Claim · model-written summary
Tension wood had wider fibre-lumen diameter (32.24 µm) than normal wood.
Verbatim
e0“This study ascertained the physico-mechanical and anatomical properties of Terminalia superba tension wood, in comparison with its normal counterpart”
e5“fibre-lumen diameter (32.24 µm) and vessel diameter (156.80 µm) were wider for tension wood than for normal wood (29.34 and 147.93 µm, respectively)”
Title
C. Antwi-Boasiako; E.S. Ofosu; M. Glalah Wood Material Science and Engineering 2024. doi:10.1080/17480272.2024.2337149
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Tension wood had higher green moisture content (75 ± 2%) than normal wood.
- Observation Tension wood had lower basic density (562 ± 11 kg/m3) than normal wood.
- Observation Normal wood had a greater modulus of elasticity (11293 ± 227.5) than tension wood.
- Observation Normal wood had a greater modulus of rupture (106 ± 4.5) than tension wood.
- Observation Normal wood had greater compression parallel to grain (65 ± 1.8) than tension wood.
- Observation Normal wood had a greater double wall thickness (66 µm) than tension wood.
- Observation Normal wood had a greater fibre diameter (37 µm) than tension wood.
- Observation Normal wood had greater fibre length (1.4 mm) than tension wood.
- Observation Tension wood had wider vessel diameter (156.80 µm) than normal wood.
- Recommendation Tension wood would substitute for normal wood in light construction works.