Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“N use efficiency (NUE)”

3,005 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 900 non-evaluative

Over time

1970 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine

More filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion trial result: N use efficiency (NUE) was higher.

Taxon: OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment: drip systeme0
Outcome: N use efficiency (NUE)e0
Direction: highere0
Comparator: furrow systeme0

Verbatim

t0
“Onion”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25

e0
“Irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) and N use efficiency (NUE) were higher with the drip system than with the furrow system”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1237

Title

Nitrogen Effects on Onion Yield Under Drip and Furrow Irrigation

Ardell D. Halvorson; Michael E. Bartolo; Curtis A. Reule; et al. Agronomy Journal 2008. doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0377

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Onion trial result: water was less by 72%.
Intervention effect Onion trial result: water was less by 57%.
Intervention effect Onion trial result: Onion yields was greater.
Intervention effect Onion trial result: Total marketable fresh onion yield was increased.
Intervention effect Onion trial result: colossal and jumbo sized onions was more.
Intervention effect Onion trial result: medium sized onions was less.
Observation Onion trial result: Biomass production was accelerated.
Observation Onion trial result: N accumulation was accelerated.
Observation Onion trial result: total N accumulation was accelerated by 121 kg N ha −1.
Intervention effect Onion trial result: Irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) was higher.
Intervention effect Onion trial result: Residual soil NO 3 –N levels was greater.
Intervention effect Onion trial result: soil NO 3 –N levels was similar.
Intervention effect Onion trial result: Adjusted gross economic returns was greater.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wheat hybrid showed an improvement in N use efficiency (NUE).

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume5
Material: wheat hybride5
Outcome: N use efficiency (NUE)e6
Direction: improvemente6

Verbatim

e5
“The wheat hybrid reached a higher grain yield with fewer N inputs than the conventional genotype”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1350

e6
“it demonstrated an improvement in N use efficiency (NUE)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1412

Title

Field programs for the cultivation of barley and wheat hybrids

Mattia Scapino; Massimo Blandino Italian Journal of Agronomy 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ijagro.2025.100046

Other claims from this paper (14)

Association Barley hybrids yielded 8% more grain than conventional genotypes.
Association Wheat hybrids yielded 10% more grain than conventional genotypes.
Association Barley hybrids had 23% more kernels per ear than conventional genotypes.
Association Wheat hybrids had 22% more kernels per ear than conventional genotypes.
Association Barley hybrids had 3% higher kernel weight than conventional genotypes.
Association Wheat hybrids had 4% higher kernel weight than conventional genotypes.
Mechanism The authors attribute the yield advantage mainly to an improved tillering ability.
Association Hybrids were sown at a 67% lower initial plant density.
Observation The canopy of the hybrids stayed green for longer.
Observation The hybrids improved biomass accumulation, as the authors interpret the longer green canopy.
Intervention effect The wheat hybrid reached a higher grain yield with fewer N inputs than the conventional genotype.
Association The barley hybrid showed a higher yield potential.
Association The barley hybrid showed improved tolerance to foliar diseases.
Recommendation The authors recommend hybrids for a sustainable intensification of cereal cropping systems.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) reached or changed as reported under 75 kg N ha^{-1}.

Taxon: maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse1
Treatment: 75 kg N ha^{-1}e0
Outcome: Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE)e0
Direction: optimume0

Not reportedComparatorSettingValue

Verbatim

e0
“Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) was optimum at 75 kg N ha^{-1} during both seasons”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1445

e1
“maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–105

Title

Optimizing water and nitrogen use for maize production under semiarid conditions

HAFIZ MOHKUM HAMMAD; ASHFAQ AHMAD; FARHAT ABBAS; et al. TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 2012. doi:10.3906/tar-1111-24

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect photosynthesis reached or changed as reported under 225 kg ha^{-1}.
Intervention effect transpiration reached or changed as reported under 225 kg ha^{-1}.
Intervention effect leaf area index reached or changed as reported under 225 kg ha^{-1}.
Intervention effect grain yield reached or changed as reported under 225 kg ha^{-1}.
Intervention effect crop growth rate reached or changed as reported under 300 kg N ha^{-1}.
Intervention effect biological yield reached or changed as reported under 300 kg N ha^{-1}.
Intervention effect water use efficiency (WUE) reached or changed as reported under 225 kg N ha^{-1}.
Intervention effect grain yield reached or changed as reported under Water stress.
Intervention effect grain yield reached or changed as reported under Water stress.
Intervention effect Water and nitrogen treatments significantly affected crop growth and development.
Intervention effect For semiarid Pakistan, 525 mm water with 225 kg N per hectare gave optimum irrigated maize production.
Recommendation The authors proposed 525 mm water with 225 kg N per hectare as best management practice for comparable regions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The AI1 alternate irrigation treatment did not significantly decline tomato yield, total N uptake (TNU) or N use efficiency (NUE).

