 “garlic (Allium sativum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–35 e0 “tractor operated garlic clove planter was developed having miss index , multiple index , quality of feed index , mechanical clove damage, effective field capacity and field efficiency is 3.64 %, 5.64 %, 90.72 %, 5.70 %, 0.32 ha/h and 79.02 %, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–809 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
GG-5 miss index was 4.58 %.
Verbatim
e0 “The average seed spacing, miss index , multiple index , quality of feed index , seed rate and seed metering efficiency for GG-4 and GG-5 garlic varieties were 99.4 mm, 6.12 %, 7.91 %, 85.96 %, 377 kg.ha-1; and 96.35 % and 99.9 mm, 4.58 %, 6.07 %, 89.34 %, 443 kg.ha-1, and 96.75 %, respectively during field tests. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–732 Other claims from this paper (19)
not stated 31 Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The planter had a lower miss index and multiple index .
miss index and multiple index e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “lower miss index and multiple index were also recorded. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1322 t0 “vegetables ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–57 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cane diameter increased miss index .
cane diameter e0 Verbatim
e0 “cane diameter varies directly with miss index ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1273 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–52 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At optimal speed, the planter miss index was 20.8%.
Verbatim
e0 “miss index of 20.8%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1553 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–52 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Minimum seedling miss index of the cotton transplanter was 1.7%.
seedling miss index e3 Verbatim
e3 “While minimum of seedling miss index , seedling multiple index and quality of feed index were 1.7%, 1.3% and 89.9% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1347 e5 “cotton variety G86 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–125 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Predicted miss index was 6.76 percent.
Verbatim
e0 “The predicted responses of miss index , multiple index and precision index were 6.76, 3.89 and 10.81 percent, respectively with combined desirability of 0.88 for the SMM3 model. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1307 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cotton miss index was 15.6% at 0.5 m s-1.
Verbatim
e0 “The quality of feed index for cotton seeds was found to be 84.4 and88.9% while the miss index contributed to the rest of the seed spacingdistribution of 15.6 and 11.1 % at forward speeds of 0.5 and 1.5 ms-1,respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1986 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Miss index rose 11.62% for one planter.
miss index (MISS) e0 Verbatim
e0 “increase in the miss index ( MISS ) by 11.62% and 9.70% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–665 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 Other claims from this paper (13) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Miss index rose 9.70% for the other planter.
miss index (MISS) e0 Verbatim
e0 “increase in the miss index ( MISS ) by 11.62% and 9.70% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–665 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 Other claims from this paper (13) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At optimal settings the miss index was 0.93%.
Verbatim
e0 “Under these conditions, the quality of feed index reaches 95.20%, the multi- index is 3.87%, and the miss index is 0.93%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1267 t0 “design of the maize metering device involves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–62 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 0.39 m/s, miss index was lowest.
not always significant e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “no-tillage corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–45 e1 “The multiples index and miss index , not always significant, as complementary of quality of feed index , were the lowest at 0.39 m/s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1217 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing tray speed reduced the miss -seeding index to 6.81% at 65r/min.
miss-seeding index e2 increasing seed metering tray speed e0 Verbatim
e0 “the reseeding index , the miss -seeding index and the coefficient of variation can be effectively reduced with increasing seed metering tray speed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1018 e1 “corn seeds in the seeding process ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–543 e2 “the miss -seeding index decreased from 10.59 to 6.81% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1208 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Aerial imagery overestimated miss index .
Aerial imagery data source e0 Verbatim
e0 “Aerial imagery data source underestimated quality of feed and precision indices, overestimated miss index ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1251 t0 “Drone Imagery for Monitoring Performance of a Modified Drill ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–75 e1 “no-till corn planter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–52 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Average miss index was 5.3%.
Verbatim
e0 “The average miss index , multiple index and plant population/m2 for two varieties was found to be only 5.3%, 8.2% and 68 plant/m2, respectively, which was within acceptable limit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1304 t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
With seed disturbance structure II at 60 rpm and 2.4 kPa, the miss index was 1.94%.
seed disturbance structure II e2 Verbatim
t0 “the Double-Hole Rice Vacuum Seed Meter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–124 e2 “At a speed of 60 rpm and vacuum pressures of 2.0 kPa, 2.4 kPa, and 2.8 kPa, the qualities of feed index of seed disturbance structure II were 90%, 91.11%, and 89.17%, respectively, and the miss index es were 2.96%, 1.94%, and 1.57%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1649 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect The shaped-hole seed meter had significantly higher planting precision than the meter without a shaped hole. Method / resource Shaped hole B was the optimum shaped-hole structure for the seed meter. Intervention effect Seed disturbance structure II gave better planting precision than the other disturbance structures. Observation With seed disturbance structure II at 60 rpm and 2.0 kPa, the feed index quality was 90%. Observation With seed disturbance structure II at 60 rpm and 2.4 kPa, the feed index quality was 91.11%. Observation With seed disturbance structure II at 60 rpm and 2.8 kPa, the feed index quality was 89.17%. Observation With seed disturbance structure II at 60 rpm and 2.0 kPa, the miss index was 2.96%. Observation With seed disturbance structure II at 60 rpm and 2.8 kPa, the miss index was 1.57%. Intervention effect At high rotational speeds, seed disturbance gave better rice bunch planting precision than no disturbance structure. Intervention effect In simulation, the seed velocity and total force magnitude were lower in the meter without disturbance structures than with the disturbed structure. Observation In simulation, seed disturbance breaks up the stacked state of seeds. Mechanism Seed disturbance improves seed mobility, which enhances the precision of bunch planting. Mechanism The shaped hole holds the seed in a stable suction posture, which helps increase the seed-filling rate. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
With seed disturbance structure II at 60 rpm and 2.8 kPa, the miss index was 1.57%.
