Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulphur fertilization substantially reduced conventional intercrop wheat biomass yield.

A claim from Productivity of wheat/faba bean intercropping systems in response to sulphur fertilization and seed rate under contrasting management conditions · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilization substantially reduced conventional intercrop wheat biomass yield.

Treatment
S fertilizatione0
Outcome
biomass yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
S withhelde1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S fertilization reduced wheat seed yields and biomass yields substantially”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–326
e1

“S withheld respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–424

Title

Productivity of wheat/faba bean intercropping systems in response to sulphur fertilization and seed rate under contrasting management conditions

Yahuza Ibrahim 2012

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-2dbd8e47115afd5ad01bc7c01503d89804f32c40f7504f99dbe84fb761b4cdf2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 124 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

139 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.