Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“selenium content in the grain”

220 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 74 non-evaluative

Over time

1970 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine

More filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium fertilization increased selenium content in grain.

Taxon: Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Selenium fertilizatione0
Outcome: selenium content in the graine0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Spring Wheat Grain”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–89

e0
“Selenium fertilization did not affect the grain yield; however, it increased the selenium content in the grain”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–427

Title

The Impact of Selenium Fertilization on the Quality Characteristics of Spring Wheat Grain

Aleksandra Radawiec; Beata Rutkowska; Justina Anna Tidaback; et al. Agronomy 2021. doi:10.3390/agronomy11112100

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Selenium fertilization did not affect grain yield.
Association Grain Se accumulation depended on fertilizer dose.
Association Grain Se accumulation depended on the growth stage of application.
Intervention effect Seed and soil application combined with foliar application at tillering and stem elongation was among the most effective fertilization methods.
Intervention effect Seed and soil application combined with foliar application at stem elongation alone was among the most effective fertilization methods.
Intervention effect Selenium fertilization affected the grain falling number.
Intervention effect Selenium fertilization affected total protein content.
Observation All grain quality parameters met the bread-making classification.
Recommendation The authors consider selenium fertilization a safe way to raise Se content and potentially improve grain technological and nutritional quality.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium significantly increased grain selenium content by 20% - 1880%.

Taxon: sweet corne0
Organ / stage: graine0
Treatment: seleniume0
Outcome: content of seleniume0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 20% - 1880%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“selenium could significantly increase the content of selenium in sweet corn grain and the increased range reached 20% - 1880%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–342

Title

Study on Cultivated Techniques of Sweet Corn with Selenium

Zhu Min Yumi kexue 2007

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Grain protein, oil and starch tended to increase with selenium.
Intervention effect Grain soluble sugar tended to increase.
Intervention effect Cane sugar content tended to increase.
Observation Yield components and biomass yield differed little among treatments.
Intervention effect Selenium significantly affected photosynthesis rate.
Intervention effect Chlorophyll content increased under selenium treatment.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain selenium application significantly increased selenium content in spring wheat grain.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Grain applicatione0
Outcome: selenium content in graine0
Direction: increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Grain application, soil application, and grain and soil application combined with foliar application at particular development stages of the plant significantly contributed to an increase in selenium content in grain.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–774

t0
“Spring Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87

Title

Agrotechnical Biofortification as a Method to Increase Selenium Content in Spring Wheat

Aleksandra Radawiec; Wiesław Szulc; Beata Rutkowska Agronomy 2021. doi:10.3390/agronomy11030541

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Selenium fertilization did not significantly change spring wheat grain yield.
Intervention effect Soil selenium application significantly increased selenium content in spring wheat grain.
Intervention effect Combined grain, soil, and foliar selenium application significantly increased selenium content in spring wheat grain.
Association Spring wheat selenium accumulation depended on fertilization type and timing.
Intervention effect Combined grain and soil fertilization with foliar application at tillering and stem elongation gave the highest spring wheat selenium content, 0.696 mg·kg−1 Se.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil selenium application significantly increased selenium content in spring wheat grain.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: soil applicatione0
Outcome: selenium content in graine0
Direction: increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Grain application, soil application, and grain and soil application combined with foliar application at particular development stages of the plant significantly contributed to an increase in selenium content in grain.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–774

t0
“Spring Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87

Title

Agrotechnical Biofortification as a Method to Increase Selenium Content in Spring Wheat

Aleksandra Radawiec; Wiesław Szulc; Beata Rutkowska Agronomy 2021. doi:10.3390/agronomy11030541

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Selenium fertilization did not significantly change spring wheat grain yield.
Intervention effect Grain selenium application significantly increased selenium content in spring wheat grain.
Intervention effect Combined grain, soil, and foliar selenium application significantly increased selenium content in spring wheat grain.
Association Spring wheat selenium accumulation depended on fertilization type and timing.
Intervention effect Combined grain and soil fertilization with foliar application at tillering and stem elongation gave the highest spring wheat selenium content, 0.696 mg·kg−1 Se.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain selenium content rose with selenium application concentration.

Taxon: Tartary buckwheate0
Treatment: selenium application concentratione0
Outcome: selenium content in Tartary buckwheat grainse0
Direction: increasede0

Verbatim

e0
“the selenium content in Tartary buckwheat grains was positively correlated with the selenium application concentration and increased with increasing selenium application concentration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1054

Title

Effects of selenium application concentration, period and method on the selenium content and grain yield of Tartary buckwheat of different varieties

Panfeng Liu; Lifang Song; Shuangnan Hao; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2022. doi:10.1002/jsfa.12048

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the selenium content in the grain of spelt wheat.