seed disturbance structure II e2 Verbatim
t0 “the Double-Hole Rice Vacuum Seed Meter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–124 e2 “At a speed of 60 rpm and vacuum pressures of 2.0 kPa, 2.4 kPa, and 2.8 kPa, the qualities of feed index of seed disturbance structure II were 90%, 91.11%, and 89.17%, respectively, and the miss index es were 2.96%, 1.94%, and 1.57%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1649 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect The shaped-hole seed meter had significantly higher planting precision than the meter without a shaped hole. Method / resource Shaped hole B was the optimum shaped-hole structure for the seed meter. Intervention effect Seed disturbance structure II gave better planting precision than the other disturbance structures. Observation With seed disturbance structure II at 60 rpm and 2.0 kPa, the feed index quality was 90%. Observation With seed disturbance structure II at 60 rpm and 2.4 kPa, the feed index quality was 91.11%. Observation With seed disturbance structure II at 60 rpm and 2.8 kPa, the feed index quality was 89.17%. Observation With seed disturbance structure II at 60 rpm and 2.0 kPa, the miss index was 2.96%. Observation With seed disturbance structure II at 60 rpm and 2.4 kPa, the miss index was 1.94%. Intervention effect At high rotational speeds, seed disturbance gave better rice bunch planting precision than no disturbance structure. Intervention effect In simulation, the seed velocity and total force magnitude were lower in the meter without disturbance structures than with the disturbed structure. Observation In simulation, seed disturbance breaks up the stacked state of seeds. Mechanism Seed disturbance improves seed mobility, which enhances the precision of bunch planting. Mechanism The shaped hole holds the seed in a stable suction posture, which helps increase the seed-filling rate. Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Belt type significantly affected miss index at P<0.01.
Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The results indicated significant differences between miss index (P<0.01), multiple index (P<0.05), and mean (P<0.05) as affected by belt type. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3079–3222 t0 “onion ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 Other claims from this paper (13) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Onion planter miss index was 5.09%.
3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves e0 lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipur e0 Verbatim
e0 “The existing onion seed planter was tested in lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipur and the seed rate, quality of feed index , multiple index , miss index , seed to seed spacing and theoretical seeding rate was found to be 9.67 kg ha-1 at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 88.80% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 5.24% at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 5.09% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 7.49 cm at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate gr… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–448 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Belt type significantly affected multiple index at P<0.05.
Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The results indicated significant differences between miss index (P<0.01), multiple index (P<0.05), and mean (P<0.05) as affected by belt type. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3079–3222 t0 “onion ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 Other claims from this paper (13) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Miss Index varied between 0-12.5%.
Verbatim
t0 “Groundnut Planter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 e0 “The Multiple Index and Miss Index varied between 2.5-12.5% and 0-12.5%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–834 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Speed, angle and cell size significantly affected Miss Index at the 1% confidence level.
speed, inclination angle and cell size e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Groundnut Planter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 e0 “The effects of speed, inclination angle and cell size on miss index was significant at 1% confidence level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1040 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Miss Index increased at higher forward speeds, larger cell sizes and greater inclination angles.
higher forward speeds, larger cell sizes, and greater inclination angles e0 Verbatim
t0 “Groundnut Planter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 e0 “The Multiple Index and Miss Index varied between 2.5-12.5% and 0-12.5%, respectively, and both increased with higher forward speeds, larger cell sizes, and greater inclination angles ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–932 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The T inverted treatment miss index was 10.5%, similar to the other tillers.
other tillers e0 Verbatim
e0 “its miss index (10.5%) has been around other tillers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1075 t0 “Evaluation of Planting Technical Indices In Modified Till Planter in Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The soybean plot seeder met superior-product standards for qualified, repeat, miss and variable seeding index es.
qualified index,repeat-seeding index,miss-seeding index and variable index e0 superior-product standard e0 Verbatim
e0 “qualified index ,repeat-seeding index , miss -seeding index and variable index of the seeder could reach the superior-product standard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–621 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–84 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The system estimated the miss index 0.4% relative to SIMP.
seeding image monitoring platform (SIMP) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Miss and multiples index estimated by this system were 0.4% and 0.5% than that of seeding image monitoring platform (SIMP), respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–946 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The planter miss index was 2.07%.
Verbatim
t0 “sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 e0 “miss index and multiple index , actual field capacity and field efficiency were found to be 101 mm, 2.07%, 3.8%, 0.773 ha/h and 79.7%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–914 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The planter had mean miss index of 2.01 per cent.
Verbatim
e0 “The average values for plant to plant spacing, mean miss index and multiple index , actual field capacity and field efficiency were 101.1 mm, 2.01 per cent, 3.8 per cent, 0.77 ha/h and 89 per cent, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–502 t0 “Sorghum
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The planter had multiple index of 3.8 per cent.
Verbatim
e0 “The average values for plant to plant spacing, mean miss index and multiple index , actual field capacity and field efficiency were 101.1 mm, 2.01 per cent, 3.8 per cent, 0.77 ha/h and 89 per cent, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–502 t0 “Sorghum
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Allium sativume0
Gossypium hirsutum
Zea mays
Zea mays subsp. mays
Oryza sativa
Allium cepa
Arachis hypogaea
Glycine max
Sorghum