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: AI1e0
Outcome: yield, total N uptake (TNU) and N use efficiency (NUE)e0
Direction: did not declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“AI1 did not decline yield, total N uptake (TNU) and N use efficiency (NUE) significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1288

t0
“tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116

Title

Influences of alternate partial root-zone irrigation and urea rate on water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies in tomato

Liu Xiaogang; Li Fusheng; Zhang Fucang; et al. International journal of agricultural and biological engineering 2017. doi:10.25165/j.ijabe.20171006.2541

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Compared with conventional irrigation, alternate partial root-zone irrigation decreased water consumption of tomato by 16.0%-33.1%.
Intervention effect Compared with conventional irrigation, alternate partial root-zone irrigation increased water use efficiency of yield (WUEy) of tomato by 6.7%-11.9%.
Intervention effect Compared with conventional irrigation, alternate partial root-zone irrigation increased water use efficiency of dry mass (WUEd) of tomato by 10.2%-15.9%.
Intervention effect Compared with the low urea rate (NL), the middle urea rate (NM) enhanced tomato yield by 28.5%.
Intervention effect Compared with NL, NM enhanced tomato total N uptake (TNU) by 35.3%.
Intervention effect Compared with NL, NM enhanced tomato WUEy by 22.6%.
Intervention effect Compared with NL, NM enhanced tomato WUEd by 16.3%.
Intervention effect Compared with CINL, AI1NM reduced tomato water consumption by 12.5%.
Intervention effect Compared with CINL, AI1NM increased tomato yield by 35.5%.
Intervention effect Compared with CINL, AI1NM increased tomato total N uptake (TNU) by 58.4%.
Intervention effect Compared with CINL, AI1NM increased tomato WUEy by 54.4%.
Intervention effect Compared with CINL, AI1NM increased tomato WUEd by 53.7%.
Recommendation The authors conclude that AI1 can improve water use efficiency and total N uptake of tomato simultaneously at a medium urea rate.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DE1 increased wheat N use efficiency (NUE) by 26.5 % relative to CN.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment: DE1 treatmente2
Outcome: wheat N use efficiency (NUE)e2
Direction: increasede2
Value: 26.5 %e2
Comparator: CNe2

Verbatim

e2
“Compared with CN, DE1 treatment increased maize yield by 10.0 %, wheat N use efficiency (NUE) by 26.5 %”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–820

Title

Optimizing application of dairy effluent with synthetic N fertilizer reduced nitrogen leaching in clay loam soil

Obemah David Nartey; Deyan Liu; Jiafa Luo; et al. Heliyon 2024. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33900

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect DE1 increased maize yield by 10.0 % relative to CN.
Intervention effect DE1 increased wheat and maize N uptake by 7.7–16.3 % relative to CN.
Intervention effect DE1 reduced wheat-season N leaching by 22.4 % relative to CN.
Intervention effect DE1 reduced maize-season N leaching by 40.4 % relative to CN.
Recommendation Replacing 50 % and 25 % of synthetic N with dairy farm effluent and manure could reduce N leaching but had varied effects on crop productivity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N from 0 to 180 kg N/ha significantly decreased energy-use efficiency and NUE.

Treatment: 0 to 180 kg N/hae0
Outcome: energy-use efficiency and NUEe0
Direction: decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“energy-use efficiency and NUE, which were decreased significantly from 0 to 180 kg N/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1713

Title

Effect of sequential tillage practices and N levels on energy relations and use- efficiencies of irrigation water and N in maize (Zea mays)wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system

R.L. CHOUDHARY; U.K. BEHERA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v58i1.4163

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Zero tillage saved 20% input energy in maize relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Zero tillage saved 15% input energy in wheat relative to conventional tillage.
Observation CTCT had the maximum input energy requirement in the maize–wheat system.
Observation ZTZT had the minimum input energy requirement in the maize–wheat system.
Intervention effect Sequential tillage did not significantly alter gross and net output energy production.
Intervention effect ZTZT had significantly maximum energy-use efficiency, exceeding CTCT by 29.76%.
Intervention effect ZTZT energy-use efficiency exceeded CTZT by 19.44%.
Intervention effect ZTZT energy-use efficiency exceeded ZTCT by 11.49%.
Intervention effect Wheat zero-tillage sequences increased irrigation water-use efficiency by 46% relative to conventional-tillage wheat sequences.
Intervention effect Increasing N from 0 to 120 kg N/ha significantly increased input and output energy and IWUE.
Recommendation The authors recommend zero tillage with 120 kg N/ha to enhance resource-use efficiency.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Loam soil gave highest N use efficiency (NUE)