Taxon: spelt wheate0
Treatment: Selenium fertilisatione0
Outcome: content of this element in the graine0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the content of this element in the grain of spelt wheat and common wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–921

Title

Selenium (IV) and Sulphur (VI) as Elements Modifying Plant Quality: Content of Selenium and Sulphur Forms in Wheat

Marzena S. Brodowska; Magdalena Kurzyna-Szklarek; Mirosław Wyszkowski Molecules 2026. doi:10.3390/molecules31010160

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the selenium content in the grain of common wheat.
Intervention effect The concentration of selenium in wheat was also influenced by the timing of selenium application.
Intervention effect The dose of selenium and the timing of its application were not associated with significant changes in the content of both forms of sulphur in the tested plants.
Intervention effect The experimental factors used did not lead to selenium levels toxic to humans and animals.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence in the growth environment increased total sulphur, sulphate sulphur and organic sulphur contents in spelt wheat grain and straw.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence in the growth environment increased total sulphur, sulphate sulphur and organic sulphur contents in common wheat grain and straw.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased total sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 17%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased sulphate sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 29%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased organic sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 23%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased total sulphur content of common wheat straw by 26%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased sulphate sulphur content of common wheat straw by 18%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased organic sulphur content of common wheat straw by 57%.
Intervention effect The sulphur content in the plant growth environment was not associated with a change in the selenium content in the grain of the tested plants.
Recommendation The authors suggest the optimal selenium dose for biofortification is 20 mg Se ha-1 on clay soil, applied during the stem elongation phase of spelt and common wheat.
Recommendation The authors conclude that biofortification of wheat with selenium and sulphur is a good method of supplementing deficiencies of this element in the human diet.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the selenium content in the grain of common wheat.

Taxon: common wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: Selenium fertilisatione0
Outcome: content of this element in the graine0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the content of this element in the grain of spelt wheat and common wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–921

Title

Selenium (IV) and Sulphur (VI) as Elements Modifying Plant Quality: Content of Selenium and Sulphur Forms in Wheat

Marzena S. Brodowska; Magdalena Kurzyna-Szklarek; Mirosław Wyszkowski Molecules 2026. doi:10.3390/molecules31010160

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the selenium content in the grain of spelt wheat.
Intervention effect The concentration of selenium in wheat was also influenced by the timing of selenium application.
Intervention effect The dose of selenium and the timing of its application were not associated with significant changes in the content of both forms of sulphur in the tested plants.
Intervention effect The experimental factors used did not lead to selenium levels toxic to humans and animals.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence in the growth environment increased total sulphur, sulphate sulphur and organic sulphur contents in spelt wheat grain and straw.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence in the growth environment increased total sulphur, sulphate sulphur and organic sulphur contents in common wheat grain and straw.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased total sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 17%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased sulphate sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 29%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased organic sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 23%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased total sulphur content of common wheat straw by 26%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased sulphate sulphur content of common wheat straw by 18%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased organic sulphur content of common wheat straw by 57%.
Intervention effect The sulphur content in the plant growth environment was not associated with a change in the selenium content in the grain of the tested plants.
Recommendation The authors suggest the optimal selenium dose for biofortification is 20 mg Se ha-1 on clay soil, applied during the stem elongation phase of spelt and common wheat.
Recommendation The authors conclude that biofortification of wheat with selenium and sulphur is a good method of supplementing deficiencies of this element in the human diet.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined grain, soil, and foliar selenium application significantly increased selenium content in spring wheat grain.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: grain and soil application combined with foliar applicatione0
Outcome: selenium content in graine0
Direction: increasee0
Qualifier: at particular development stages of the plante0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Grain application, soil application, and grain and soil application combined with foliar application at particular development stages of the plant significantly contributed to an increase in selenium content in grain.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–774

t0
“Spring Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87

Title

Agrotechnical Biofortification as a Method to Increase Selenium Content in Spring Wheat

Aleksandra Radawiec; Wiesław Szulc; Beata Rutkowska Agronomy 2021. doi:10.3390/agronomy11030541

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Selenium fertilization did not significantly change spring wheat grain yield.
Intervention effect Grain selenium application significantly increased selenium content in spring wheat grain.
Intervention effect Soil selenium application significantly increased selenium content in spring wheat grain.
Association Spring wheat selenium accumulation depended on fertilization type and timing.
Intervention effect Combined grain and soil fertilization with foliar application at tillering and stem elongation gave the highest spring wheat selenium content, 0.696 mg·kg−1 Se.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium accumulation in chickpea grain was affected by native grain protein content.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Compound: proteine0
Outcome: degree of selenium accumulatione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“the degree of selenium accumulation is affected by the protein content in the native grain”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–361

e1
“chickpea grains”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1092

Title

Розробка технології борошна нуту збагаченого селеном

Biletska, Yana; Plotnikova, Raisa; Skyrda, Olena; et al. The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy 2020

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation In sprouted chickpea grain, 95...99 % of selenium accumulated in the cotyledon protein fraction.
Intervention effect Leucine content increased by 87% during chickpea grain germination.
Intervention effect Lysine content increased by 76% during chickpea grain germination.
Intervention effect Arginine content increased by 80% during chickpea grain germination.
Intervention effect Tryptophan content increased by 55% during chickpea grain germination.
Observation Aspartic and glutamic acids and their amides comprised 67% of non-sprouted and 70% of sprouted chickpea grain.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain selenium content increased markedly after spraying.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage: graine1
Treatment: sprayinge0
Outcome: selenium contente1
Direction: increases very remarkablye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“spraying in empress stage of wheat growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–92

e1
“The selenium content of the wheat grain increases very remarkably.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–233

Title

Early Report on the High Selenium Technique Study of the Strong Gluten Wheat

MA Yu-xia Journal of Henan Vocation-technical Teachers College 2004

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect Spraying at the empress stage had no obvious effect on yield components or yield.
Observation Strong gluten wheat absorbed more selenium than common wheat.
Observation Spraying at grain filling was better than spraying at boot stage.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“selenium content in the grain”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics