Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same treatment gave higher dry matter and ash content than other treatments and control.

A claim from Yield and qualitative evaluation of fodder maize ( Zea mays L.) under potassium and zinc based integrated nutrient management · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave higher dry matter and ash content than other treatments and control.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
100 % RDK+PGPR+ YM (5 t ha−1) + two-time spray of 0.5% Zne1
Interactor
PGPRe1symbiont
Outcome
dry matter and ash contente1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
other treatments and controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e1

“application of 100 % RDK+PGPR+ YM (5 t ha−1) + two-time spray of 0.5% Zn resulted in higher green fodder yield (t ha−1), dry fodder yield (t ha−1), dry matter and ash content, increased crude protein (CP) content and yield with a concomitant decrease in fibre fractions over other treatments and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–1021
t0

“fodder maize ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63

Title

Yield and qualitative evaluation of fodder maize ( Zea mays L.) under potassium and zinc based integrated nutrient management

Baljeet; Sanjeev Kumar; Magan Singh; et al. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 2020. doi:10.5958/2231-6744.2020.00037.7

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-3937bc3c01527356867ae06b607e8b2e3622e013f162498b3209af2592ac4e2f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

application · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.