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: N use efficiency (NUE)e0
Direction: higheste0
Setting: loam soile0

Verbatim

e0
“Cultivars grown on loam soil had the highest preand post-anthesis N accumulation (NA) of total plant, leaves, stems and grains, as well as nitrogen remobilization to grain (NR), grain yield and N use efficiency (NUE).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1355

t0
“winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–92

Title

Research on nitrogen metabolism characteristics and use efficiency in different winter wheat cultivars grown on three soil textures

Xiong Shu Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 2013

Other claims from this paper (19)

Association GS activity and free amino acids had inverted V patterns with soil-dependent peak timing
Association The peak on sandy soil was 10 days earlier than on loam and clay soils
Observation GS activity and free amino acids were not detected on sandy soil on May 22
Association Loam soil gave highest preand post-anthesis N accumulation (NA) of total plant, leaves, stems and grains
Association Loam soil gave highest nitrogen remobilization to grain (NR)
Association Loam soil gave highest grain yield
Association Sandy soil gave highest N remobilization efficiency (NRE)
Association Sandy soil gave highest contribution of N remobilized to grain nitrogen (NRC)
Association Sandy soil gave highest N harvest index (NHI)
Association Sandy soil gave highest N physiological efficiency (NPE)
Observation NRC on sandy soil was 82.46%-95.84%
Association NR was about seven-fold higher than post-anthesis NA on sandy soil
Observation Post-anthesis NA contribution was 36.6% on loam soil
Observation Post-anthesis NA contribution was 29.2% on clay soil
Association ZM366 was highest for GS activity, free amino acid content on sandy soil
Association ZM366 was highest for grain yield on sandy soil
Association ZM366 was highest for protein content, NUE and NPE on sandy soil
Observation ‘AK58’ was best on loam soil
Observation ‘ZM22’ was best on clay soil

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RPN significantly increased rate of contribution to grain,N use efficiency(NUE),agronomic N use efficiency(ANUE) in spring maize.

Taxon: spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: RPNe1
Outcome: rate of contribution to grain,N use efficiency(NUE),agronomic N use efficiency(ANUE)e1
Direction: increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“spring maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–113

e1
“In addition to these,the harvest index(HI),dry matter,nitrogen translocation and its rate,rate of contribution to grain,N use efficiency(NUE),agronomic N use efficiency(ANUE),N uptake efficiency(NUPE),N partial factor productivity(PFP) and N harvest index(NHI) were increased significantly(P0.05) under RPN and SBN treatments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1346

Title

Effects of nitrogen fertilization methods on yield,profit and nitrogen absorption and utilization of spring maize

Bing Ye Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science 2011

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Reducing and postponing N application increased spring maize yield by 3.91% over farmers practice.
Intervention effect Reducing and postponing N application increased spring maize profit by 592 Yuan/ha over farmers practice.
Intervention effect Single basal nitrogen application increased spring maize yield by 11.48% over farmers practice.
Intervention effect Single basal nitrogen application increased spring maize profit by 2032 Yuan/ha over farmers practice.
Intervention effect Single basal nitrogen application had the best yield and profit among the treatments.
Intervention effect RPN significantly increased harvest index(HI),dry matter,nitrogen translocation and its rate in spring maize.
Intervention effect SBN significantly increased harvest index(HI),dry matter,nitrogen translocation and its rate in spring maize.
Intervention effect SBN significantly increased rate of contribution to grain,N use efficiency(NUE),agronomic N use efficiency(ANUE) in spring maize.
Intervention effect RPN significantly increased N uptake efficiency(NUPE),N partial factor productivity(PFP) and N harvest index(NHI) in spring maize.
Intervention effect SBN significantly increased N uptake efficiency(NUPE),N partial factor productivity(PFP) and N harvest index(NHI) in spring maize.
Intervention effect Post-anthesis dry matter, N accumulation and their ratios to the total were highest under N240/3.
Intervention effect Post-anthesis dry matter and N accumulation were higher under N240/1.
Intervention effect The ratios of post-anthesis dry matter and N accumulation to the total were lower under N240/1.
Intervention effect Post-anthesis dry matter and N accumulation were lower under N280/2.
Intervention effect The ratios of post-anthesis dry matter and N accumulation to the total were higher under N280/2.
Recommendation The authors could not conclude that single basal nitrogen application can replace farmers practice.
Recommendation The authors recommend reducing and postponing N application as a scientific nitrogen fertilizer method.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SBN significantly increased rate of contribution to grain,N use efficiency(NUE),agronomic N use efficiency(ANUE) in spring maize.

