Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined inoculation and nitrogen significantly increased grain yield at both locations.

A claim from Role of Rhizobial inoculation in the production of chickpea crop · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation and nitrogen significantly increased grain yield at both locations.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Inoculation and fertilizer nitrogen @ 30 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both locationse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation and fertilizer nitrogen @ 30 kg ha -1 individually and in combination significantly increased the grain yield of the crop at both locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–925
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59
e1

“effect of rhizobial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–441

Title

Role of Rhizobial inoculation in the production of chickpea crop

T. Khan 2006

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-2f8df22f727b4c10f73cd4c6896ce8a3f92f73544d4a40a6d6047a5340bf2037 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

208 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

336 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.