Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Herbicide combination W4 enhanced growth, yield and benefit cost ratio of wheat compared with the weedy check.

A claim from Impact of sowing techniques and herbicide combinations on weed flora in wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide combination W4 enhanced growth, yield and benefit cost ratio of wheat compared with the weedy check.

Treatment
pendimethalin fb post-emergence application of pinoxaden + metsulfuron-methyle4
Outcome
growth, yield and benefit cost ratioe3
Direction
enhancede3
Comparator
weedy checke3
Setting
Students’ Research Farm, Khalsa College, Amritsare0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was conducted at Students’ Research Farm, Khalsa College, Amritsar during rabi season of 2020-21”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–226
e3

“W4 enhanced of growth, yield and benefit cost ratio of wheat which was at par with W6 (weed free), W1 and W2 and significantly better than W3, W5 and W7 as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1264
e4

“The maximum yield (54.29 q ha-1) was achieved by first spraying of pre-emergence herbicide pendimethalin fb post-emergence application of pinoxaden + metsulfuron-methyl in W4 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1547

Title

Impact of sowing techniques and herbicide combinations on weed flora in wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Mohitesh Singh; Gurbax Singh Chhina; Ranjot Kaur International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i9j.1661

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-45dce384e654cbb61a80a7c5b3ab92fd006e63348713f498b39877981ea23ffa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

pinoxaden · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

146 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.