Taxon: spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: SBNe1
Outcome: rate of contribution to grain,N use efficiency(NUE),agronomic N use efficiency(ANUE)e1
Direction: increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“spring maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–113

e1
“In addition to these,the harvest index(HI),dry matter,nitrogen translocation and its rate,rate of contribution to grain,N use efficiency(NUE),agronomic N use efficiency(ANUE),N uptake efficiency(NUPE),N partial factor productivity(PFP) and N harvest index(NHI) were increased significantly(P0.05) under RPN and SBN treatments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1346

Title

Effects of nitrogen fertilization methods on yield,profit and nitrogen absorption and utilization of spring maize

Bing Ye Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science 2011

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Reducing and postponing N application increased spring maize yield by 3.91% over farmers practice.
Intervention effect Reducing and postponing N application increased spring maize profit by 592 Yuan/ha over farmers practice.
Intervention effect Single basal nitrogen application increased spring maize yield by 11.48% over farmers practice.
Intervention effect Single basal nitrogen application increased spring maize profit by 2032 Yuan/ha over farmers practice.
Intervention effect Single basal nitrogen application had the best yield and profit among the treatments.
Intervention effect RPN significantly increased harvest index(HI),dry matter,nitrogen translocation and its rate in spring maize.
Intervention effect SBN significantly increased harvest index(HI),dry matter,nitrogen translocation and its rate in spring maize.
Intervention effect RPN significantly increased rate of contribution to grain,N use efficiency(NUE),agronomic N use efficiency(ANUE) in spring maize.
Intervention effect RPN significantly increased N uptake efficiency(NUPE),N partial factor productivity(PFP) and N harvest index(NHI) in spring maize.
Intervention effect SBN significantly increased N uptake efficiency(NUPE),N partial factor productivity(PFP) and N harvest index(NHI) in spring maize.
Intervention effect Post-anthesis dry matter, N accumulation and their ratios to the total were highest under N240/3.
Intervention effect Post-anthesis dry matter and N accumulation were higher under N240/1.
Intervention effect The ratios of post-anthesis dry matter and N accumulation to the total were lower under N240/1.
Intervention effect Post-anthesis dry matter and N accumulation were lower under N280/2.
Intervention effect The ratios of post-anthesis dry matter and N accumulation to the total were higher under N280/2.
Recommendation The authors could not conclude that single basal nitrogen application can replace farmers practice.
Recommendation The authors recommend reducing and postponing N application as a scientific nitrogen fertilizer method.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant N use efficiency was higher toward the poles.

Taxon: plante1
Outcome: NUEe0
Direction: highere0
Setting: the polese0

Verbatim

e0
“NUE higher towards the poles”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1189

e1
“plant nitrogen (N) uptake (Nup) and N use efficiency (NUE)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–199

Title

Nitrogen deposition and climate drive plant nitrogen uptake while soil factors drive nitrogen use efficiency in terrestrial ecosystems

Helena Vallicrosa; Katrin Fleischer; Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; et al. Earth System Dynamics 2025. doi:10.5194/esd-16-1183-2025

Other claims from this paper (12)

Association Plant N uptake was primarily driven by N deposition.
Association Plant N uptake increased in warmer areas.
Association Plant N uptake increased in wetter areas.
Association Nitrogen use efficiency was driven by soil biotic and abiotic factors.
Association Plant nitrogen use efficiency decreased with greater arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization.
Association Plant nitrogen use efficiency increased with soil pH.
Association Plant nitrogen use efficiency increased with soil microbial stocks.
Association Plant N uptake was higher at tropical latitudes.
Association Total soil N stocks did not drive plant nitrogen uptake.
Association Total soil N stocks did not drive plant nitrogen use efficiency.
Method / resource TRENDY models may overestimate tropical plant N uptake by about 100 Tg N yr−1.
Method / resource TRENDY models may triple the standard deviation of plant N uptake at boreal latitudes.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“N use efficiency (NUE)”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics