View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis of plants grown at high CO2 and high light intensity had typical response curves to internal CO2 concentration with saturation at high CO2 .
Treatmenthigh CO2 and high light intensity e0 Outcometypical response curves to internal CO2 concentration with saturation at high CO2 e0 Verbatim
e0 “Photosynthesis by plants grown at high CO2 and high light intensity had typical response curves to internal CO2 concentration with saturation at high CO2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–924 t0 “Water Hyacinth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–78 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
High temperature increased the photosynthetic response to CO2 enrichment at high CO2 concentration.
TreatmentHigh temperature e0 Outcomenet photosynthetic response to CO 2 enrichment e0 Qualifierhigh CO 2 concentrations e0 Verbatim
e0 “High temperature increased net photosynthetic response to CO 2 enrichment at high CO 2 concentrations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1608 t0 “Soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–96 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Whole plant NUE showed no consistent response to elevated CO2 when plants received high N.
Directionno consistent response e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Whole plant NUE showed no consistent response to elevated CO2 when plants were supplied high N ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1679–1773 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Productivity under elevated CO2 was more sensitive, a negative response , to high temperature stress than under ambient CO2 .
Treatmenthigh temperature stress e2 Directionnegative response e2 Qualifierelevated [CO2 ] e2 Comparatorambient [CO2 ] e2 Verbatim
t0 “Evidence for divergence of response in Indica, Japonica, and wild rice to high CO2 × temperature interaction ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 e2 “the productivity of plants grown under elevated [ CO2 ] was more sensitive (negative response ) to high temperature stress compared with that of plants grown under ambient [ CO2 ] across this diversity panel ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1357 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed review summary positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Low nitrogen does not prevent a growth response to high CO2 .
Directiongrowth response e0 Verbatim
e0 “Low nitrogen does not preclude a growth response to high CO2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–358 t0 “Plant Nutrition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 e2 “biomass production of C3 species in both natural and managed ecosystems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–131 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The relative growth response to high CO2 was significantly greater in variegated plants than in completely green plants
Outcomerelative growth response e1 Directionsignificantly greater e1 Comparatorcompletely green plants e1 Verbatim
e1 “The relative growth response to high CO2 was significantly greater for the variegated plants compared to the completely green plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1839 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
High VPD accelerated stomatal response to CO2 .
Outcomestomatal response to [CO2] e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “high VPD significantly decreased relative stomatal closure in response to [ CO2 ] rise, but simultaneously accelerated stomatal response to [ CO2 ], as revealed by shorter half life (t1/2). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1141 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 Other claims from this paper (6) Association hypothesis review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The review states that the response of terrestrial ecosystems to elevated CO2 may generally be smaller at low than at high soil N supply.
Outcomeresponse to elevated CO2 e1 Comparatorhigh soil N supply e1 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e1 “response to elevated CO2 may generally be smaller at low relative to high soil N supply ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–326 Mechanism observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Molecular characterization of two cnr mutants identified two different mechanisms by which Arabidopsis minimizes the stress response to high CO2 .
Materialtwo cnr mutants e4 Outcomestress response to high level of CO2 e4 Qualifiertwo different mechanisms e4 Verbatim
t0 “high CO2 responsive mutants of Arabidopsis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–56 e4 “Molecular characterization of two cnr mutants isolated from T-DNA tagged populations has identified two different mechanisms by which Arabidopsis is able to minimize a stress response to high level of CO2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1299 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Thermal screening selected EMS plants without the characteristic high CO2 response .
Outcomeplants that did not show the characteristic response to high CO2 e0 Verbatim
t0 “Arabidopsis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–78 e0 “We screened around 18,000 EMS plants and plants that did not show the characteristic response to high CO2 were selected and seed collected. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–941 Other claims from this paper (1) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.