Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dhaincha intercropping for green manure increased rice grain yield over sole rice.

A claim from Split strategies and intercropping dhaincha for in situ green manuring and seed production in wet-seeded rice · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dhaincha intercropping for green manure increased rice grain yield over sole rice.

Treatment
Intercropping dhaincha exclusively for in situ green manuringe0
Interactor
dhainchae0other
Outcome
grain yield of ricee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole ricee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping dhaincha exclusively for in situ green manuring recorded a higher grain yield of rice (with green manure) than sole rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–330

Title

Split strategies and intercropping dhaincha for in situ green manuring and seed production in wet-seeded rice

S. Anbumani; B. Chandrasekaran; T. Nadanassababady; et al. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 2003. doi:10.1556/aagr.51.2003.2.5

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-0d2cf0239d6d612b1e211b9d220a812b33e5bb6ac2510b1e637edba46fa15186 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

95 papers: 77 positive, 18 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

86 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this claim · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

3,446 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.